4um: Did anyone know if Goldi-Lox banned Itzlzha? She threatened to

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Did anyone know if Goldi-Lox banned Itzlzha? She threatened to
Source: LP
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 1, 2011
Author: .
Post Date: 2011-08-01 20:25:12 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 2211
Comments: 34

#14. To: Gatlin, Goldi-lox, (#13)
For the learning-disabled ... reading comprehension is always a major problem.
Regardless of the other stuff you post, you flaming disgusting remarks to yukon and others is over the top.
Either bozo him and shut the hell up, or I'm going to ban you. "Goldi-lox"
I need you to send out some guidelines to everyone for what anyone can say or do here...because we seem to have a protected class of agitators that start trouble, and are immune from discipline. And it seems that your rules of conduct are being breached regularly by some with no consequence, while others feel the sting and threat of banning...reminiscent of the purges at Free Republic.
How can free speech be here if certain parties can post equally disgusting comments, yet never be disciplined under the same rules.
And other of their flock can insert themselves unrequested and with a desire to provoke and aggravate with impunity? Is that what is involved in the word "liberty" in the title here? "Shut the hell up"? But ONLY to one party, and the other, with a bigger bozo list than ANYONE I'd wager, and his flock feel safe enough to smirk and snipe from behind your dress?
That is what is happening here...and you are helping it.

Therefore, I'll bozo him, along with his flock...but I ask you read his/their posts from here on out...see if they still makes attacks on me that, with me no longer able to see, they do with a feeling of smarmy self-satisfaction.
At least TRY to pretend to be fair.
Itzlzha posted on 2011-07-31 20:56:06 ET Reply Trace
Poster Comment:
Itz, if you lurk here (and I don't know if you do or not), you might as well accept the fact that yukon is a favored poster on LP and Goldi will shut the board down before she would ban him. She will ban others for giving him the same treatment he dishes out but he's "special" (for some reason and I wouldn't even venture a guess as to why).
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#6. To: James Deffenbach (#0)
Maybe she is schitzo and Yukko is her other personality. Goldi Locks - alias Sybil.

bush_is_a_moonie posted on 2011-08-02 1:20:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: bush_is_a_moonie, James Deffenbach (#6)
Maybe she is schitzo and Yukko is her other personality. Goldi Locks - alias Sybil.

I still think she is an alcoholic and is likely on anti-depressants to boot. In some ways I feel sorry for her even though she has made her own bed, and those of all her cougar attacks, and now she is likely very miserable on a day to day basis. However, she has done it to herself.

Original_Intent posted on 2011-08-02 1:40:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: Original_Intent (#8)
In some ways I feel sorry for her...

Yeah, it's really tuff for you apologists (you and Goldi and Alex Jones) who don't know what the secret cabal is, but you do know what it ain't-Jooish!
"Oh, yeah, the elite Freemasons, Satanists, Banksters, etc., who manipulate world events may have Jooish surnames and religiously defend Zionism, but that is incidental. And (despite the absence of any proof-HD) their first loyalty is to some shadowy Illuminati group and Jooish/Zionist/Likud-ish goals are secondary to that, not vice versa. I know this because some of my relatives are Jooish and (I'm pretty sure that) they aren't part of the conspiracy...."__Original Intent

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2011-08-02 7:32:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 11.
#12. To: all (#11)
Just found this post on LP--the defender of the "official truth" in all circumstances at all times (Gatlin) posted it.
#18. To: beyond the sea (#13)

Listen up, insignificant one.
WTP has been banned, libertub and calgone have voluntarily purged themselves, while Izzy is on his way out.
This now leaves only Bill D Berger to cast a shadow for you to hang out in … therefore, all you can do for the moment is to feed off his posts.
Mark your time … and enjoy, while you are still here.
Gatlin posted on 2011-08-01 9:26:54 ET Reply Trace
From the thread: How Hollywood Programs Us To Ignore The ‘Men Behind The Curtain’

James Deffenbach posted on 2011-08-02 09:56:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#20. To: HOUNDDAWG, christine, wudidiz, all (#11)
In some ways I feel sorry for her...
Yeah, it's really tuff for you apologists (you and Goldi and Alex Jones) who don't know what the secret cabal is, but you do know what it ain't-Jooish!
"Oh, yeah, the elite Freemasons, Satanists, Banksters, etc., who manipulate world events may have Jooish surnames and religiously defend Zionism, but that is incidental. And (despite the absence of any proof-HD) their first loyalty is to some shadowy Illuminati group and Jooish/Zionist/Likud-ish goals are secondary to that, not vice versa. I know this because some of my relatives are Jooish and (I'm pretty sure that) they aren't part of the conspiracy...."__Original Intent

So now we can add liar to your other sterling qualities.
You are getting spinnier and spinnier in your crazy vendetta. Lacking any legitimate comments that you can twist to suit your unhinged fatuous fantasies you are reduced to making up false quotations that is, LIES to somehow try to justify your derangement.
And the facts are what the facts are. I do not, and never have defended or tried to obfuscate criminal actions by ANYONE and my posting history is, and should be, quite clear on that point to anyone other than a complete idiot.
However, I am also quite clear in finding the attempts to fog issues by burying them in vague generalities such as "Jooz", Niggers, Slopes, Spics, Wops, Micks, Whites, etc., and asserting that the behavior of any given member of any given group is somehow representative of ALL members of that group is something I reject as the Logical Fallacy it is.

Guilt by Association

Alias:

Bad Company Fallacy

The Company that You Keep Fallacy

Type: Red Herring

Example:

The al Qaeda Cheering Section

The most telling moment in last night's [State of the Union] speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year." In response, notes the New York Times, "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If Osama bin Laden watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too.

Source: James Taranto, "The al Qaeda Cheering Section", Best of the Web Today, 1/21/2004

Analysis

General Form

Target Link Bad Thing

The person or group being criticized

An idea that the Target shares with the Bad Thing

A person or group of which the argument's audience disapproves

Specific Forms

Person P accepts idea I.

Therefore, I must be wrong.

Group G accepts idea I.
Therefore, I must be wrong.

Examples

Hitler was in favor of euthanasia.
Therefore, euthanasia is wrong.

The Nazis favored eugenics.
Therefore, eugenics is wrong.

Counter-Examples

Hitler was a vegetarian.
Therefore, vegetarianism is wrong.

The Nazis were conservationists.
Therefore, conservationism is wrong.

Exposition:

Guilt by Association is the attempt to discredit an idea based upon disfavored people or groups associated with it. This is the reverse of an Appeal to Misleading Authority, and might be justly called "Appeal to Anti-Authority". An argument to authority argues in favor of an idea based upon associating an authority figure with the idea, whereas Guilt by Association argues against an idea based upon associating it with disreputable people or groups.

Source: Guilt by Association

Original_Intent posted on 2011-08-02 12:58:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um

Guilt by Association

Example:

Exposition: