Title: What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread623285/pg1 Published:Oct 26, 2010 Author:n Post Date:2010-10-26 15:14:55 by gengis gandhi Keywords:None Views:326 Comments:8
The second dumbest creature on the face of the earth is the one who cannot recognize its enemies. The most stupid of all is the one who will defend and collaborate with the very enemies that are destroying it and its own kind. -Ben Klassen
Indeed. At second six, half the starboard wing just disappears right before impact.
This stuff is nuts.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
in the early 70's, videocams & television technology was such that the frames per second etc. made for a much grainier picture. this would probably explain away much of this 9/11/71 footage. A lifetime has passed since then. get over it & move on.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:3113:13 "I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him" George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
Now compare those videos (with 3 booms in the first example and no soundtrack in the second timecoded example) to this one from a different angle farther away, which has an identical timecoding format as the silent 2nd example but only 1 boom sound after "impact" instead of the 3 booms heard in the 1st example above. Both soundtracks are delayed but it's not very likely that both soundtracks can be true. Distance doesn't explain the discrepancy because the 1 boom heard in the video below that is farther away is actually much louder than the 3 booms in example #1: