4um: Interesting post

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Interesting post
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=276955&Disp=10#C10
Published: Oct 30, 2009
Author: Murron
Post Date: 2009-10-30 06:39:29 by randge
Keywords: None
Views: 43454
Comments: 433

81. To: AGAviator, goldi-lox (#76)
The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc.
No ISP that would want to be associated with that.

2305 Wallace Blvd. Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
P: (609) 758-6380 F: (609) 758-7114
www.inetebiz.com
Corporate (VVl Associates, Inc -- Parent Company)
1 Lauren Lane New Egypt, NJ 08533
P: (609) 758-8858 F: (609) 758-7114
www.vvl.com
Destro posted on 2009-10-30 03:31:02 ET Reply Trace 3. To: Goldi-Lox, out damned spot, Marguerite, mel_living, beyond the sea, yukon, domer, sneakypete, Willie Green, fitz, blackhorse, packrat1145, fitz, Blutarsky, Don, Joe Snuffy, GarySpFc, JLO, Mad Dog, Itzlzha, ALL (#1)
Destro: "The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc. No ISP that would want to be associated with that."

63. To: Destro (#40)
Destro: "I am getting this website banned from public access computers like in libraries because of it."
A Pole: "Do you mean that I will lose my library access to LP? "
A Pole posted on 2009-10-29 10:00:53 ET Reply Trace

Click for Full Text!

Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
A very social democrat, no?
Or was it a christian democrat?
I forget which.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 273.
#6. To: randge (#0)
LOL!
Too late, LP has been on a black list for at least 4 years now.
I told Goldi this news and she immediately plugged up her ears, accused me of bashing her people, and banned me.

RickyJ posted on 2009-10-30 7:38:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: RickyJ (#6)
deleted

Eric Stratton posted on 2009-10-30 10:38:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#10)
You may have problems with a forum or forum members, but do you rat them out to the libraries?

randge posted on 2009-10-30 10:40:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: randge, Eric Stratton (#11)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

A gaggle of Goldi's favored posters were posting obscene language about sex with animals, gay orgies, etc as replies to those that were on Goldi's enemies list and that is what would get them banned from libraries.

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:12:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#48. To: Destro (#44)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

You didn't insult me at all.
But permit me, it is the political cast of your complaint that I found disturbing.
There's a lot of anti-gov't talk here of a real strong nature sometimes. I'd like to feel that I or anyone else can shoot his bloody mouth of here within forum guidelines without a fellow poster taking it to some internet authority.
I believe that next time I'll handle this kind of stuff per pm.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 12:45:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#52. To: randge (#48)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.
You didn't insult me at all.

Where did I write that to you at #11 or at #44 - I don't mind apologizing I just don't see where you asked for one and where I gave you an apology?

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:59:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#55. To: Destro (#52)
Misread the post in haste.
Things get too personal here sometimes. And ugly. And a lot uglier over there than here that's for sure by your testimony. That's why I stay away from that place.
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
Makes folks nervous when you threaten to pull the chain on filters, though. You might want to swear that kind of thing off for the duration.
Regards - r.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 13:26:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#58. To: randge, PaulCJ (#55)
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.

I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 13:33:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#62. To: Hayek Fan, randge, (#58)
Hayek Fan: Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
randge, I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.
If you have a better idea to stop muslim fanatical terrorists, I am listening.
And none of your blame america crap.
These muslim fanatics are not going to stop until either they are all dead, or they have murdered all of us.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 13:47:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#177. To: PaulCJ (#62)
Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.

So for each Palestinian child killed by the IDF, should a synagogue be blown up, or for each Afghan or Iraqi killed by a Christian soldier, should a church be blown up?
That IS your logic, isn't it?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-30 19:13:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#185. To: FormerLurker (#177)
So for each Palestinian child killed by the IDF, should a synagogue be blown up, or for each Afghan or Iraqi killed by a Christian soldier, should a church be blown up?

Depends on who first started the battle in question.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 21:07:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#267. To: PaulCJ (#185)
Depends on who first started the battle in question.

A wrong in return for a wrong does not make it right. Sheesh, you really WOULD consider that sort of revenge wouldn't you...

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 20:39:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#268. To: FormerLurker (#267)
A wrong in return for a wrong does not make it right.

That is usually a tyrant's motto. And gives a tyrant the excuse to commit wrong after wrong without worry of reprisal.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 20:47:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#273. To: PaulCJ (#268)
That is usually a tyrant's motto. And gives a tyrant the excuse to commit wrong after wrong without worry of reprisal.

So you're advocating terrorism as a legitimate means of avenging perceived wrongs?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 21:00:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 273.
#274. To: FormerLurker (#273)
So you're advocating terrorism as a legitimate means of avenging perceived wrongs?

Are you advocating abolishing self-defense? Because that is how your previous post could be interpreted.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 21:01:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 273.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um