Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Ugly Women and Poor Men
Source: UncleBob's Treehouse
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 18, 2011
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2011-01-18 14:00:26 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 795
Comments: 37

There are two kinds of people who are basically disposable: unattractive women and economically unsuccessful men.

In college I knew a woman, who verged on beautiful, who mentioned to me once that seven guys had asked her out one weekend. I knew another one, who was very attractive, who was very popular – I believe over 30 guys asked her out.

I also knew several who weren’t attractive, and never got asked out. Attractiveness (and friendliness) was what made the popular women popular. The unattractive ones didn’t stand a chance, although I suppose unattractive guys finally asked them out.

For men, those who are economically unsuccessful are disposable. If a man cannot support himself, no one else will, so he can just become homeless and die. This is why, when the economy goes bad and men lose their jobs, the suicide rate goes up for them. They’re on their own.

In the past, unattractive women could be nurses or schoolteachers. I’m not sure what else was open to them. Secretaries. These days, women, because of Affirmative Action and other laws, have the traditional male role now open to them, so they now have access to high-paying, fairly easy inside jobs.

Yet, at the same time, access to the traditional female role is not open to men. I’m sure there are a few financially successful women who are open to it, but if there are, it’s just a handful, and I’ve never met one.

So what happens is that an unattractive woman can now support herself with a high-paying job, but a economically unsuccessful man is still on his own. The woman has become less disposable, but not the man.

Men in general have always been more disposable than women, apparently because women are the ones who give birth. But now, the imbalance has become even worse.

Can such a balance continue? I don’t think I can. Something will give, sooner or later, and then things will change. But I expect things to get a lot worse before they get better.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#11. To: Turtle (#0)

This is a good read. And I see much truth in it.

The part that gets my attention is this: "Men in general have always been more disposable than women, apparently because women are the ones who give birth. But now, the imbalance has become even worse."

I sense this imbalance may have something to do with discouraging people to pro-create.

purplerose  posted on  2011-01-18   14:45:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#12. To: purplerose (#11)

I sense this imbalance may have something to do with discouraging people to pro-create.

A worse imbalance is that women have children on their own and pretend they're not dependent on the government (marrying the government) or are parasites on their parents.

A single woman with children has never been economically or socially viable in any culture in history.

Turtle  posted on  2011-01-18 14:51:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: purplerose, abraxas, Turdle, Turtle, all (#11)

The part that gets my attention is this: "Men in general have always been more disposable than women, apparently because women are the ones who give birth. But now, the imbalance has become even worse."

Robert Heinlein suggested, and I tend to agree, that you can kill off a sizable chunk of the male population and still have the human race survive and that is what makes them expendable. Women have a monopoly on child bearing, and require protection while with child and in raising them.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-01-18 15:10:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest