Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Star Eyewitness who named Queen of England in Abduction of Aboriginal Children Dies Suddenly!
Source: Pagan Media
URL Source: http://paganmedia.wordpress.com/201 ... iginal-children-dies-suddenly/
Published: Mar 7, 2011
Author: Pagan Media
Post Date: 2011-03-07 23:10:20 by Original_Intent
Keywords: Native, genocide, slavery, Queen
Views: 79

Star Eyewitness who named Queen of England in Abduction of Aboriginal Children Dies suddenly!

~ Aris- Arnelle Durocher~

There seems to be an awful lot of  eyewitnesses, survivors and victims of the Residential School murders in Canada dying all of a sudden. Those that are scheduled to testify. Is this coincidental? The truth will come out no matter what happens. There is nowhere for anybody to hide the truth anymore and it is better that those that have knowledge of the truth and helped to hide the truth about the murders of Aboriginal people in residential schools, speak about it and acknowledge it.  If the allegation that the Queen and her husband took 10 Canadian Native children away with them is true , it proves how people of money and caucasion people in general treated minorties/aboriginals as common “chattal”!  How society thought and continue to proceed with First Nations people. How the caucasion people of privledge  felt they had ownership on Natives; and on that term, an embodiment of Xian slavery also took place with forced attendance in residential schools, being ripped away from their parents, family and cultural and even taken away to other countries. That is also slavery!  Never once  did society think about the real blood families of these children, never once thinking  or perhaps not caring that they were participating in cultural genocide and genocide that annihilated an estimated 120 million Natives across North America.

This  fight which is taken a legal turn is about the 50,000 Native children who are missing in Canada. If the Queen is the Queen of Canada  as well then shouldn’t our Queen stand up for justice of Aboriginals peoples? Are Aboriginals not her people as well? It seems that the British have a long dark history of inhumane treatment of other peoples, Aboriginals, Irish, Scottish etc..  while trying to take over these countries. Acknowledging the truth will allow the healing process of all nations to begin. History can no longer be revoked by legislative and royal authority. This is about the people’s brutish history which is the truth of what happened to 120 million First Nations people across North America. This is no longer protecting the sovereign and the” defeated ideologies” of Church and State rule that caused mankind to suffer under great depths of brutality and depravation. Human suffering is never justified in its history.  Fifty thousand plus little defenceless First Nations children have a right to be represented and heard under Canadian law, indeed under British law and the United Nations. Their surviving families have a right by Canadian jurisprudence to know where their missing children are buried.The surviving families have the right to give these children a tradional Native burial unlike the unmarked mass graves where these children were raped, murdered and thrown in the ground like garbage,without a fleeting thought by the dominant of society of the so called upper class of society.


This video” Winds of Change” is dedicated to the passing of William Combes who fought for justice for Aboriginal Children and all First Nations people across North America alongside Kevin Annett. RIP brother.

We have all seen over time how crimes against humanity was bestowed on people because of the aristocratic domination. It would disappointing to me if the Queen did not stand up for what is right and just. I always liked our Queen, I always thought she was handed one of the worst jobs in mankind, sovereign and royal, under intense public scrutiny that she was born into and that she did the best that she could with what she was taught, she was given no choices in being Queen or in her life, it was her fate and destiny from the moment she was born. That she was handed the brutish reins of her ancestors legacies of tyranny of a barbarous ancestoral royal rule and past. A British Royal past of her ancestors who targeted and set out to own other nations and peoples. So it disturbs me and upsets me to read that my Queen would take part in any disparging actions against First Nations who are of my ancestory. My ideology of a true Queen is one that stands for the rights of all people seeking justice on behalf of her people. A Queen of truth that would admitt to wrong doing to other people/her people, if true. I do hope to see that in Canada’s Queen Elizabeth II in the near future.


Star Eyewitness who named Queen of England in  alleged Abduction of Aboriginal Children
Dies suddenly in Vancouver Hospital A Special Report by Kevin D. Annett March 1, 2011:

William Combes, Eyewitness, 1952-2011 Vancouver, Canada: The aboriginal man who claimed to witness the abduction of ten fellow residential school children by the Queen of England and her husband in October, 1964 at the Catholic school in Kamloops, B.C. has died suddenly at the Catholic-run St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver. William Combes, age 59 and in good health, was scheduled to be a primary witness at the opening session of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) on September 12 in London, England. I last saw William ten days ago, on the eve of my departure for a European speaking tour, and he looked better than I had seen him in years. According to his partner Mae, William was in stable health and was assigned a new doctor at St. Paul’s Hospital this past week. William was then committed to the hospital for “tests”, and his health began to immediately deteriorate. He died suddenly yesterday of a still-undisclosed cause. The Vancouver Coroner’s Office refuses to comment on William’s death.

William was the sole survivor of a group of three aboriginal boys who claim to have witnessed the abduction of ten children during a royal visit to the Kamloops residential school in mid October, 1964, when both the Queen and Prince Philip were in Canada. “They took away those ten kids and nobody ever saw them again” described William, in several public statements made over the airwaves of my former Vancouver Co-op radio program, and in the following signed and witnessed declaration made on February 3, 2010: I am an Interior Salish spirit dancer and am 58 years old. I live in Vancouver, Canada. I am a survivor of the Kamloops and Mission Indian residential schools, both run by the Roman Catholic church. I suffered terrible tortures there at the hands especially of Brother Murphy, who killed at least two children. I witnessed him throw a child off a three story balcony to her death. He put me on a rack and broke some of my bones, in the Kamloop school basement, after I tried running away. I also saw him and another priest burying a child in the school orchard one night. In October, 1964 when I was 12 years old, I was an inmate at the Kamloops school and we were visited by the Queen of England and Prince Phillip. I remember it was strange because they came by themselves, no big fanfare or nothing. But I recognized them and the school principal told us it was the Queen and we all got given new clothes and good food for the first time in months the day before she arrived.


The day the Queen got to the school, I was part of a group of kids that went on a picnic with her and her husband and some of the priests, down to a meadow near Dead Man’s Creek. I remember it was weird because we all had to bend down and kiss her foot, a white laced boot. After awhile, I saw the Queen leave the picnic with ten children from the school, and those kids never returned. We never heard anything more about them and never met them again even when we were older. They were all from around there but they all vanished. The group that disappeared was seven boys and three girls, in age from six to fourteen years old. They were all from the smart group in class. Two of the boys were brothers and they were Metis from Quesnel. Their last name was Arnuse or Arnold. I don’t remember the others, just an occasional first name like Cecilia and there was an Edward.


What happened was also witnessed by my friend George Adolph, who was 11 years old at the time and a student there too. But he’s dead now. I believe that William Combes died of foul play, and that his murder was arranged by those who stood to lose from his speaking out about his witnessing of the child abductions and other crimes of murder and torture at Catholic Indian residential schools. I am writing a soon to be issued eulogy for my friend and fellow fighter, William Arnold Combes. Like another murdered front line native activist, Johnny Bingo Dawson, who was killed by the Vancouver police in 2009, William will never be forgotten – and those who killed him will, like the system that caused the death of so many children, be brought to real justice. His murderers have not won. William’s videotaped statements, including his witness of the 1964 abductions, have been registered in the archives of our ITCCS, and will be made public at our opening session on September 12, 2011. I will be proposing to the ITCCS executive that William Combes and Johnny Dawson both be named post-humous Honorary Elders of the Tribunal. In his name and memory, and for all the children.


See the evidence of Genocide in Canada at www.hiddennolonger.com and on the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org . Watch Kevin’s award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on his website www.hiddenfromhistory.org “We will bring to light the hidden works of darkness and drive falsity to the bottomless pit. For all doctrines founded in fraud or nursed by fear shall be confounded by Truth.” – Kevin’s ancestor Peter Annett, writing in The Free Inquirer, October 17, 1761, just before being imprisoned by the English crown for “blasphemous libel” “I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.” Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

Declaration on Rights of Minorties Office of the United Nations High Comissioner of Human Rights

Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities

Adopted by General Assembly resolution 47/135 of 18 December 1992

The General Assembly ,

Reaffirming that one of the basic aims of the United Nations, as proclaimed in the Charter, is to promote and encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,

Reaffirming faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small,

Desiring to promote the realization of the principles contained in the Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as other relevant international instruments that have been adopted at the universal or regional level and those concluded between individual States Members of the United Nations,

Inspired by the provisions of article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights concerning the rights of persons belonging to ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities,

Considering that the promotion and protection of the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities contribute to the political and social stability of States in which they live,

Emphasizing that the constant promotion and realization of the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities, as an integral part of the development of society as a whole and within a democratic framework based on the rule of law, would contribute to the strengthening of friendship and cooperation among peoples and States,

Considering that the United Nations has an important role to play regarding the protection of minorities,

Bearing in mind the work done so far within the United Nations system, in particular by the Commission on Human Rights, the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities and the bodies established pursuant to the International Covenants on Human Rights and other relevant international human rights instruments in promoting and protecting the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities,

Taking into account the important work which is done by intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations in protecting minorities and in promoting and protecting the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities,

Recognizing the need to ensure even more effective implementation of international human rights instruments with regard to the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities,

Proclaims this Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities:

Article 1

1. States shall protect the existence and the national or ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of minorities within their respective territories and shall encourage conditions for the promotion of that identity.

2. States shall adopt appropriate legislative and other measures to achieve those ends.

Article 2

1. Persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities (hereinafter referred to as persons belonging to minorities) have the right to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, and to use their own language, in private and in public, freely and without interference or any form of discrimination.

2. Persons belonging to minorities have the right to participate effectively in cultural, religious, social, economic and public life.

3. Persons belonging to minorities have the right to participate effectively in decisions on the national and, where appropriate, regional level concerning the minority to which they belong or the regions in which they live, in a manner not incompatible with national legislation.

4. Persons belonging to minorities have the right to establish and maintain their own associations.

5. Persons belonging to minorities have the right to establish and maintain, without any discrimination, free and peaceful contacts with other members of their group and with persons belonging to other minorities, as well as contacts across frontiers with citizens of other States to whom they are related by national or ethnic, religious or linguistic ties.

Article 3

1. Persons belonging to minorities may exercise their rights, including those set forth in the present Declaration, individually as well as in community with other members of their group, without any discrimination.

2. No disadvantage shall result for any person belonging to a minority as the consequence of the exercise or non-exercise of the rights set forth in the present Declaration.

Article 4

1. States shall take measures where required to ensure that persons belonging to minorities may exercise fully and effectively all their human rights and fundamental freedoms without any discrimination and in full equality before the law.

2. States shall take measures to create favourable conditions to enable persons belonging to minorities to express their characteristics and to develop their culture, language, religion, traditions and customs, except where specific practices are in violation of national law and contrary to international standards.

3. States should take appropriate measures so that, wherever possible, persons belonging to minorities may have adequate opportunities to learn their mother tongue or to have instruction in their mother tongue.

4. States should, where appropriate, take measures in the field of education, in order to encourage knowledge of the history, traditions, language and culture of the minorities existing within their territory. Persons belonging to minorities should have adequate opportunities to gain knowledge of the society as a whole.

5. States should consider appropriate measures so that persons belonging to minorities may participate fully in the economic progress and development in their country.

Article 5

1. National policies and programmes shall be planned and implemented with due regard for the legitimate interests of persons belonging to minorities.

2. Programs of cooperation and assistance among States should be planned and implemented with due regard for the legitimate interests of persons belonging to minorities.

Article 6

States should cooperate on questions relating to persons belonging to minorities, inter alia , exchanging information and experiences, in order to promote mutual understanding and confidence.

Article 7

States should cooperate in order to promote respect for the rights set forth in the present Declaration.

Article 8

1. Nothing in the present Declaration shall prevent the fulfilment of international obligations of States in relation to persons belonging to minorities. In particular, States shall fulfil in good faith the obligations and commitments they have assumed under international treaties and agreements to which they are parties.

2. The exercise of the rights set forth in the present Declaration shall not prejudice the enjoyment by all persons of universally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms.

3. Measures taken by States to ensure the effective enjoyment of the rights set forth in the present Declaration shall not prima facie be considered contrary to the principle of equality contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

4. Nothing in the present Declaration may be construed as permitting any activity contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations, including sovereign equality, territorial integrity and political independence of States.

Article 9

The specialized agencies and other organizations of the United Nations system shall contribute to the full realization of the rights and principles set forth in the present Declaration, within their respective fields of competence.

© OHCHR 1996-2007

http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/minorities.htm

© Copyright Truth Is Pagan Media That Bites 2007- 2011

Click for Full Text!

(8 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread