4um: Interesting post

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Interesting post
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=276955&Disp=10#C10
Published: Oct 30, 2009
Author: Murron
Post Date: 2009-10-30 06:39:29 by randge
Keywords: None
Views: 43380
Comments: 433

81. To: AGAviator, goldi-lox (#76)
The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc.
No ISP that would want to be associated with that.

2305 Wallace Blvd. Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
P: (609) 758-6380 F: (609) 758-7114
www.inetebiz.com
Corporate (VVl Associates, Inc -- Parent Company)
1 Lauren Lane New Egypt, NJ 08533
P: (609) 758-8858 F: (609) 758-7114
www.vvl.com
Destro posted on 2009-10-30 03:31:02 ET Reply Trace 3. To: Goldi-Lox, out damned spot, Marguerite, mel_living, beyond the sea, yukon, domer, sneakypete, Willie Green, fitz, blackhorse, packrat1145, fitz, Blutarsky, Don, Joe Snuffy, GarySpFc, JLO, Mad Dog, Itzlzha, ALL (#1)
Destro: "The host site at http://www.inetebiz.com/ will soon act on the fact LP is a hate site, uses perveerted language and images and members advocating the violent overthrow of the government, promoting racism, etc. No ISP that would want to be associated with that."

63. To: Destro (#40)
Destro: "I am getting this website banned from public access computers like in libraries because of it."
A Pole: "Do you mean that I will lose my library access to LP? "
A Pole posted on 2009-10-29 10:00:53 ET Reply Trace

Click for Full Text!

Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
A very social democrat, no?
Or was it a christian democrat?
I forget which.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 415.
#6. To: randge (#0)
LOL!
Too late, LP has been on a black list for at least 4 years now.
I told Goldi this news and she immediately plugged up her ears, accused me of bashing her people, and banned me.

RickyJ posted on 2009-10-30 7:38:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: RickyJ (#6)
deleted

Eric Stratton posted on 2009-10-30 10:38:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#10)
You may have problems with a forum or forum members, but do you rat them out to the libraries?

randge posted on 2009-10-30 10:40:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: randge, Eric Stratton (#11)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

A gaggle of Goldi's favored posters were posting obscene language about sex with animals, gay orgies, etc as replies to those that were on Goldi's enemies list and that is what would get them banned from libraries.

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:12:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#48. To: Destro (#44)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.

You didn't insult me at all.
But permit me, it is the political cast of your complaint that I found disturbing.
There's a lot of anti-gov't talk here of a real strong nature sometimes. I'd like to feel that I or anyone else can shoot his bloody mouth of here within forum guidelines without a fellow poster taking it to some internet authority.
I believe that next time I'll handle this kind of stuff per pm.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 12:45:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#52. To: randge (#48)
I did mot insult you and I apologize if it sounded that way.
You didn't insult me at all.

Where did I write that to you at #11 or at #44 - I don't mind apologizing I just don't see where you asked for one and where I gave you an apology?

Destro posted on 2009-10-30 12:59:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#55. To: Destro (#52)
Misread the post in haste.
Things get too personal here sometimes. And ugly. And a lot uglier over there than here that's for sure by your testimony. That's why I stay away from that place.
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
Makes folks nervous when you threaten to pull the chain on filters, though. You might want to swear that kind of thing off for the duration.
Regards - r.

randge posted on 2009-10-30 13:26:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#58. To: randge, PaulCJ (#55)
Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.

I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2009-10-30 13:33:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#62. To: Hayek Fan, randge, (#58)
Hayek Fan: Some jerk over there said that we should round up all the suspected terrorist's relatives and shoot them summarily too. They're all crazy as bedbugs.
randge, I believe that was PaulCJ who wrote that. He posts here also. He's a chikenhawk.

Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.
If you have a better idea to stop muslim fanatical terrorists, I am listening.
And none of your blame america crap.
These muslim fanatics are not going to stop until either they are all dead, or they have murdered all of us.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 13:47:23 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#177. To: PaulCJ (#62)
Yea, I did. I also suggested that a muslim mosque, or muslim holy site be destroyed for each muslim terrorist act committed.

So for each Palestinian child killed by the IDF, should a synagogue be blown up, or for each Afghan or Iraqi killed by a Christian soldier, should a church be blown up?
That IS your logic, isn't it?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-30 19:13:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#185. To: FormerLurker (#177)
So for each Palestinian child killed by the IDF, should a synagogue be blown up, or for each Afghan or Iraqi killed by a Christian soldier, should a church be blown up?

Depends on who first started the battle in question.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-30 21:07:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#267. To: PaulCJ (#185)
Depends on who first started the battle in question.

A wrong in return for a wrong does not make it right. Sheesh, you really WOULD consider that sort of revenge wouldn't you...

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 20:39:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#268. To: FormerLurker (#267)
A wrong in return for a wrong does not make it right.

That is usually a tyrant's motto. And gives a tyrant the excuse to commit wrong after wrong without worry of reprisal.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 20:47:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#273. To: PaulCJ (#268)
That is usually a tyrant's motto. And gives a tyrant the excuse to commit wrong after wrong without worry of reprisal.

So you're advocating terrorism as a legitimate means of avenging perceived wrongs?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 21:00:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#274. To: FormerLurker (#273)
So you're advocating terrorism as a legitimate means of avenging perceived wrongs?

Are you advocating abolishing self-defense? Because that is how your previous post could be interpreted.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 21:01:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#275. To: PaulCJ (#274)
Are you advocating abolishing self-defense? Because that is how your previous post could be interpreted.

You were talking about blowing up churches, synagogues, and mosques. How is blowing one of those up "self defense"?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 21:03:01 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#276. To: FormerLurker (#275)
Paulie apparently believes in the right of white, god-fearing Christian folk to 'pre-emptive self-defense', even in cases where those would-be assailants never heard of him and stood less than zero chance of ever coming within a continent of him.

Samuel Gray posted on 2009-10-31 21:04:26 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#290. To: FormerLurker (#276)
Sammy obviously believes that muslims have the right to put non-muslims to the sword, by either murdering them, or enslaving them.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 21:49:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#300. To: PaulCJ, Samuel Gray (#290)
Sammy obviously believes that muslims have the right to put non-muslims to the sword, by either murdering them, or enslaving them.

Please point out where Sam has said that. I can't seem to find anything like that posted on this thread, or anything implying that either.

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 21:59:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#306. To: FormerLurker (#300)
Point to where I previously said, "believes in the right of white".

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 22:34:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#308. To: PaulCJ (#306)
Point to where I previously said, "believes in the right of white".

Do you think you have the religious duty to kill Muslims?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 22:39:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#311. To: FormerLurker (#308)
Do you think you have the religious duty to kill Muslims?

Only when it is those who seek to steal from, rape, or murder my family, friends, or myself.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 22:42:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#320. To: PaulCJ (#311)
Only when it is those who seek to steal from, rape, or murder my family, friends, or myself.

Well that is not the same as what you said earlier. You wanted to preemptively attack a house of worship, which could have largely been filled with innocent people who had no intent of doing any of the above.
If there is but ONE criminal in a Baptist Church, should the entire church be firebombed along with everyone in it?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 23:04:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#325. To: FormerLurker (#320)
How many times will I have to say this. You cannot reason with muslim fanatics and muslim fanatics are not afraid to die.
So a peaceful solution is out of the question because muslim fanatics cannot be reasoned with. Threat of killing them does not work because muslim fanatics do not fear death. That only leaves as the only targets against muslim fanatics, as being things that muslim fanatics care about.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-10-31 23:08:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#343. To: PaulCJ, Liberator (#325)
You cannot reason with muslim fanatics and muslim fanatics are not afraid to die.
Why then do you insist on MAKING them fanatics by killing their families, taking their land, and generally pissing on their heads?
So a peaceful solution is out of the question because muslim fanatics cannot be reasoned with.
Have you ever TRIED to reason with someone over there in the Middle East? When's the last time you were there?
You're full of hot air Paul, along with a lot of self righteousness that has no foundation in fact.
That only leaves as the only targets against muslim fanatics, as being things that muslim fanatics care about.
Seems to me that YOU are the fanatic here. Have you seen any church bombings lately? Even these so-called Muslim fanatics haven't sunken to that level, yet you are perfectly ok with doing it to them.
Hypocrite.
You AND Liberator, both of you.
How about you Liberator, are you ready to go blow up some kids in a mosque?

FormerLurker posted on 2009-10-31 23:25:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#378. To: FormerLurker (#343)
Why then do you insist on MAKING them fanatics by killing their families, taking their land, and generally pissing on their heads?

They are already brainwashed fanatics.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 2:22:28 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#382. To: PaulCJ (#378)
They are already brainwashed fanatics.

Any more so than yourself?
I've worked with a few guys who were from Pakistan, in fact, I used to go out drinking and shoot pool with one of them. He certainly didn't seem like the sort of person who'd go blow up a church, unlike you.

FormerLurker posted on 2009-11-01 12:59:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#384. To: FormerLurker (#382)
Any more so than yourself?

Hey, I am open to other options, besides surrender, just no one has stated any solutions. They just complain and insult.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 13:48:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#385. To: PaulCJ (#384)
Why don't you just start your own thread on this idiotic subject. This one was supposed to be about how f'ed up Goldi and her Klan of K00ks is.

Samuel Gray posted on 2009-11-01 13:53:25 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#386. To: Samuel Gray (#385)
Why don't you just start your own thread on this idiotic subject. This one was supposed to be about how f'ed up Goldi and her Klan of K00ks is.

If someone tried to shutdown you, you would be pissed too.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 13:58:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#387. To: PaulCJ (#386)
If someone tried to shutdown you, you would be pissed too.

They're too stupid to know that what they're doing is wrong. They're piss- ignorant and proud, sort of like you.
I solved your problem, by the way. Let's just kill everything that scares you.

Samuel Gray posted on 2009-11-01 14:00:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#388. To: Samuel Gray (#387)
They're too stupid to know that what they're doing is wrong.

You need to look in the mirror.
Destro on LP insulted the U.S., the U.S. population, the U.S. government. He insulted anything U.S. He did this for over TWO YEARS. When he realized that no one was listening to him, he started trying to get ISPs to block LP based on lies. That is when Goldi banned him from LP.
Mark my words, Destro will someday try to do the same on Freedom4um, then we will see how much you feel like defending him.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 14:15:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#389. To: PaulCJ (#388) (Edited)
Paulie, Paulie, Paulie...the world is full of boogeyman and you're just a scared little boy.
So far, you've only managed to 'recruit' Littlebaby to your war on Islam. Good luck with that.
Destro was poking at the k00ks, which is a hilarious pastime, and they absolutely cannot take it when you do it. And LP is a 'hate site'. Just now saw someone over there calling on people to play "cowboys and niggers." Wanna put a positive spin on that?
Nothing in that post he made was a lie about LP. Their own database will bear that out. And anyone can report any site they feel has questionable content if that site may potentially be viewed on public computers. That's what "abuse@whoever.net" buttons were invented for. Goldi and the kooks, however, reacted in such a knee-jerk way that it revealed that they're very afraid of that happening. What's the silly twat going to do, sue everyone who gives LP a negative review somewhere on the web?

Samuel Gray posted on 2009-11-01 14:23:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#393. To: Samuel Gray (#389)
Paulie, Paulie, Paulie...the world is full of boogeyman and you're just a scared little boy.

Sammy, Sammy, Sammy... the most of the rest of the world wants to destroy the U.S., while you choose to have your head in the sand.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 14:50:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#394. To: PaulCJ (#393)
..... the rest of the world wants to destroy the U.S., while you choose to have your head in the sand.

ROTFL ....
The USA has the largest defense budget of any other nation; in fact adding all other nation's defense expenditures collectively ( exceptions: Russia and China ) doesn't rival the USA. Only the USA has shown aggression around the world by promoting the media lie: keeping peace while creating turmoil.

buckeroo posted on 2009-11-01 14:56:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#395. To: buckeroo (#394)
The USA has the largest defense budget of any other nation;

That is not factoring in the inflation of the U.S. dollar.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 14:59:15 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#398. To: PaulCJ (#395) (Edited)
Here, I will start .....

Get the picture? Now, who is picking on the USA?

buckeroo posted on 2009-11-01 15:05:35 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#402. To: buckeroo (#398) (Edited)
The psycho Islamophobe didn't reply to your graph but I shall.
$700 Billion annually on defense,eh???? About half of the world's expenditure on military, eh????
AND with ALL that cash, equipment, intelligence, resources, military hardware, snoops and so forth and so on, the DoD, CIA/FBI, et. al. could not stop/prevent 19 alleged hijackers from crashing passenger jets into American buildings.
Ergo, two possibilities:
1) security/defense incompetence to such a degree that it could be considered CRIMINAL by any reasonable person, or
2) the government KNEW about it and did not stop it.

wbales posted on 2009-11-01 17:25:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#403. To: wbales, PaulCJ (#402)
The psycho Islamophobe [PaulCJ] didn't reply to your graph but I shall.

I enjoy putting the world in perspective even for political concepts. America is an empire. And PaulCJ won't ever respond but with some pathetic answer about how America NEEDS to ensure world peace {he will make it all up as he goes along, if you catch my drift}.
And you wonder why America is all fucked upped?

buckeroo posted on 2009-11-01 18:33:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#405. To: buckeroo (#403) (Edited)
I enjoy putting the world in perspective even for political concepts. America is an empire. And PaulCJ won't ever respond but with some pathetic answer about how America NEEDS to ensure world peace {he will make it all up as he goes along, if you catch my drift}.

I was making sure my numbers are right. Besides, does that spending in your graph for the U.S. part include money spent on the intelligence branches?

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 21:45:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#407. To: PaulCJ (#405)
I was making sure my numbers are right.

So how is your self-assurance? Do you feel humbled, now?

buckeroo posted on 2009-11-01 22:05:42 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#408. To: buckeroo (#407)
So how is your self-assurance? Do you feel humbled, now?

You need to learn to check your math before you post it. It's call fact checking.
I found an interesting article.
China is increasing it's military spending. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7922699.stm
The article is dated around 2 weeks after your graph was made.
Also, the U.S. dollar's value has slid in that last six months by close to ten percent. Gold value last march was around $950 U.S. dollars an ounce. Now gold is around $1,050 U.S. dollars an ounce. goldprice.org/gold-price-...ry.html#30_day_gold_price

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-01 22:30:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#410. To: PaulCJ (#408) (Edited)
Now you look ridiculous with your parsing of data. Sort of like when you posted that there are no shooting ranges or gun clubs in California.

mininggold posted on 2009-11-01 22:38:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#415. To: mininggold (#410)
Sort of like when you posted that there are no shooting ranges or gun clubs in California.

Source, or you are lying.

PaulCJ posted on 2009-11-02 16:16:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 415.
There are no replies to Comment # 415.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 415.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest