Explosives rocked FBI HQ in `87
Agency illegally stored foreign military devices
Wordlnetdaily
By Jon Dougherty
June 5, 2001
A series of blasts from illegally stored "foreign" and "military-type" explosives rocked the J. Edgar Hoover Building in Washington, D.C., in 1987, wiping out much of the FBI's third-floor crime lab, agency documents reveal.
The information was first reported June 1 by the McCurtain Daily Gazette newspaper and discovered by investigative reporters J. D. Cash and Roger Charles. The paper said it "has confirmed that in the spring of 1987, a series of explosives caused by the illegal storage of [foreign] military explosives rocked the FBI's sprawling complex" in the nation's capital.
The paper said it waged a four-year Freedom of Information Act battle with the FBI to learn about the details of the incident which, at the time, the agency reported as nothing more than a "small fire" in the middle of the night.
However, according to excerpts of a 197-page FBI report obtained by WND as well as the McCurtain paper's published report details of the May 5, 1987, incident provide a step-by-step account of what actually happened. (Click here to view cover of report.)
The FBI's report said a fire began in the lab around 4:00 a.m. "in the Explosives Unit." Investigators never found solid evidence of how the fire began, but officials, in the report, said a soldering iron may have been the cause.
In summarizing the incident, "investigators for the FBI and ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms] could not come to agreement on the catalyst that initiated the explosives," the paper said
However, "what is clear from the FBI's investigation" is that "FBI agents assigned to the lab failed to follow federal law and customary safety regulations regarding the proper storage of explosive devices
thereby risking the lives of hundreds of employees in the federal building," the paper said, quoting the report.
And, the paper noted, the final report "clearly" implicated a number "of FBI agents in a scandal involving the dangerous and illegal practice of storing high explosives in a public building" a practice both FBI and ATF officials have denied in recent interviews.
"I have no knowledge of that. I have never heard of that before," Steve Berry, a spokesman for the FBI, told WND, in response to whether the FBI ever stored explosives in its headquarters or field offices.
And Jim Crandell, an inspector and former field agent for the ATF, also denied knowledge of the ATF ever storing explosives inside the agency's offices located in federal buildings.
It is the agency's policy "not to store explosives in any of our offices," Crandall said. "We maintain explosives bunkers for" storage of explosive materials, he added, noting that the ATF sometimes uses local storage facilities operated by local law enforcement agencies. He did say that the agency stored some of its own weapons at its offices.
Berry specifically denied that explosives rocked the Hoover Building more than 13 years ago, and instead echoed the agency's previous explanation that a "fire" had caused only minor damage.
"There was a fire in '87 in
sort of the bomb center," he said. "There's some evidentiary
materials down there in the Bomb Data Center, but no one was injured."
But, the McCurtain paper, quoting the FBI report, said investigators concluded that the incident "was the result of a fire and detonation of a large cache of foreign-made military explosives that were present inside that federal building."
Among the items listed in the FBI's report as having been stored in the lab were rocket-propelled grenades, 122mm rocket fuzes and 30mm anti-aircraft ammunition.
In reviewing the report, the paper noted that "missiles and shrapnel blasted through evidence cabinets and tore gaping holes in the walls of the world-famous crime lab."
Tainted evidence
Worse, the paper said, the conflagration "destroyed evidence in [ongoing] criminal investigations" as well as "threatened the lives of FBI personnel and firefighters" called to contain the damage. Early on, one small explosion even knocked some firefighters back against a wall.
"And you know, defense lawyers were probably never told about the destruction" of evidence "in their cases," one source, who asked not to be identified, told WND.
The paper said evidence "in a number of criminal investigations" involving the Justice Department "was involved [and] was cross-contaminated by the detonation of high explosives and the resulting fire.
"
"A visual inspection of the evidence storage room in the Explosives Unit in the FBI Laboratory," the report said, "revealed evidence of a fire and the observable physical characteristics which are associated with the explosion of military-type ordnance."
The report went on to describe "small craters" in the "floor area between the rows of evidence cabinets," characteristic of damage caused by "122mm rocket fuzes." Also, "large holes" were found in evidence cabinets indicative of "the explosion of 122mm rocket fuzes."
FBI investigators, the report said, also found a hole in a wall "characteristic of having been produced by the explosion of a rocket-propelled grenade without the initiation of the base detonating fuze element.
"
"In essence, when the rocket hit the wall, the explosive in the warhead exploded from the force impact and not from the base fuze," the report said. "The blast and fragment damage to the surrounding area and the wall were produced from this exploding rocket."
Range of explosives kept in building
Besides the explosives that detonated, other explosives, the report said, were also being stored in the building. Had they ignited, experts told the McCurtain newspaper, the damage to the Hoover Building would have been much worse.
According to the McCurtain newspaper, the FBI report said a number of FBI agents assigned to the lab were eventually interviewed by investigators from the bureau, as well as the ATF. Agents provided details about other explosive materials they knew to have been stored there before the fire.
Investigators discovered that many of the explosives had been stored only in cardboard boxes and had been left sitting on the floor of the lab "for months" before the incident, the paper quoting the FBI's report said.
A partial list of those items that did not explode, according to the documents obtained by WND, included:
10 kilograms (22 pounds) of C-4 plastic high explosive; 2.5 kilograms (about 5 pounds) of TNT; About 2 kilograms (4 pounds) of PETN; Black powder safety fuse; Several six-inch strips of detonation cord. What did explode included "10 to 15 rounds of 30mm anti-aircraft ammunition; two or three military-type grenade igniting fuzes; three rocket-propelled grenades; 45 detonating fuzes; and 45 Soviet MRV 122mm rocket fuzes," the report said, as quoted by the McCurtain Daily Gazette.
Ed Horn, director of storage operations for the U.S. Army's large conventional munitions and ammunition facility in Crane, Ind., told the McCurtain newspaper that all military-type explosives had to be stored in earthen and steel-reinforced concrete bunkers to ensure their safety, should they accidentally detonate.
But under no circumstances, he said, should those types of munitions be stored in any federal building, secured or otherwise.
"All of [this] is absolutely crazy," Horn told the newspaper. "No one should bring high explosives into a federal building, much less store it there."
But, the paper said, quoting the agency's report, the FBI's practice of long-term storage of such munitions, at least in its own headquarters building in Washington, was "long held," according to agents interviewed in the aftermath of the incident.
"Although the special agent's name is redacted" from the report, the paper said, "the former head of the Explosives Lab
admitted to investigators that this deadly practice had been going on for quite some time."
The paper also said the agency's report noted that the special agent in charge of the lab told investigators he "inherited" the explosives from his predecessor.
Finally, the report did not recommend any punishment for FBI agents and managers responsible for the storage policies and for bringing the explosives into the building in the first place, according to passages quoted by the paper.
In a follow-up interview, an FBI spokesman, who did not identify himself, initially told WND that a "fire and perhaps one explosion" was all that occurred.
However, when pressed about details in the report, the spokesman abruptly ended the interview and said the agency would "get back to" WorldNetDaily.
THE FBI AND THE MAD BOMBERS
Letter to Editor: Missile stored at federal building
THE INDIANAPOLIS NEWS
March 26, 1998 Thursday HOME EDITION A.B. MAGNUS
Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.
Letter to Editor: Missile stored at federal building
A.B. MAGNUS THE INDIANAPOLIS NEWS March 26, 1998 Thursday HOME EDITION
An astounding fact just surfaced regarding the Oklahoma City bombing, yet I haven't seen it published in any newspaper. The development is so disturbing that Americans should be screaming out at their elected officials demanding to know why they have not held congressional investigations to prevent such a coverup of facts surrounding the worst ever act of terrorism on U.S. soil. On Feb. 26, 1998, Oklahoma Deputy Bomb Squad Sgt. Bill Grimsley testified under oath in a deposition that a Tow Missile had indeed been stored in the Murrah Federal Building prior to the explosion.
A transfer report of the bomb squad, dated April 19, 1995, the day of the bombing that killed 169 innocent citizens of Oklahoma, bearing signatures of FBI agents verified the grim testimony of Sgt. Grimsley.
It is unconscionable that any federal agency could store heavy battlefield- type ordnance in any public building - let alone one where a children's day care facility was located.
Why did the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the FBI store this dangerous ordnance there? How could such gross negligence and unprofessional behavior be tolerated? Worse still, why have so many of our elected representatives in Washington and members of the news media been so reluctant to expose the many aspects of prior knowledge and coverup of evidence regarding the Oklahoma City bombing?
As a person responsible for storage of dynamite and ANFO (ammonium nitrate and fuel oil) in a mining operation back in the mid-1980s, we stored explosives underground several hundred yards away from any mine portal or residence to assure public safety. It is just inconceivable that any government agency could be so unprofessional as to store heavy battlefield ordnance in an unprotected public building.
On an even more chilling note, how many other federal buildings used by the public might be storing heavy explosives? Why haven't our congressional leaders investigated this practice? Have the media investigated this? Isn't anybody concerned about public safety?
A.B. MAGNUS Chairman Americans for Responsible Media Arlington Heights, Ill.
The Oklahoma City Bombing - Glenn and Kathy Wilburn - Links