[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

Mark Levin: They lied to us about Biden

RIGGED: Pfizer cut deal to help Biden steal 2020 election

It's Dr. Kimmy date night!

Glenbrook Dodge will raise a new American flag just before the 4th of July

Horse's continuing struggles with getting online.

‘Trillion dollar trainwreck’: US super stealth fighter is eating the next generation

Who Died: June 2024 Week 4 | News

MORE TROUBLE FOR OLD JOE

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Federal Judge Revokes USDA Approval Of Monsanto's Genetically Modified Sugar Beets
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2010/08 ... -approval-of.html#comment-form
Published: Aug 16, 2010
Author: Michael Liedtke AP
Post Date: 2010-08-16 16:38:03 by Original_Intent
Keywords: GMO, Frankenfood, Poison, death
Views: 1744
Comments: 25

Federal Judge Revokes USDA Approval Of Monsanto's Genetically Modified Sugar Beets

Michael Liedtke
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge has revoked the government's approval of genetically altered sugar beets until regulators complete a more thorough review of how the scientifically engineered crops affect other food.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White Friday means sugar beet growers won't be able to use the modified seeds after harvesting the biotechnology beets already planted on more than 1 million acres spanning 10 states from Michigan to Oregon. All the seed comes from Oregon's Willamette Valley.

Additional planting won't be allowed until the U.S. Department of Agriculture submits an environmental impact statement. That sort of extensive examination can take two or three years.

White declined a request to issue an injunction that would have imposed a permanent ban on the biotech beets, which Monsanto Co. developed to resist its popular weed killer, Roundup. Farmers have embraced the technology as a way to lower their costs on labor, fuel and equipment.

The Center for Food Safety, Organic Seed Alliance and Sierra Club have been trying to uproot the biotech beets since filing a 2008 lawsuit.

Andrew Kimbrell, the Center for Food Safety's executive director, hailed Friday's decision as a major victory in the fight against genetically engineered crops and chided the Agriculture Department for approving the genetically engineered seeds without a full environmental review.

"Hopefully, the agency will learn that their mandate is to protect farmers, consumers and the environment and not the bottom line of corporations such as Monsanto," Kimbrell said in a statement.

Attempts to reach the Agriculture Department for comment Saturday were unsuccessful. Monsanto, based in St. Louis, referred requests for comment to the America Sugarbeet Growers Association, which pointed to a Saturday statement from the Sugar Industry Biotech Council.

In the statement, the sugar beet council said it intends to help the Agriculture Department come up with "interim measures" that would allow continued production of the genetically altered seeds while regulators conduct their environmental review.

If a temporary solution isn't found, the planting restrictions are likely to cause major headaches for sugar beet growers and food processors.

The genetically altered sugar beets provide about one-half of the U.S. sugar supply and some farmers have warned there aren't enough conventional seeds and herbicide to fill the void. The scientific seeds account for about 95 percent of the current sugar beet crop in the U.S.

"The value of sugar beet crops is critically important to rural communities and their economies," the Sugar Industry Biotech Council said Saturday.

White expressed little sympathy for any disruption his decision might cause. He noted in his 10-page ruling that regulators had time to prepare for the disruption because he had already overturned the deregulation of the genetically altered beets in a decision issued last September.

The Agriculture Department "has already had more than sufficient time to take interim measures, but failed to act expediently," White wrote.

Organic farmers, food safety advocates and conservation groups contend genetically altered crops such as the sugar beets could share their genes with conventionally grown food, such as chard and table beets.

Those arguments helped persuade another federal judge in San Francisco to stop the planting of genetically altered alfalfa seeds in 2007 pending a full environmental review that still hasn't been completed.

Monsanto took that case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in June overturned an injunction against the company's sale of the modified seeds.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: christine, farmfriend, CadetD, wudidiz, HighLairEon, TwentyTwelve, James Deffenbach, Jethro Tull, Horse, Lod, Kamala, Eric Stratton, HAPPY2BEME4UM, randge, X-15, scrapper2, AllTheKingsHorses, FormerLurker, Itistoolate, Esso, ratcat, Cynicom, all (#0)

(((((McFuud Ping)))))

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   16:40:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

This is an important ruling on a couple of levels.

1. It will take untested, and potentially health threatening, GMO Sugar out of the food supply.

2. It establishes that the USDA, owned by Monsatan, does not have the final word.

The caveats of course are that the higher courts, such as the filthy treasonous swine infesting the Supreme Court, are owned by the special interests as well.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   16:43:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Original_Intent (#2)

It establishes that the USDA, owned by Monsatan, does not have the final word.

The caveats of course are that the higher courts, such as the filthy treasonous swine infesting the Supreme Court, are owned by the special interests as well.

Are you saying, "we lose"????

Again.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-16   16:49:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom, James Deffenbach, christine, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, CadetD, farmfriend, Kamala, all (#3)

Are you saying, "we lose"????

Again.

Possibly. There are variables. The anti-GMO coalition is growing rapidly and has some very bright minds. As well there has been significant activity here in Oregon in opposition to the growing of GMO Sugar Beets in particular. I think that in the end we will prevail, but it is going to be a fight. Monsatan has a big war chest and the Globalists are pushing this as part of their Food Control program.

The undercurrent here, which is not real to the programmed Sheeple, is that Food Control and increased mortality ARE part of the program. GMO Frankenfood is one of the ways that they intend to "cull the herd". Of course Organically Grown food will remain available to the well heeled elites. They will ensure that. That is one of the reasons Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are funding the Arctic Seed Vault to ensure non-GMO seeds are preserved in order to rebuild after killing off 5 or 6 BILLION people. This is also why the draconian so-called Food Safety Bill is being pushed as it would outlaw growing your own food, sharing that food, or trading that food. The reality here that people are not getting is that these people, Rotchilds and Rockefuckers, are DEAD serious about world control, and they want a much reduced and heavily controlled population of slaves.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   17:04:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Original_Intent (#4)

GMO Frankenfood is one of the ways that they intend to "cull the herd". !

I can't stop laffing... oh, that is a hum-dinger, a real knee-slapper!

Of course, you never get to "root cause" about an issue. Listen up, pal.... these giant corporations are creating farm-able products that require less water while being pest free. Why? Not to "cull the herd" as you suggest within your diatribe but to feed the increasing population base of the world that is experiencing a diminishing fresh water table while the average ambient temperatures are going up. Oh, and under these harsh conditions pests are increasing everywhere. Do I agree with the rapid pace of this technology? Of course not. But, what are we to do otherwise .... read your rants on the Internet or develop new methods of agricultural? Do you have any idea of the silliness of your suggestions?

Man, you never seem to end with a few unintended jokes to throw around. You truly are a comedian.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-16   18:04:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Great news!

It is way, way past time to stop the cs'ers at Monsanto.

From corn to beans, to any other crop that they try to get patents on.

Round-Up Ready, my ass.

Lod  posted on  2010-08-16   18:13:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent (#4)

This is also why the draconian so-called Food Safety Bill is being pushed as it would outlaw growing your own food, sharing that food, or trading that food.

BUSTED!

12/18/2009--Reported to Senate amended. FDA Food Safety Modernization Act - Title I - Improving Capacity to Prevent Food Safety Problems Section 101 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to inspect records related to food, including to: (1) allow the inspection of records of food that the Secretary reasonably believes is likely to be affected in a similar manner as an adulterated food; and (2) require that each person (excluding farms and restaurants) who manufactures, processes, packs, distributes, receives, holds, or imports an article of food permit inspection of his or her records if the Secretary believes that there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to such food will cause serious adverse health consequences or death. Section 102 - Authorizes the Secretary to suspend the registration of a food facility if the food manufactured, processed, packed, or held by a facility has a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. Section 103 - Requires each owner, operator, or agent in charge of a food facility to: (1) evaluate the hazards that could affect food; (2) identify and implement preventive controls; (3) monitor the performance of those controls; and (4) maintain records of such monitoring. Deems facilities required to comply with certain food-specific standards to be in compliance with this section. Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to establish science-based minimum standards for conducting a hazard analysis, documenting hazards, implementing preventive controls, and documenting such implementation. Prohibits the operation of a facility that manufactures, processes, packs, or holds food for sale in the United States if the owner, operator, or agent in charge of such facility is not in compliance with this section. Delays implementation of this section for small businesses. Section 104 - Directs the Secretary to: (1) review and evaluate relevant health data and other information to determine the most significant foodborne contaminants; and (2) issue contaminant-specific and science-based guidance documents, action levels, or regulations. Section 105 - Sets forth provisions related to produce safety, including to require the Secretary to: (1) establish science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities to minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death; and (2) publish updated good agricultural practices and guidance for the safe production and harvesting of specific types of fresh produce. Section 106 - Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to protect against the intentional adulteration of food. Section 107 - Directs the Secretary to assess and collect fees related to: (1) food facility reinspection; (2) food recalls; (3) the voluntary qualified importer program; and (4) importer reinspection. Applies export certification provisions to food. Section 108 - Requires the Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to prepare and submit to the relevant congressional committees and make public the National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy, which shall include: (1) an implementation plan; (2) a coordinated research agenda; and (3) a process to achieve, and evaluate progress towards, goals. Section 109 - Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) to report annually on the activities of the Food and Agriculture Government Coordinating Council and the Food and Agriculture Sector Coordinating Council. Section 110 - Requires the HHS Secretary to submit to Congress: (1) a comprehensive report that identifies programs and practices that are intended to promote the safety and supply chain security of food and to prevent outbreaks of foodborne illness and other food-related hazards that can be addressed through preventive activities; and (2) biennial reports on food safety programs and practices following the submission of the comprehensive report. Requires the HHS Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to submit to Congress, biennially, a joint food safety and food defense research plan. Section 111 - Requires the HHS Secretary to promulgate regulations on sanitary transportation practices for the transportation of food. Section 112 - Requires the Secretary to develop and make available to local educational agencies, schools, early childhood education programs, and interested entities and individuals guidelines for developing plans for individuals to manage the risk of food allergy and anaphylaxis in schools and early childhood education programs, to be implemented on a voluntary basis. Sets forth issues for such guidelines to address, including: (1) parental obligation to provide documentation of their child's food allergy; (2) the creation of an individual plan for food allergy management; (3) communication strategies between schools or childhood education programs and providers of emergency medical services; and (4) strategies to reduce the risk of exposure to anaphylactic causative agents in classrooms and common school or early childhood education program areas, such as cafeterias. Allows the Secretary to award matching grants to assist local educational agencies in implementing such food allergy and anaphylaxis management guidelines. Title II - Improving Capacity to Detect and Respond to Food Safety Problems Section 201 - Requires the Secretary to: (1) allocate resources to inspect facilities and articles of food imported into the United States based on their risk profiles; (2) increase the frequency of inspection of all facilities; and (3) report to the appropriate congressional committees annually on food facility and food import inspections. Section 202 - Requires the Secretary to: (1) recognize bodies that accredit laboratories with a demonstrated capability to conduct analytical testing of food products; (2) establish a publicly available registry of accreditation bodies; (3) develop model standards that an accreditation body shall require laboratories to meet; and (4) periodically reevaluate accreditation bodies and revoke recognition of any not in compliance with this section. Sets forth requirements for mandatory testing, including that: (1) testing be conducted by federal laboratories or accredited nonfederal laboratories; and (2) results of such testing be sent directly to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Requires the Secretary to review results from any sampling and testing that lead to a state or locality issuing a food recall to evaluate the need for a national recall or other compliance and enforcement activities. Requires the Secretary to report to the relevant congressional committees on the progress in implementing a national food emergency response laboratory network. Section 203 - Directs the DHS Secretary to maintain an agreement through which relevant laboratory network members will: (1) agree on common laboratory methods in order to facilitate the sharing of knowledge and information; (2) identify means by which each member could work cooperatively to optimize national laboratory preparedness and provide surge capacity during emergencies; and (3) engage in ongoing dialogue and build relationships that will support a more effective and integrated response during emergencies. Sets forth reporting requirements. Section 204 - Requires the HHS Secretary to: (1) improve tracking and tracing of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities in the event of a foodborne illness outbreak; and (2) establish standards for the type of information, format, and timeframe for persons to submit records to aid the Secretary in such tracking and tracing. Section 205 - Requires the Secretary to establish a pilot project to explore and evaluate methods for rapidly and effectively tracking and tracing processed food so that the Secretary may quickly identify the source of an outbreak involving such a processed food and the recipients of the contaminated food. Section 206 - Requires the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to enhance foodborne illness surveillance systems to improve the collection, analysis, reporting, and usefulness of data on foodborne illnesses. Requires the Secretary to: (1) develop and implement strategies to leverage and enhance the food safety and defense capacities of state and local agencies to achieve specified goals, including improving foodborne illness outbreak response and containment; and (2) complete a review of state and local capacities and needs for enhancement not later than one year after enactment of this Act. Reauthorizes appropriations for grants to states and Indian tribes to expand participation in networks to enhance federal, state, and local food safety efforts, including meeting the costs of establishing and maintaining the food safety surveillance, technical, and laboratory capacity needed for such participation. Section 207 - Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) provide a responsible party with an opportunity to cease distribution and recall an adulterated or misbranded article of food if the use of or exposure to such article will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals; (2) order a responsible party to immediately cease distribution and provide notice to relevant persons if the responsible party does not voluntarily cease distribution of or recall such article of food; and (3) order a recall if the Secretary determines that removal of the article from commerce is necessary, but only after providing an opportunity for a hearing. Section 208 - Revises the standard for the administrative detention of food to allow such a detention if the FDA has reason to believe that such article is adulterated or misbranded. Section 209 - Requires the Administration of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide support for, and technical assistance to, state, local, and tribal governments in preparing for, assessing, decontaminating, and recovering from an agriculture or food emergency. Section 210 - Requires the Secretary to set standards and administer training and education programs for the employees of state, local, territorial, and tribal food safety officials relating to the regulatory responsibilities and policies established by this Act. Authorizes and encourages the Secretary to conduct examinations, testing, and investigations for the purposes of determining compliance with the food safety provisions of this Act through the officers and employees of such state, local, territorial, or tribal agency. Section 211 - Expands the program for grants to states, territories, and Indian tribes for inspections to include grants to: (1) train to HHS standards for the examination, inspection, and investigation of food manufacturing, processing, packing, holding, distribution, and importation; (2) build the capacity of the laboratories for food safety; (3) build the infrastructure and capacity of the food safety programs; and (4) take appropriate action to protect the public health in response to a recall of food under the FFDCA. Title III - Improving the Safety of Imported Food Section 301 - Requires U.S. importers to perform risk-based foreign supplier verification activities to verify that imported food is produced in compliance with applicable requirements related to hazard analysis and standards for produce safety and is not adulterated or misbranded. Requires the Secretary to issue guidance to assist U.S. importers in developing foreign supplier verification programs. Section 302 - Requires the Secretary to: (1) establish a program to provide for the expedited review and importation of food offered for importation by U.S. importers who have voluntarily agreed to participate in such program; and (2) issue a guidance document related to participation and compliance with such program. Section 303 - Requires imported food that fails to meet requirements for a certification or other assurance that the food meets applicable FFDCA requirements to be refused admission. Authorizes the Secretary to require, as a condition of granting admission to an article of food into the United States, that an entity provide a certification or other assurances that the article of food complies with applicable FFDCA requirements. Section 304 - Directs the Secretary to require, prior to importation of an article of food, notice of any country to which such article has been refused entry. Section 305 - Requires the Secretary to determine whether a country can provide reasonable assurances that the food supply of the country meets or exceeds the safety of food manufactured, processed, packed, or held in the United States. Section 306 - Directs the Secretary to develop a comprehensive plan to expand the technical, scientific, and regulatory capacity of foreign governments and food industries from which foods are exported to the United States. Section 307 - Authorizes the Secretary to enter into arrangements and agreements with foreign governments to facilitate the inspection of registered foreign facilities. Requires the Secretary to direct resources to inspections of foreign facilities, supplies, and food types to help ensure the safety and security of the U.S. food supply. Requires food to be refused admission into the United States if permission to inspect the food facility is denied by the facility owner, operator, or agent or the foreign country. Section 308 - Sets forth provisions governing the establishment of a system to recognize bodies that accredit third-party auditors and audit agents to certify that eligible entities meet applicable FFDCA requirements for importation of food into the United States. Section 309 - Requires the Secretary to establish offices of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in foreign countries to provide assistance to the appropriate governmental entities with respect to measures to provide for the safety of articles of food and other products regulated by the FDA that are exported by such countries to the United States. Section 310 - Requires the Secretary to: (1) develop and implement a strategy to better identify sand prevent entry into the United States of smuggled food; and (2) notify the DHS Secretary not later than ten days after identifying a smuggled food that would cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. Requires a press release to warn consumers and vendors about a potential threat from smuggled food if certain requirements are met. Title IV - Miscellaneous Provisions Section 401 - Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2014 for the activities of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, the Center for Veterinary Medicine, and related field activities in the Office of Regulatory Affairs of the FDA. Directs the HHS Secretary to increase the field staff of such Centers and Office. Section 402 - Establishes whistleblower protections for employees of entities involved in the manufacturing, processing, packing, transporting, distribution, reception, holding, or importation of food who provide information relating to any violation of the FFDCA. Section 404 - Declares that nothing in this Act shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party. Section 405 - Requires the Secretary to update the Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards and Control Guidance to take into account advances in technology. Section 406 - Requires the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, to study the transportation of food for consumption in the United States, including an examination of the unique needs of rural and frontier areas with regard to the delivery of safe food.
It is all about processing plants and distribution. As you may know, with an increasing population base having their food processed at centralized areas increasing scrutiny is required for continuing publick safety.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-16   18:19:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: buckeroo, Buckmonster Fullofit, Nostradumbass, abraxas, Critter, James Deffenbach, FormerLurker, wudidiz, IRTorqued, christine, farmfriend, all (#5)

Do you have any idea of the silliness of your suggestions?

Do you have any idea of the level of ignorance your comments prove? Obviously not, in your blithe and unthinking ignorance and regurgitation of industry talking points and misinformation as is most frequently the case you are a fount of frauds and fallacies.

ImageHost.org

Buckie's considered opinion.

YouTube - Health Ranger interviews Jeffrey Smith about dangers of GMOs

Who's Afraid of GMO's?

The Myths Of Agricultural Biotechnology: Some Ethical Questions

Excerpt: The agrochemical corporations which control the direction and goals of agricultural innovation through biotechnology claim that genetic engineering will enhance the sustainability of agriculture by solving the very problems affecting conventional farming and will spare Third World farmers from low productivity, poverty and hunger (Molnar and Kinnucan 1989, Gresshoft 1996). By matching myth with reality the following section describes how and why current developments in agricultural biotechnology do not measure up to such promises and expectations.

Risks of GM Food - Professor David Schubert of the Salk Institute offers insight and words of caution.

Genetically Modified Foods are Inherently Unsafe

Monsanto Corn Unfit For Consumption - MON863, approved and on the market, caused serious damage to the liver and kidneys of rats which consumed it during feeding trials. Read the abstract and commentary.

As for the myth that they increase productivity:

GM crop produces lower yield, says scientist

Do GM Crops Increase Yield? The Answer is No

GM crops failed

Genetically Modified Foods Not Good Economically Either?

2009 GM Crop Facts

I could very easily produce another hundred links about the health risks, dangers, and lies used to promote them, of GMO crops. However, I suspect that as with most issues you will rigidly follow the Party Lyin'.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   19:32:45 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Lod, all, *The Freedom4um Cook Book* (#6)

Great news!

It is way, way past time to stop the cs'ers at Monsanto.

From corn to beans, to any other crop that they try to get patents on.

Round-Up Ready, my ass.

Yes, "Round-up Ready". Gosh how wonderful. Of course another side effect from using "Round-up Ready" crops has been to produce a new generation of Round-up Ready super weeds.

Monsanto and the Roundup Ready Controversy
From SourceWatch

(Note: In addition to the issues raised on this page, there are a host of other concerns with genetic modification. Furthermore, the issues and statistics in the fast-paced biotech world are ever in flux. The reader is encouraged to visit the other websites here for more and up-to-date info.)

Monsanto is considered the Mother of agricultural biotechnology (1). Their "Roundup Ready" crops have been genetically engineered to permit direct, "over the top" application of the Monsanto herbicide glyphosate allowing farmers to drench both their crops and crop land with the herbicide so as to be able to kill nearby weeds (and any other green thing the herbicide touches) without killing the crops (2). "RR soybeans are heavily herbicide dependent" [1] [2] says Charles M. Benbrook, an expert in the field [3].

This is because the "Roundup Ready System" is primarily a "no-till" system. Rather than the traditional tilling of the ground to control weeds the RR system relies on its herbicide to control them, "No-till cropping systems are the most demanding with regards to weed control. The crop is seeded directly into untilled soil with no follow-up cultivation. Weed control depends entirely on herbicides" [4].

In fact, the Roundup Ready System was specifically designed to require the exclusive use of Monsanto's herbicide, Roundup, primarily, some say, to increase profits for Monsanto - and at almost 250 million GM acres worldwide which all require Roundup that's a lot of profit [5]. Says David Ehrenfield, Professor of Biology at Rutgers University, "Genetic Engineering is often justified as a human technology, one that feeds more people with better food. Nothing could be further from the truth. With very few exceptions, the whole point of genetic engineering is to increase sales of chemicals and bio-engineered products to dependent farmers" [6]. "In the United States, the widespread adoption of Roundup Ready crops combined with the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds has driven a more than 15-fold increase in the use of glyphosate on major field crops from 1994 to 2005" [7] pdf.

The draw for farmers is the promised reduced cost, and increased yield and thus extra profit over traditional systems. Says this Monsanto blurb "no-till soybeans grown in narrow rows add $16 per acre more to a grower's bottom line than conventional soybeans.... On a 1,000 acre farm, no-till can save as much as 450 hours of time and 3,500 gallons of diesel fuel each year. That's 11, 40-hour weeks in time savings and $4,000 less for diesel at $1.15 per gallon" [8]. However the weed control advantage of the no-till vs. conventional system has been disputed [9].

BTW here is a useful reference: The Non-GMO Shopping Guide

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   19:46:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Good. We need to get rid of these GM crops. Most anything from the evil Monsanto corporation.

Across the Dakotas, the GM canola is going crazy. We'll be lucky if it doesn't turn into a total biohazard to normal grasses and plants.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-08-16   20:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Lod (#6)

Round-Up Ready, my ass.

I'd bet Monsanto has an evil program to develop a product line of Round-Up Ready toilet paper.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-08-16   20:13:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Original_Intent (#9)

Damn!

Thank you for all this information.

Lod  posted on  2010-08-16   20:23:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Original_Intent (#8)

Why are you disparaging the jackass? You have to know he is smarter than buck of the loose screw.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-16   20:39:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: buckeroo, Buckmonster Fullofit, Nostradumbass, abraxas, Critter, James Deffenbach, FormerLurker, wudidiz, IRTorqued, christine, farmfriend, all (#7)

This is also why the draconian so-called Food Safety Bill is being pushed as it would outlaw growing your own food, sharing that food, or trading that food.

BUSTED!

The only thing "BUSTED" here is your moral compass and cognitive functions. As you proved previously your total and abysmal ignorance upon the issues mentioned is nearly complete. Of course you have to make it all the more blatant by loudly and obnoxiously parading your ignorance while proving you have the manners of a braying Jackass.

S 510 is hissing in the grass

Excerpt: ...“If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower

It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food.

Monsanto says it has no interest in the bill and would not benefit from it, but Monsanto’s Michael Taylor who gave us rBGH and unregulated genetically modified (GM) organisms, appears to have designed it and is waiting as an appointed Food Czar to the FDA (a position unapproved by Congress) to administer the agency it would create — without judicial review — if it passes. S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming."...

..."constitutional, and human survival grounds.

1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.

2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:

COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.

Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.

4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.

5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.

6. It includes NAIS (My Note: National Animal Identification System. NAIS This would require EVERY non-wild animal in the U.S. to be tracked and registered, including pets, and would destroy small farmers through a maze of paperwork and draconian penalities.), an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations." ...

Gabriel Cousens, M.D.: Defend your Dinner - Fight Senate Bill 510 ...

Food Safety Modernization Act: The End of Homegrown Produce ...

Food Safety on the Farm: Federal Programs and Selected Proposals

Why We MUST Stop S510 Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 ...

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   21:06:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Lod (#12)

Damn!

Thank you for all this information.

You are welcome. These are all issues I'm sensitized to as an avid gourmet Kitchen Gardener. This first starting really popping up on the horizon as a real problem in the late 90's and it is getting worse as Monsatan, which sells 90% of all GMO seeds, is working hard at establishing total dominance in the production of food.

Other side issues include something surfacing recently, anecdotally from Veterinarians, is that animals raised on GMO fodder suffer a whole host of ills which are cured within a couple of weeks by discontinuing the GMO fodder - which pretty well proves the link.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   21:11:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Original_Intent (#14)

As always, EVERTHING you post has no credence in FACT.... but it does have credence in FICTION. Sometimes, I wonder if you can distinguish between the two...

GMO Frankenfood is one of the ways that they intend to "cull the herd". !

This is also why the draconian so-called Food Safety Bill is being pushed as it would outlaw growing your own food, sharing that food, or trading that food.

I already quoted the summary (and a HOTLINK) .... not some set of selected BS artists that you blindly swallow because you have no concept about the issues.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-16   21:13:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: James Deffenbach, Nostradumbass, all (#13)

Why are you disparaging the jackass? You have to know he is smarter than buck of the loose screw.

You are right. I apologize to the Jackass for the unsavory association.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   21:14:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: TooConservative (#10)

Good. We need to get rid of these GM crops. Most anything from the evil Monsanto corporation.

Across the Dakotas, the GM canola is going crazy. We'll be lucky if it doesn't turn into a total biohazard to normal grasses and plants.

Yes, the GMO crops, while not without potential, are at this point in time a biohazard. I was reading earlier today about how some of the GMO plants have gotten loose and are now showing up in the wild. This does not augur good for the environment. The only saving grace is that they are also genetically unstable and in time will revert to type, but in the short run they are a hazard. Monsatan is the epitomy of the amoral soulless corporate crony capitalist seeking to use government to establish a near monopoly. They must be stopped. I would like to see their management hung, but would settle for life behind bars.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   21:18:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Original_Intent (#17)

You are right. I apologize to the Jackass for the unsavory association.

I am sure the jackass would be glad if you don't let that happen again.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-16   21:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Original_Intent (#18)

Yes, the GMO crops, while not without potential, are at this point in time a biohazard.

ROTFL

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-16   21:30:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Original_Intent (#1)

Thank you for the ping.

I've been buying beets to make vegetable juice lately and noticed the non-organic beets are much bigger than I remember beets ever being.

It's a shame a guy has to wade through the shit droppings of the forum's resident stooge just to read this thread.

I think I'll put the bozo feature to use again.


I ran out of smart sounding quotes

wudidiz  posted on  2010-08-16   22:15:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: wudidiz (#21) (Edited)

You're welcome.

It's a shame a guy has to wade through the shit droppings of the forum's resident stooge just to read this thread.

True that. However, it did give me the opportunity to post a lot more data and a cute look-alike picture of a braying Jackass. :-)

I think I'll put the bozo feature to use again.

I can't say that I blame you, but seeing what the Jackass has to bray does provide an opportunity to see what the official disinformation talking points are.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   22:23:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Original_Intent (#22)

Who owns Monsanto?

"The 'uniter' has brought the entire world together - to despise and deride us." lod

Bub  posted on  2010-08-16   23:05:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Bub (#23)

Good question. I could be flippant and say "the stockholders", but that would be flip. I've never researched out who the majority stockholders are. I've thought about it, but have never followed through on it.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-08-16   23:17:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#3)

Are you saying, "we lose"????

Again.

LOL - well said.

scrapper2  posted on  2010-08-17   2:39:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]