Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Author! Author!
See other Author! Author! Articles

Title: Jim Cameron eager to mix it up with 'Avatar's' right-wing critics
Source: latimesblogs.latimes.com
URL Source: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the ... p-with-right-wing-critics.html
Published: Feb 13, 2010
Author: Patrick Goldstein on the collision of en
Post Date: 2010-02-13 00:44:24 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 849
Comments: 41

You can always tell that the Academy has sent out its final Oscar ballots by the sudden reappearance of gaudy full-page Oscar ads in the trades, my paper and the New York Times. It also means that most nominees, fearful of making a horrible gaffe, are especially careful not to say anything that could possibly be viewed as controversial in their interviews with the showbiz press.

Except, of course, for Jim Cameron.

He's on the cover of this week's The Envelope and he's clearly eager to mix it up with the multitudes of conservatives who've been trashing "Avatar," claiming that it's dumb, sanctimonious, anti-military, nuttily pro-environment and, as Big Hollywood's John Nolte memorably put it, a "Death Wish'' for leftists. Cameron isn't the sort of guy to take those brickbats lying down, even if means alienating a few Oscar voters, either because they agree with the conservative take on the film or prefer to vote for films that are free of any political leanings.

As he told Glenn Whipp: "Let me put it this way. I'm happy to piss those guys off. I don't agree with their worldview." As for his detractors' contempt for his environmental consciousness, dramatized in the film by the callous destruction of the Na'vi's pastoral world, Cameron says that the film's environmental message is a lesson for all moviegoers to digest. He explains that our planet "will be a dying world if we don't make some fundamental changes about how we view ourselves and how we view wealth .... We're going to have to live with less."

Cameron admits that many people will wonder what a fabulously wealthy filmmaker ensconced in a Malibu mansion knows about living with less, but he says that "I think there's a way to live and raise your kids with a set of values that teaches them the importance of hard work, the importance of respecting other people and the importance of respecting nature."

Cameron says he did have second thoughts about using an explicit "shock and awe" Iraq war reference in the film, but he insists that it reflects a bigger point he was trying to make. "What I really was saying was, 'Listen to what your leaders are saying. Open your eyes. And understand what the run-up to war is like, so the next time it happens, you can question it."

People have debated for years whether message-oriented films actually have an effect on filmgoers' consciousness. Seeing a movie is such an internalized, diffuse experience that it's hard to know how much of an influence it leaves behind. But I would say this: You could not have spent 150 minutes immersed in the world of "Avatar" without coming away with a new respect for how much we should treasure the natural resources of our world -- or any other.


Poster Comment:

I am in complete awe of this film. It is a movie that will revolutionaize the industry and bring people back to the theater.

More importantly this fim maker is spot on with his message on culture, the need for more focus on the environment, and I completely resonate with it.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle lives, and the Na'vi and Pandora have captured my imagination and heart. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#4. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

He explains that our planet "will be a dying world if we don't make some fundamental changes about how we view ourselves and how we view wealth .... We're going to have to live with less."

Who's "we?"

It's difficult to decide who is worse, pompous Hollywood types or pompous Washington types.

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   8:20:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Mister Clean (#4)

Yeh - it really pisses me off that some Hollywood character would have the nerve to show a military force in anything but a glowing light.

Those blue monkeys brought it on themselves. I mean, jeez, the militants even gassed them to give them a chance to leave their homes before they made the military bomb their homes.

I'm with you on this one MC. That jerk Cameron outta be water bordered for his hateful views on the US and its military.

tom007  posted on  2010-02-13   9:17:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#5)

Yeh - it really pisses me off that some Hollywood character would have the nerve to show a military force in anything but a glowing light.

I apologize for causing you to have knee jerk reaction but I wasn't referring to his views on the Iraq war. I was simply pointing to his pompous statements about how "we" are going to have to learn to live with less.

Do you really think any rich person, be they from Hollywood or D.C., is going to live with less?

If you choose to respond, please respond to what I actually wrote, okay?

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   9:36:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Mister Clean (#6)

i spose one of the main reasons you're so hostile to this film is that it demonstrates how images, even moving images, can be manipulated.

so we have to wonder about the authenticity of any video ---for instance, the bin laden "confession tape"--- dont we?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-13   10:29:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: groundresonance (#7)

i spose one of the main reasons you're so hostile to this film

Where did I say anything about the film?

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   10:34:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Mister Clean (#8)

ah.

i guess one of the reasons you're so hostile to cameron is that he's demonstrated how images, even moving images, can be manipulated.

so we have to wonder about the authenticity of any video ---for instance, the bin laden "confession tape"--- dont we?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-13   10:35:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: groundresonance (#9)

i guess one of the reasons you're so hostile to cameron is that he's demonstrated how images, even moving images, can be manipulated.

Where did I say anything about moving images?

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   10:37:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Mister Clean (#10)

so, just to clarify my point, you are hostile to cameron and his movie because it has conclusively demonstrated that it can create a digital reality that is indistinguishable from film of real reality.

so when you trot out your videotape "evidence" of bin laden's "confession", you're kinda sucking wind.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-13   10:46:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: groundresonance (#12)

so, just to clarify my point, you are hostile to cameron and his movie because it has conclusively demonstrated that it can create a digital reality that is indistinguishable from film of real reality.

You need to read what I said.

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   10:48:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Mister Clean (#13) (Edited)

i dont need to read you very carefully.

the fact remains: cameron has proved that video evidence is no evidence, especially when it's used as evidence by neocons to justify their wars....

...and that's what scares you about this film.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-13   10:55:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: groundresonance (#14)

i dont need to read you very carefully.

Obviously you do need to read my actual words since none of your comments had anything to do with what I said.

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13   11:04:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Mister Clean (#15)

the things you say are really not relevent to your main point...

the object of your posting, here, is to badmouth a demonstration of this fact: video is no longer evidence.

groundresonance  posted on  2010-02-13   11:20:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#17. To: groundresonance (#16)

the things you say are really not relevent to your main point...

So I say one thing but I actually am saying something totally different? I see that you're in your own little world of make believe. Enjoy yourself!

Mister Clean  posted on  2010-02-13 11:24:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest