Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Ron Paul: Feds spend $400/gallon on gas in Afghanistan
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62wSsXE7NXA
Published: Jul 11, 2010
Author: Ron Paul
Post Date: 2010-07-11 21:15:42 by RidleyReport
Keywords: None
Views: 336
Comments: 37

This is an unofficial illustrated version of Ron Paul's upcoming July 12 broadcast on Afghanistan. And you thought a few $69 toilet seats were a big deal!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62wSsXE7NXA

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#1. To: RidleyReport (#0)

Six young Army men died in Afghan this past week. No one cared.

Expensive gasoline is of no consequence.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-11   21:20:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Cynicom (#1) (Edited)

Six young Army men died in Afghan this past week. No one cared.

I care. All troops home now. Draft Chickenhawks. Make them pay a war tax to supply and rent whatever they think they need in order to do all by themselves what they want done.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-07-11   23:54:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GreyLmist (#3)

I care.

Try an experiment.

Post the article concerning the six young men, see how much interest is shown here.

Then look at the "truthers" post currently running.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-12   1:23:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Cynicom (#5)

Try an experiment.

Post the article concerning the six young men, see how much interest is shown here.

Then look at the "truthers" post currently running.

Although it's tragic that lives were lost, how many people have been killed in our name today that go unreported? Those young men signed up willingly, naively perhaps, but they are there as an occupation force, and it's not unfathomable that they might not be entirely welcome by those who call it home.

The Soviets ended up losing many lives before deciding it was time to leave. Hopefully our "leaders" will decide it's time to leave before there are many more lives lost, but the chances are that will not happen, at least not anytime soon.

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-20   12:18:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: FormerLurker (#10)

It is a demonstration of where the public interest lies.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-20   12:21:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#11)

It is a demonstration of where the public interest lies.

Are we supposed to be surprised that there will be casualties? Do you think we can actually convince Obama and those who pull his strings to do the right thing?

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-20   12:30:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#15)

I "think" we will NEVER leave the Middle East.

I "think" it has nothing to do with oil, opium or terror.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-20   12:33:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#16)

Oil, opium and terror are a GREAT cover story though. Because 'we' deal in all of them at a world class level...

Rotara  posted on  2010-07-20   12:36:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

        There are no replies to Comment # 19.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest