Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Did anyone know if Goldi-Lox banned Itzlzha? She threatened to
Source: LP
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 1, 2011
Author: .
Post Date: 2011-08-01 20:25:12 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 2198
Comments: 34

#14. To: Gatlin, Goldi-lox, (#13)

For the learning-disabled ... reading comprehension is always a major problem.

Regardless of the other stuff you post, you flaming disgusting remarks to yukon and others is over the top.

Either bozo him and shut the hell up, or I'm going to ban you. "Goldi-lox"

I need you to send out some guidelines to everyone for what anyone can say or do here...because we seem to have a protected class of agitators that start trouble, and are immune from discipline. And it seems that your rules of conduct are being breached regularly by some with no consequence, while others feel the sting and threat of banning...reminiscent of the purges at Free Republic.

How can free speech be here if certain parties can post equally disgusting comments, yet never be disciplined under the same rules.

And other of their flock can insert themselves unrequested and with a desire to provoke and aggravate with impunity? Is that what is involved in the word "liberty" in the title here? "Shut the hell up"? But ONLY to one party, and the other, with a bigger bozo list than ANYONE I'd wager, and his flock feel safe enough to smirk and snipe from behind your dress?

That is what is happening here...and you are helping it.

Therefore, I'll bozo him, along with his flock...but I ask you read his/their posts from here on out...see if they still makes attacks on me that, with me no longer able to see, they do with a feeling of smarmy self-satisfaction.

At least TRY to pretend to be fair.

Itzlzha posted on 2011-07-31 20:56:06 ET Reply Trace


Poster Comment:

Itz, if you lurk here (and I don't know if you do or not), you might as well accept the fact that yukon is a favored poster on LP and Goldi will shut the board down before she would ban him. She will ban others for giving him the same treatment he dishes out but he's "special" (for some reason and I wouldn't even venture a guess as to why).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#3. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-08-01   20:48:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Eric Stratton (#3)

I didn't get banned but stopped posting there after she posted her ridiculous diatribe about banning Ron Paul supporters. I thought it was a bit over the top to threaten to ban people from a POLITICAL DISCUSSION BOARD for posting articles about politics.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-08-01   20:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: James Deffenbach (#4) (Edited)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-08-01   21:12:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Eric Stratton, james deffenbach, wudidiz (#5)

i quit the site after she banned ron paul posts too, i typed a short screed condemning goldi & invited all the readers here to 4um, LoL. The thread was deleted & i was banned afterwards. it was funny. ;-) christine posted it here at the time, circa 2007?

Artisan  posted on  2011-08-02   10:24:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Artisan (#14)

Yeah, Goldi really, really didn't want all that "spam" (news articles) about Ron Paul and his campaign. But since he was the only actual American running she should have been happy that some of his supporters posted on her site.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-08-02   10:35:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: James Deffenbach (#16)

Yeah, Goldi really, really didn't want all that "spam" (news articles) about Ron Paul and his campaign. But since he was the only actual American running she should have been happy that some of his supporters posted on her site.

She did not like him for the same reason that the other Zionazis did not like him. He is a noninterventionist and opposes foreign aid (thus threatening Israel's Welfare Check). As well he was insufficiently obeisant to Israel. He actually put America's interests and well being ahead of Israel. Can you imagine the nervvvvve of that?

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-08-02   21:28:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Original_Intent (#29)

He is a noninterventionist and opposes foreign aid

As I am (noninterventionist) and as I do (oppose foreign aid). For the life of me I have never been able to find any authorization for either in the Constitution. To say that you are against foreign aid does not automatically mean you hate people in other countries. I certainly don't and I have never heard Ron say anything that indicated to me that he did either. As to the issue of foreign aid, I think individual Americans have the right to give their money to any charity they deem worthy, even to a foreign government so long as we are not at war with said government. Having said that, Congress has no right to take money from Americans and give to the rulers of foreign countries. They need to learn the lesson Horatio Bunce taught Davy Crockett all those years ago, Not Yours To Give.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-08-03   1:27:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

        There are no replies to Comment # 31.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest