4um: Interesting post

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Interesting post
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=276955&Disp=10#C10
Published: Oct 30, 2009
Author: Murron
Post Date: 2009-10-30 06:39:29 by randge
Keywords: None
Views: 43075
Comments: 433

81. To: AGAviator, goldi-lox (#76)
The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc.
No ISP that would want to be associated with that.

2305 Wallace Blvd. Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
P: (609) 758-6380 F: (609) 758-7114
www.inetebiz.com
Corporate (VVl Associates, Inc -- Parent Company)
1 Lauren Lane New Egypt, NJ 08533
P: (609) 758-8858 F: (609) 758-7114
www.vvl.com
Destro posted on 2009-10-30 03:31:02 ET Reply Trace 3. To: Goldi-Lox, out damned spot, Marguerite, mel_living, beyond the sea, yukon, domer, sneakypete, Willie Green, fitz, blackhorse, packrat1145, fitz, Blutarsky, Don, Joe Snuffy, GarySpFc, JLO, Mad Dog, Itzlzha, ALL (#1)
Destro: "The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc. No ISP that would want to be associated with that."

63. To: Destro (#40)
Destro: "I am getting this website banned from public access computers like in libraries because of it."
A Pole: "Do you mean that I will lose my library access to LP? "
A Pole posted on 2009-10-29 10:00:53 ET Reply Trace

Click for Full Text!

Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
A very social democrat, no?
Or was it a christian democrat?
I forget which.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 161.
#6. To: randge (#0)
LOL!
Too late, LP has been on a black list for at least 4 years now.
I told Goldi this news and she immediately plugged up her ears, accused me of bashing her people, and banned me.

RickyJ posted on 2009-10-30 7:38:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: RickyJ (#6)
deleted

Eric Stratton posted on 2009-10-30 10:38:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#10)
You may have problems with a forum or forum members, but do you rat them out to the libraries?

randge posted on 2009-10-30 10:40:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: randge, Eric Stratton (#11)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

A gaggle of Goldi's favored posters were posting obscene language about sex with animals, gay orgies, etc as replies to those that were on Goldi's enemies list and that is what would get them banned from libraries.

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:12:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#48. To: Destro (#44)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

You didn't insult me at all.
But permit me, it is the political cast of your complaint that I found disturbing.
There's a lot of anti-gov't talk here of a real strong nature sometimes. I'd like to feel that I or anyone else can shoot his bloody mouth of here within forum guidelines without a fellow poster taking it to some internet authority.
I believe that next time I'll handle this kind of stuff per pm.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 12:45:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#52. To: randge (#48)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.
You didn't insult me at all.

Where did I write that to you at #11 or at #44 - I don't mind apologizing I just don't see where you asked for one and where I gave you an apology?

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:59:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#55. To: Destro (#52)
Misread the post in haste.
Things get too personal here sometimes. And ugly. And a lot uglier over there than here that's for sure by your testimony. That's why I stay away from that place.
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
Makes folks nervous when you threaten to pull the chain on filters, though. You might want to swear that kind of thing off for the duration.
Regards - r.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 13:26:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#58. To: randge, PaulCJ (#55)
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.

I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 13:33:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#62. To: Hayek Fan, randge, (#58)
Hayek Fan: Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
randge, I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.
If you have a better idea to stop muslim fanatical terrorists, I am listening.
And none of your blame america crap.
These muslim fanatics are not going to stop until either they are all dead, or they have murdered all of us.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 13:47:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#71. To: PaulCJ (#62)
Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.

You said:
"Inspired by JMS' Babylon 5 series. The way to stop these terrorist attacks is to make it so, anyone caught aiding or committing terrorist attacks will not only be execute without trial, but also their entire family will be executed as well, all the way to third-cousins."
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=276764&Disp=4#C4
That's clearly nazi occupation doctrine. My old man saw such. He witnessed, but did not have to participate in, in a reprisal such as this. He recounted it for me on one occasion. He thought that it was shameful. All the men from a village were rounded up and shot in front of their families. All in reprisal for potshots at German soldiers. The detail that was called to do it got drunk beforehand and afterward.
Two things show weakness in warfare. Suicide attacks and massacring the innocent. Both sides are losers here.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 14:14:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#79. To: randge (#71)
Like I said, if you have better solution, I am listening.
Take into account, muslim fanatics cannot be reasoned with and are not afraid to die. As such, what is your solution?
Leaving will not work, muslim fanatics are attacking people all over the world. They will follow us and attack us here.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 14:29:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#92. To: PaulCJ (#79)
I'm damned if I know. But a policy of blowing everyone with any connection to insurgents to hell will, in the long run, lead to general opposition to us. And that is what is happening.
First US official resigns over Afghanistan war
Matthew Hoh, 36, a former captain in the Marine Corps who fought in Iraq before joining the US State Department, resigned from his post as the senior US civilian in Zabul province, a Taleban stronghold in Afghanistan. He said that he believed the war only fuelled the insurgency, the Washington Post reports.
"I have lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States' presence in Afghanistan," Mr Hoh wrote in his resignation letter, dated September 10.
"I have doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy, but my resignation is based not upon how we are pursuing this war, but why and to what end."
He said that many Afghans were fighting the United States largely because its troops were there. While the Taleban was a malign presence, and al-Qaeda needed to be confronted, he said, the US was asking its troops to die in Afghanistan for what was essentially a far-off civil war
www.timesonline.co.uk/tol...nistan/article6891536.ece

randge posted on 2009-10-30 14:44:32 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#122. To: randge (#92)
I'm damned if I know. But a policy of blowing everyone with any connection to insurgents to hell will, in the long run, lead to general opposition to us.

If you haven't noticed, the U.S. press for the last four decades have done a thorough job of getting the rest of the world to hate us, the U.S.
Most of the world are attacking the U.S. now by bribing politicians in the U.S. to destroy the U.S. from within, while trying to steal, through the law, everything of value in the U.S.
It's a shorter list of who in the world isn't working in some way to destroy the U.S.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 15:40:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#131. To: PaulCJ (#122)
If you haven't noticed, the U.S. press for the last four decades have done a thorough job of getting the rest of the world to hate us, the U.S.

Yes, even our malingering press can't ignore the mess we've made in Iraq and Afghanistan with our hamhanded butchery and incompetence.
Most of the world are attacking the U.S. now by bribing politicians in the U.S. to destroy the U.S. from within, while trying to steal, through the law, everything of value in the U.S.
We don't need the world's help. We're doing a fine job of that all by ourselves.
The proof is in the pudding on this one, and it is going south in rapid order.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 16:40:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#138. To: randge (#131)
Yes, even our malingering press can't ignore the mess we've made in Iraq and Afghanistan with our hamhanded butchery and incompetence.

That is what the anti-american press has tricked you into believing.
I guess in the new world order the press spouts that wanting to fight for survival is a crime for the U.S.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 17:03:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#145. To: PaulCJ (#138)
I guess in the new world order the press spouts that wanting to fight for survival is a crime for the U.S.

Fight for survival? LOLOL! What a drama queen. The United States government under the control of the Republicrat and Democan parties is a million-fold more of a threat to you and your family than any towel head on the other side of the world is. The fight for survival is between your freedom and the government you so desperately want to protect you. And you want people on this site to believe you are an anarchist? Who are you trying to kid? You can't be an anarchist while hanging on to the skirts of government yelling "protect me, protect me" at the same time.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 17:26:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#149. To: Hayek Fan (#145) (Edited)
1. Fight for survival? LOLOL! What a drama queen. The United States government under the control of the Republicrat and Democan parties is a million-fold more of a threat to you and your family than any towel head on the other side of the world is.
2. The fight for survival is between your freedom and the government you so desperately want to protect you.
3. And you want people on this site to believe you are an anarchist? Who are you trying to kid?
4. You can't be an anarchist while hanging on to the skirts of government yelling "protect me, protect me" at the same time.

1. It's more a "line forms to the left" situation as to who wants to destroy the U.S. and mass-murder the U.S. population.
2. So, "death panels" are protection to you?
3. I have never asked government for anything.
4. Two enemies decide to fight each other. Who am I too complain.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 17:56:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#151. To: PaulCJ (#149)
1. It's more a "line forms to the left" situation as to who wants to destroy the U.S. and mass-murder the U.S. population.

It must be very stressful going through life being such a coward.
2. So, "death panels" are protection to you?
I did not vote for Obama, do not support Obama, and am against government health care, so I don't understand what that means. Unlike yourself, I do not look to the government to protect me from bogymen. I am well armed and know how to defend myself with or without a weapon and have no fear whatsoever that some Islamic bogyman is going to come and get me. If you can't get rid of that fear then you should either move to a smaller community or see a psychiatrist as it's probably a chemical imbalance.
3. I have never asked government for anything.
That's not true. You are asking the government to send soldiers into harm's way and die in order to make you "feel" safe.
4. Two enemies decide to fight each other. Who am I too complain.
The members of the United States military are not your enemy. The government that controls them and issues them orders is.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 18:12:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#157. To: Hayek Fan (#151)
It must be very stressful going through life being such a coward.

Stating a problem is the first part of solving that problem. The U.S. population has more enemies than it has allies.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 18:28:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#161. To: PaulCJ (#157)
Stating a problem is the first part of solving that problem

Killing every Muslim man, woman and child on the face of the Earth in order to make you feel safe is not a solution it's a fantasy.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 18:31:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 161.
#163. To: Hayek Fan (#161)
Killing every Muslim man, woman and child on the face of the Earth in order to make you feel safe is not a solution it's a fantasy.

I am not part of the "sheet of glass" group. I posed a radical suggestion to stop muslim fanatics to see if anyone could come up with a less destructive, more productive solution. That solution has yet to appear.
To many people prefer to complain and make insults instead.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 18:37:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 161.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um