4um: David Duke Lambasts The Genocidal Policies Of Nicolas Sarkozy

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles
Title: David Duke Lambasts The Genocidal Policies Of Nicolas Sarkozy
Source: youtube.com
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCNIcClY8OQ
Published: Feb 6, 2010
Author: Dr. David Duke
Post Date: 2010-02-06 04:55:31 by Liberate Jim Traficant
Keywords: david duke, france, sarkozy, jews
Views: 223
Comments: 9

Stop the Genocide of European Mankind!
In this new video by Dr. David Duke, he exposes the Genocidal policies of Nicolas Sarkozy. He graphically shows that while Sarkozy works to destroy the European people, at the same time he actively works for Jewish Supremacist State of Israel. While he says in a recent speech that European Frenchmen must intermarry with Africans, he chooses to marry his own. That while he does nothing to stop the complete destruction of the French people, he supports Israel as a “Jewish State.” While he tells French men and women to intermarry, he supports Jewish organizations that have programs to prevent Jews from intermarrying. While he wants the French to intermarry, he supports Israel that outlaws intermarriage between a Jew and Gentile. This video like no other exposes the hypocrisy of Jewish supremacism!
Click here or on the picture for a link to the video
www.DavidDuke.com

Or if Youtube censors it try HERE (1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)
While he says in a recent speech that European Frenchmen must intermarry with Africans,.....

Did Sarkozy really say that?
Does anybody have a link to that speech?

sneakypete posted on 2010-02-06 6:00:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Liberate Jim Traficant (#0)
How can the french people be so dumb as to elect the very Jewish Sarkozy?

your_neighbor posted on 2010-02-06 6:27:01 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: your_neighbor (#2)
No "dumber" than Americans who elect puppets who are subservient to Organized Jewry. Jewish politicians like Sarkozy are much more savvy than others in attracting attention to themselves, clowning or doing something bizarre which gets people to talk about and remember them. Then of course, they have their media pumping them up.

Tatarewicz posted on 2010-02-06 6:44:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: Tatarewicz (#3)
Then of course, they have their media pumping them up.

The Western media is the backbone of Jewish power.

your_neighbor posted on 2010-02-06 6:48:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: sneakypete (#1)
Dec. 2008 post I found

The website of François Desouche provides a short video from that speech, which can be viewed in its entirety (45 minutes) at several websites including Daily Motion.
The excerpt in question centers on the France's obligation to become a mixed country - that troublesome word "métissé" is once again at the heart of his incredibly threatening speech. The verb "métisser" theoretically means to mix blood or to crossbreed, but at times it is used more loosely to mean mix cultures. Sarkozy uses the word, or a form of it, at least 7 times in the first few seconds of the video. Whether he is referring to the mixing of blood or merely destroying French culture by bringing in hostile aliens, it is impossible to avoid the fact that he is telling the French people, in terms that have never been so menacing, that they have to mix, or else.
What madness has the election of Obama wrought in the mind of this unFrench-man?
Here is my rendition of his words. It is far from perfect, because his grammar seems a bit off at times. Except for two places, I have retained the French word "métissage" (crossbreeding), and it's various verbal and adjectival forms, since "crossbreeding", "racial mixing" and other similar terms don't always convey the right meaning. "Crossbreeding" sounds too scientific, as when farmers crossbreed crops. "Miscegenation" is too technical and refers to marriage. "Mongrelization" and "bastardization" are too graphic. It looks as if "métissage" will join "laïcité" and "communautarisme" as French words that are so troublesome, it's better to just leave them.
However, if you have suggestions, feel free...
"(...) the objective is to meet the challenge of "métissage" - the challenge of "métissage" that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of "métissage", France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of "métissage" France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.
Note: In the above sentence we see that he IS talking about racially mixing the BLOOD of his compatriots with foreigners (and we know that the foreigners in question are not Swedes or Italians).
In the course of centuries, France has always known "métissage", France has always been "métissée".
Note: This is insanity. France has never been "métissée" in the way he is using the word. He is attempting to equate the mixing of the Franks, Latins and Celts with the mixing of white and black or of European and North African Muslim.
France has crossbred cultures, ideas and histories. France, who was able to crossbreed these cultures and these histories, constructed a universal language, because France herself is universal in the diversity of her origins.
Note: I'm not certain what he's trying to say except that out of the racially diverse mix, comes something universal. That may or may not be true, but it is not the point. Why does he want to destroy the civilization that grew and flourished over the past 2000 years, from the Roman Empire, to the Second World War? What is his complaint about French civilization, other than he doesn't like it very much?
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods.
Note: It is the above sentence that has Desouche's readers reaching for their guns.
But we don't have a choice. Diversity at the base of the country must be reflected by diversity at the head of the country.
Does this mean he will resign in favor of Dieudonné?
It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems.
We must change, so we will change.
For a man who only looks to the future, who admittedly cares nothing for the past, Nicolas Sarkozy seems to be completely out of step with the needs of his people. They did not elect him to change the DNA of the country, but to improve their lot, to fight crime, to reduce immigration, and to restore a sense of national pride. Of all the betrayals France has endured, this is the unkindest cut of all.
François Desouche has over 200 comments from readers. They range from "Let's take our families and get out of Europe" to "Send this guy to the gibbet".
I like the second suggestion.
Sarkozy : "relever le défi du métissage"
The only real problems anti-immigration types have with the non-whites already here is that they won't marry our daughters and won't adopt Haitian babies.
They "refuse to assimilate." Their "culture is incompatible."
THAT is not our problem.
Prefrontal Vortex posted on 2010-02-06 9:19:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: your_neighbor (#2)
How can the french people be so dumb as to elect the very Jewish Sarkozy?

Him being Jewish has nothing to do with it,but the fact that the communists pretty much control the votes in the big cities like Paris means they dominate French politics. That's why the French have such a reputation for hating Americans. Most American tourists visit the large cities like Paris,and they keep running into French communists that hate America for keeping the USSR from controlling all of Europe.
I have been told that once you get out of the large cities and into the more rural areas that the situation is totally different.
And the truth is the same thing is happening here in America,and has been happening since the 1950's.

sneakypete posted on 2010-02-06 10:32:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#7. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#5)
Why does he want to destroy the civilization that grew and flourished over the past 2000 years, from the Roman Empire, to the Second World War?

The answer to that is very simple. To create The New World Order/The Third Way (or as I refer to it,"Corporate Communism")it is first necessary to destroy the sovereignty of all nations and their sense of self-identity. You can't create a new system without first destroying the old system.
THIS is why France and other European countries are pushing for increased immigration from Africa and why the Dims and their RINO brothers are pushing for increased immigration from south of our borders. They know these newcomers have no interest in becoming French,American,etc,etc,etc,but plan on staying the same backwards ignorant creatures they were back at home. Do this for very long and you just won a shot-free revolution because they WILL become the majority voters,and they WILL vote to become a socialist part of Corporate Communism,Inc because the shitholes they come from were socialists,and they are too ignorant to realize that socialize and fascism are the same system.
AND....,those of you who keep blaming it all on the Jews are playing into their hands. Yeah,a lot of the international bankers behind this are Jewish,but not all of them by any means. Some are Chinese,some are Arabs,etc,etc,etc. Even the ones who are Jewish by birth are no more Jewish by conviction than they are Baptists by conviction. Religion is just a game them play to appease the masses and get them to fall into line,just like the Catholic Church is playing the ignorant masses to the south of our borders. Hell,a good case could be made that there are more Catholics behind this than there are Jews!
The actual truth is none of these people are religious true-believers themselves. Not even the ones working out of the Vatican. The only Gods they worship are the twin Gods of power and wealth.
Meanwhile,the international bankers keep the Rubes busy and distracted by playing Muslim versus Jew,or Muslim versus Christian,Christian versus Jew,and EVERYBODY versus non-believers,and this keeps the Rubes from nothing how they are being pimped out and raped.

sneakypete posted on 2010-02-06 10:50:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#8. To: your_neighbor (#4)
The Western media is the backbone of Jewish power.

Jewish power is the backbone of Western media. What is the media without jewish influence?? It's been several decades since anybody could answer that question.
_________________________________________________________________________
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
“The best and first guarantor of our neutrality and our independent existence is the defensive will of the people…and the proverbial marksmanship of the Swiss shooter. Each soldier a good marksman! Each shot a hit!”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
X-15 posted on 2010-02-10 14:39:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#9. To: X-15 (#8)
Jewish power is the backbone of Western media. What is the media without jewish influence?? It's been several decades since anybody could answer that question.

That is more then true!
The longer the silence lasts - the worse it will be for all the Jewish people.

your_neighbor posted on 2010-02-10 18:54:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um