Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Does Islam Breed Violence? (An Iranian-Born American's View)
Source: FaithFreedomOrg
URL Source: http://faithfreedom.org/islam/does-islam-breed-violence
Published: Nov 14, 2009
Author: Amil Amani
Post Date: 2009-12-03 22:32:29 by Liberator
Keywords: Islam, Bloody, Muslim, Cult
Views: 48384
Comments: 650

There is a division of the house. On one side are the politically correct in government, the leftist mainstream media, and a raft of Islamist apologists. One and all are tripping over each other in reassuring us that the mass murderers such as Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan and suicide bombers who detonate their explosive vests in crowded marketplaces and even mosques are individual anomalies and Islam is not responsible for what they do.

On the other hand are those who have been fed up with the numberless daily horrific acts that are clearly committed under the banner of Islam throughout the world. In all fairness, there needs to be a distinction. Numerous criminal acts are also committed, on a daily basis, by non-Muslims. The critical difference is that non-Muslim criminals do not hoist a religious banner to justify their misdeeds, while the Muslims proudly claim that they commit their heinous acts in obedience to the dictates of their religious faith.

Would someone, please, explain what motivated Nidal Hasan who had been, at tax payer’s expense, educated from college all the way through medical school and post medical-school training, to turn his deadly weapons against a nation that gave him everything he had?

If Islam had nothing to do with what Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan did, why:

* had he repeatedly preached the ascendancy of Islam to the U.S. Constitution?

* had he publicly supported Islamic suicide bombing?

* had he proclaimed his highest loyalty to Islam?

* had he been in contact with violent anti-U.S. Islamists and a virulent Yemeni Imam?

* did he distribute copies of the Quran to people the morning of his bloody attack?

* did he keep screaming “Allah-o-Akbar” as he heartlessly sprayed over a hundred bullets, killing thirteen and injuring some thirty innocent men and women?

Here is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of peace. Violence is at the very core of Islam. Violence is institutionalized in the Muslim’s holy book, the Quran, in many suras:

Qur'an:9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."

Qur'an:9:112 "The Believers fight in Allah's cause; they slay and are slain, kill and are killed."

Qur'an:8:39 "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."

Qur'an:8:65 "O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding."

Qur'an:9:38 "Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to go forth and fight in Allah's Cause you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you go forth, He will afflict and punish you with a painful doom, and put others in your place."

Qur'an:47:4 "When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle (fighting Jihad in Allah's Cause), smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making (them) captives. Thereafter either generosity or ransom (them based upon what benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens. Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam."

And the Quran is considered by Muslims as the word-for-word literal edicts of the Muslims’ god, Allah.

Right from the start, violence served as the engine of Islam under the command and supervision of Muhammad himself. For one, the Prophet’s son-in-law cousin, Ali, was titled the Commander of the Faithful for his unsurpassed feats of butchery. Ali with the assistance of one or two of his thugs, beheaded some seven hundred captives, most of them Jews, in only one day. This man, highly esteemed by the prophet of Allah, had a sword that had its own name—Zolfaghar. Ali’s portrait, holding the menacing sword, adorns the homes and shops throughout Shi’a’-lands. And this man, Ali, is revered by the Shi’a at the same level as Muhammad.

On the Sunni side, Muhammad’s co-revered is Umar, another unabashed killer of untold numbers. And of course the choice weapon of these champions of the religion of peace was the sword. And to this day, a sword adorns the flag of the birthplace of the religion of peace, Saudi Arabia.

And Islam, by the nature of its very doctrine, appeals to man’s base nature. It promotes intolerance, hatred, discrimination, and much more:

Qur'an:61:2 "O Muslims, why say one thing and do another? Grievously odious and hateful is it in the sight of Allah that you say that which you do not. Truly Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in a battle array, as if they were a solid cemented structure."

In reality, Islam is like a deadly contagious disease. Once it invades the mind of its victim, this debilitating disease is capable of transforming him to a helpless pawn that has no choice but to execute what he is directed to do.

Of the reported 1.3 billion Muslims in the world, millions are already trapped in the terminal stages of this affliction while millions of others are rapidly joining them. The people enslaved with the extreme cases of Islamic mental disease are highly infectious. They actively work to transmit the disease to others, while they themselves engage in horrific acts of mayhem and violence to demonstrate their unconditional obedience to the dictates of the Islamic cult of violence.

The savagery and variety of the actions of these Islamic captives are seen daily around the globe. Many of these acts, committed under the banner of Islam, have become so commonplace that the world has come to view them as the normal part and parcel of a troubled humanity. And, from time-to-time, the world is shocked into a passing and momentary realization of the evil deeds these Islamist robots commit and quickly gets over it and does nothing to seriously address this affliction of humanity.

The recent dastardly mass murder at Fort Hood, committed by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan will be forgotten by the public before very long. Life will continue on its deadly course, pushed along in a variety of ways by agents of death, Islamists. Only the families who lost their loved-ones and those who survived the bullets have to live the rest of their lives with incapacitating injuries, in the main, won’t be able to put the episode behind them.

The mass murderer Nidal Malik Hasan did not riddle people with bullets under the pressure of momentary insanity. The insanity, ironically, in a man who was trained to help people with sanity was introduced in him from the moment of birth and from the very early years when he prostrated himself five times daily toward Mecca in expression of total submission to the dogma of hate called Islam.

Islam is a mental retrovirus that has mutated into numerous varieties and degrees of severity, over the past 1400 years. Everyone born in a Muslim family, as well as those who convert to Islam, contract a particular mutation of the Islamic Virus. As is the case with all retroviruses, the Islamic Virus burrows deeply in the person and erupts, from time-to-time with potentially devastating consequences.

The Islamic Virus first divests the person of his most fundamental human attribute. It takes away his right to make decisions himself and absolves him, in return, of any responsibility for his actions rendered in blind obedience to it.

A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in freedom of choice. In the religion of Islam—Submission—everything is up to Allah, as clearly and repeatedly stipulated in the Quran .The Raison d'être for the Muslim is to be an unconditional submissive to the will and dictates of Allah. Everything that a “good” Muslim does is contingent upon the will and decree of Allah, he is indoctrinated to believe.

Humanity is facing a deeply troubling dilemma. On the one hand is the desire of enlightened people whose aim it is to forge a world of diverse people into one universal society ruled by peace and justice for everyone while, on the other hand, Islamists are hell-bent on imposing their stone-age system on everyone. Tellingly, the Muslims themselves are at one another’s throat regarding which of dozens of Islamic sects’ dogma should rule.

For now, Islam is busy with what it did from the time of its birth, fighting the non-Muslims and infighting.

Truth be told: Violence is the animating force of Islam. Islam is a religion born through violence, raised by violence, thrives on violence and dies without violence.

Author's Bio:

Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. He and his family escaped Iran after the radical Islamic revolution.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 341.

#212. To: Liberator (#0)

I believe the short answer would be: Yes.

Of course there are Muslims who are peaceful- but the violence by radical Muslims, throughout history is there. That can not be denied.

diva betsy ross  posted on  2009-12-04   21:50:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#217. To: diva betsy ross (#212)

The violence by radical Muslims, throughout history is there. That can not be denied.

It IS denied here at this forum or justified.

By the response of the majority of posts defending Islam on this thread, I can't tell whether this forum is actually 'Freedom 4um' OR MajorNadal.org.

The issue Diva isn't about individual peaceful Muslims, but what happens when they arise en masse "in the name of Allah."

Liberator  posted on  2009-12-04   22:03:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#264. To: Liberator (#217)

I can't tell whether this forum is actually 'Freedom 4um' OR MajorNadal.org

Why are you here?

wbales  posted on  2009-12-04   22:46:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#267. To: wbales (#264)

Why are you here?

Good question.

I had NO idea there were as many pro-Muslim crackpots like you infecting this forum.

Liberator  posted on  2009-12-04   22:51:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#288. To: Liberator (#267)

I had NO idea there were as many pro-Muslim crackpots like you infecting this forum.

I'm not really pro-Muslim, per se but you infer that from my being anti- Israel/Zionist. I do prefer the former to the latter.

There isn't a lot of Muslim representation in my tagline.

Speaking of which: what do you think of my tagline? Are the entities, groups, organizations therein good for America and Americans? Do they operate and function for the positive interests of America and Americans?

What do you think?

wbales  posted on  2009-12-04   23:17:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#290. To: wbales (#288)

Is this site really anti-Israel?

diva betsy ross  posted on  2009-12-04   23:19:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#295. To: diva betsy ross (#290)

Is this site really anti-Israel?

some of my prior taglines:

"If you love America--you'll hate Israel."

"In 1948, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel."

I need to research my prior taglines.

Are you pro-Israel?

wbales  posted on  2009-12-04   23:26:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#298. To: wbales (#295)

Ah- ok.. and yes I am, I am pro democracy, and I feel that it is right to support Israel because of where they are located- for strategic effect.. and I also make it a habit to not be anti- anything.. Other than anti-liberal. :)

So.. ok. Well thank you for your time and for being honest. Enjoy your forum and thanks for letting me post here a little bit.

diva betsy ross  posted on  2009-12-04   23:30:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#316. To: diva betsy ross (#298)

I am pro democracy, and I feel that it is right to support Israel because of where they are located- for strategic effect.

How's that democracy thingie working for you what with government at the state and federal levels ignoring the people's wishes at every turn?

Israel has no oil. Israel has no ME neighboring friends, who have oil. Zionists despise Christians who comprise 75% of America. Wouldn't it be more in America's interests - if we had to pick a ME ally - to pick a country that had oil and one that did not despise Christians?

scrapper2  posted on  2009-12-05   0:04:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#326. To: scrapper2 (#316)

Tell me more about Zionists. Part of my family is Mormon and they talk about Mt Zion. I never really paid too much attention to it.

mel_living  posted on  2009-12-05   0:39:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#330. To: mel_living (#326)

Tell me more about Zionists. Part of my family is Mormon and they talk about Mt Zion. I never really paid too much attention to it.

Surely you jest in pretending not to know much about Zionists, irrespective of your family's religion. Let Google be your teacher.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-12-05   1:10:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#333. To: scrapper2 (#330)

Don't know anything about Zionists. It's not one of the topics in my current class. I'll do some research - but not through Google. I prefer the university Library.

mel_living  posted on  2009-12-05   1:30:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#341. To: mel_living (#333)

Don't know anything about Zionists. It's not one of the topics in my current class.

2nd Grade is rough ain't it ?

noone222  posted on  2009-12-05   7:31:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 341.

#342. To: noone222 (#341)

2nd Grade is rough ain't it ?

hehehehehehehe

Cynicom  posted on  2009-12-05 08:42:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#476. To: noone222 (#341)

2nd Grade is rough ain't it ?

I don't remember. That was a long time ago for me.

mel_living  posted on  2009-12-05 15:07:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 341.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest