Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Conservapædia Has A New Project, "The Conservative Bible Project"
Source: scienceblogs
URL Source: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ervapdia_has_a_new_project.php
Published: Oct 5, 2009
Author: scienceblogs
Post Date: 2009-10-05 14:38:43 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 143
Comments: 2

The far right wing has long rested their authority on Biblical truth — how can you possibly question them if they speak for God, after all? There is one little problem, however.

The Bible is suffused with liberal bias. A lot of the Old Testament isn't bad, but the New Testament, when Jesus makes the scene, suddenly takes a turn into commie-land, with it's talk of helping the poor and camels and needles and so forth. Jesus was obviously misquoted all over the place.

So what to do? When your claim of godly authority rests on your interpretation of God's holy word, but God's holy words contradict your desired ends, you're in a bit of a pickle. There is a solution, though: rewrite the Bible and change the liberal bits! For this reason some of the deranged editors at Conservapædia have launched The Conservative Bible Project, which will purge the wimpy stuff and return it to it's authentic roots, as a book that could have been written by a dumb-as-a-stick American Republican NRA member who wants to kill communists and A-rabs.

I'm not joking. They cite as reasons for a rewrite the fact that the Bible uses the term "comrade" three times, and acknowledges the existence of laborers thirteen times. It's practically a Marxist/Leninist tract.

They conveniently give an example of the kind of thing that needs to be fixed.

The earliest, most authentic manuscripts lack this verse set forth at Luke 23:34:

Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Is this a liberal corruption of the original? This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible.

As we all know, after all, Jesus really wasn't into that "forgiveness" thing.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

The Bible is suffused with liberal bias. A lot of the Old Testament isn't bad, but the New Testament, when Jesus makes the scene, suddenly takes a turn into commie-land, with it's talk of helping the poor and camels and needles and so forth. Jesus was obviously misquoted all over the place.

Those aren't leftist impulses. Jesus urged individual action and individual choice to solve the problems of his time. He was the opposite of a "big government" advocate.

I'm not a conservative, but I do know when an author is playing loose and lazy with rhetoric and facts in order to fit a particular bias for his readership.

MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-05   14:41:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0) (Edited)

the person who wrote the article must be a Bible researcher for Rick Warren who had to use verses chosen from a plethora of versions to fit his means in his purpose driven crap. of the fourteen Bible versions on the Blue Letter Bible site only three versions even contained the word comrade and only the English Standard Version had it three times, the Revised Standard Version listed it only twice, the YNG (whatever version it is) list the word twice in the NT, both ESV and RSV listed it only in the OT. if you want you can see how accurate the author is on the word laborers.

The earliest, most authentic manuscripts lack this verse set forth at Luke 23:34:
is code for no one knows which manuscript(s) is/are correct so lets just ignore the word of GOD.


The best gun to have, is the gun you have, when you need a gun.

IRTorqued  posted on  2009-10-05   15:45:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest