4um: Oath Keepers prep lawsuit against NH bureaucrats

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News
See other National News Articles
Title: Oath Keepers prep lawsuit against NH bureaucrats
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 16, 2010
Author: Ridley
Post Date: 2010-10-16 22:25:38 by RidleyReport
Keywords: None
Views: 322
Comments: 35

From RidleyReport.com
After using Oath Keepers affiliation as one excuse for taking a baby, New Hampshire's child protective division is now the target of a planned lawsuit. Oath Keepers is a group of current/former military/police who pledge they won't follow unconstitutional orders.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwxLUUkZnU4
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#7. To: RidleyReport (#0)
I am personally very pleased how quickly Steward Rhodes was able to put together a team of OathKeeper professionals to deal with this baby issue. Let's sick that team on the ADL and SPLC. Since when is a militia a bad thing, anyway. Militia... where have I read that term before.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
In order for a free State to be secure, a group of citizens, not part of the regular army, need to train and become proficient like soldiers. Therefore, the people's right to own and carry weapons shall not be violated.

wakeup posted on 2010-10-17 1:00:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: wakeup (#7) (Edited)
I am personally very pleased how quickly Steward Rhodes was able to put together a team of OathKeeper professionals to deal with this baby issue.

You missed the boat, pal. Rhodes is only interested in the claim within an affidavit that is legally signed by a judge that uses or otherwise politicizes the good name of the Oath Keepers as a reason or as substantial proof for any reason (outside the solid foundation of the group) which potentially cools first amendment rights, not just for the Oath Keepers but also any political group.

Since when is a militia a bad thing, anyway. Militia... where have I read that term before.

The Oath Keepers are not in any way associated with militias; perhaps individual members are but that is a moot point.

buckeroo posted on 2010-10-17 1:37:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#9. To: buckeroo (#8)
Maybe we'll finally find out why they even used OK as a reason to take the baby. I haven't seen or heard the reason(s) for that yet. Either it was the result of stupidity or there is a more sinister reason for it.
.

PSUSA posted on 2010-10-17 7:04:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: PSUSA (#9) (Edited)
Maybe we'll finally find out why they even used OK as a reason to take the baby. I haven't seen or heard the reason(s) for that yet. Either it was the result of stupidity or there is a more sinister reason for it.

Irish has a long list of known violent issues. Taylor has already given up two other children to CPS. So both are well known by local administrative and law enforcement agencies. As an opinion, the CPS just threw the book at Irish to ensure custodial characterization about Cheyenne. Here is the affidavit:

Irish Court Order and Affidavit
The bottom line, the CPS got their "wires" crossed about the Oath Keepers. They just used every possible reason to take custody of the child.

buckeroo posted on 2010-10-17 7:54:32 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: buckeroo (#10) (Edited)
Here is the affidavit:

Redacted all to hell. It's useless. I don't like it when people hide relevant information. It makes me ask "why?".
Interesting video. It gives a possible reason how OK came to be mentioned in the affidavit. It's a reason that makes sense. However, they did not exercise due diligence in verifying this information. They just took it at face value and ran with it. That was a mistake in one persons judgment, and not sinister in any way, imo.
And now the son is threatening the father.
White trash? Sounds like it to me.
.

PSUSA posted on 2010-10-17 8:41:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 11.
#12. To: PSUSA (#11)
White trash?

Both Irish AND Taylor are the lowest common denominator of human scum. Imagine a woman giving up her two children for a violent punk running a muck and still has a third child from the same social-path/maniac; it makes you wonder about these two; I wager they vote, too.

buckeroo posted on 2010-10-17 08:52:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um