4um: anonymous list of OWS demands! Now this is something to get behind!!!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Activism
See other Activism Articles
Title: anonymous list of OWS demands! Now this is something to get behind!!!
Source: Anonymous
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 30, 2011
Author: Anonymous
Post Date: 2011-10-30 01:36:26 by titorite
Keywords: Anonymous, Occupy, protest
Views: 1032
Comments: 46

UNITED MISSION STATEMENT (disseminate at will)

Expect us. You brushed us aside and ignored us. Now look, your sites get hacked, your criminal activities (such as “Fast and Furious”) exposed, banks are losing customers en masse, and now a worldwide uprising has been created and we won’t stop until your parasitic, destructive system is destroyed and all its criminals behind bars and, if applicable, impeached.

Initial Demands:
-Keep corporations out of politics/no more lobbying (which is essentially a bribe)/Firewall between Corporations and State
-Reversal of Citizens United ruling (Classifies Corporations as “The People” when convenient; allows them to “contribute” unlimited funds to politicians)
-Hold Corporations accountable for their numerous (and often horrific) crimes like you would a regular citizen, here and abroad if they are an American company. (If you still classify them as people, then not only do the high ranking employees face criminal charges, but the corporation itself must be “jailed”, operations shut down, computers and files locked away for duration of sentence. (Haliburton, Nike, Monsanto…the list is long)
-Criminal enterprises disbanded and high level members prosecuted for racketeering, fraud, conspiracy, and treason (such as Wall Street, CEOs looting pension funds, the unconstitutional and not at all Federal Reserve***, Goldman Sachs {Obama’s leading donor}, etc.) There are many beltway attorneys willing to prosecute if protected. Spitzer was trying, then got “honey trapped”
-THE QUICKEST GOAL TO ACHIEVE: Clear the Supreme Court’s schedule and have them rule on the legality of the IMF hub Federal Reserve while using military to protect them and their families while also monitoring these public servant’s bank accounts
-No more unions for government employees
-Eliminate all Tax Loopholes
-A law making one ineligible for Public Office if worked (or immediate family worked) on Board for multi-national Corporation
-Locate and eliminate tax havens for tax evaders, the greediest of the greedy
-End the Patriot Act
-End the Wars (including Drug War)
-Impeach and prosecute the complicit politicians and bankers (including Obama, and tried for war crimes those who came before)
-Expose Economic Hitman and arrest them and their bosses
-Expose and Outlaw FBI/CIA created terrorism internationally and domestically
-More checks and balances for cops and stiffer penalties for egregious abuses such as loss of pension and jail time (and they must pass a constitutional test before getting job)
-Allow/Remove restrictions for much more independent media across the nation (ala Italy)

Please spread around at least some of these to as many people as possible. Make Youtube videos. Make your own fliers. Add your own points if it doesn’t drift too far; that will merely cause dissent among us which is what they want. Remember, ixnay on taxes. Talk of taxes WILL DOOM the movement!!! Whether or not you agree on taxing the 1% more doesn’t matter because the .01% will find a way to steal that money too.
Many mid-level Government employees don’t want to see the country burn, nor do most of the military. So get them on board, they are the 99.99% too. Otherwise, we will either bring the whole system crashing down, starting anew community by community, or the current way will turn us all into serfs until humanity is more than decimated.
We won’t stop. Expect us.

***Each of the U.S. Federal Reserve Banks can be dissolved today by an act of Congress or “forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.” How the American people can end the unconstitutional control of their money using the Federal Reserve interest bearing counterfeit Note is codified in the United States Code, TITLE 12 CHAPTER 3 SUBCHAPTER IX § 341: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscod ... 2_00000341——000-.html General enumeration of powers. What laws have the Federal Reserve violated that would warrant their immediate forfeiture? Counterfeiting, money laundering, trafficking of counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes, securities fraud, fraud, insider trading, extortion, and embezzlement.
Only the Congress of the U.S., which comprises of the Senate and the House of Representatives has the power to coin and issue the U.S. money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation. Therefore the Federal Reserve is null and void.
http://anoncentral.tumblr.com/post/1196 ... sed-around
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#1. To: titorite (#0)
-Locate and eliminate tax havens for tax evaders

In all likelihood whatever is evaded in taxes becomes capital which is invested in wealth-building enterprises.
Taxes, on the other hand just end up in an ever expanding and intrusive bureaucracy, not to mention the Jew-fabricated war on terror and wars to protect Israel's security, instigated by US-Israeli duals who have taken control of national politics by arranging funding, manpower and media coverage for congressional candidates. So whoever can find a way to minimize non-specific taxes, more power to him, he and the rest of us will be far better off.

Tatarewicz posted on 2011-10-30 2:59:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#1)
In all likelihood whatever is evaded in taxes becomes capital which is invested in wealth-building enterprises.

Wut?

No never mind
I shall just say this: The Rockefellers, The Rothschilds, The Morgans, The elites , they need to chip in and pay what they owe like the rest of us or else they need to GTFO.

titorite posted on 2011-10-30 3:08:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: titorite (#2)
Rockefellers, The Rothschilds, The Morgans, The elites , they need to chip in and pay what they owe like the rest of us

Economy observer Eric Fry of the Daily Reckoning illustrates where big chunks of taxes are going. Just because dumb taxpayers contribute to this kind of nonsense doesn't mean Rockerfeller, etc., should "chip in."
Tuesday’s Congressional Hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs helps to illustrate the extent of the government’s intrusiveness.
The witnesses in attendance included a bevy of federal officials with ominous, absurdly long titles like Homeland Security Undersecretary for Science and Technology, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary for Health Affairs, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Assistant Director, Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate and Senior Director for Biological Defense Policy.
During the repartee, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response extolled the government’s post-9/11 success in making America safer against bio-warfare:
“Critical to the success of the whole Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasure Enterprise — or the PHEMCE, as it’s called — is an integrated approach with a formal government structure, and he should know that this includes all the components of HHS plus DHS, VA, DOD, USDA. So it’s truly an interagency effort — and that all parts now of HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH, BARDA work together with companies from the outset of the contract rather than at the end of the pipeline... Yet as we all know from the Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism Research Center report card, while we’ve made important progress...our preparedness is not yet sufficient...Without continued support and funding for our public health and medical systems, the infrastructure will degrade...”
Maybe all these bureaus, agencies and directorates are as essential as their Undersecretaries, Assistant Secretaries and Senior Directors would have us believe. Maybe not.
But two things we know for certain: all this government-sponsored hyperactivity is very expensive and very intrusive. It costs a lot of money to stick one’s bureaucratic nose into every citizen’s business.
After Sept. 11, America’s intelligence, surveillance and counter- terrorism agencies basically got a blank check to fund their efforts. The CIA got a billion dollars right away. So did the National Security Agency (NSA). “What we found in the years immediately after Sept. 11 was that the existing agencies grew enormously,” observes Dana Priest, a reporter for The Washington Post. “They doubled in size, many of them, and new organizations were created as well, big ones.”
In 2002, for example, there were 34 new federal organizations created to work at the top-secret level. In 2003, government created 39 more; in 2004, 30 more; in 2005, another 35; and more each year since. “Every year [since 9/11],” Priest goes on, “more than two dozen, sometimes three dozen, entirely new federal organizations dedicated to counterterrorism [were] being created.”
Do we really need all these agencies? Will any of us really notice or care if we lose a few government acronyms along the way?
By funding this proliferation of intrusive government agencies — all in the name of national security — we taxpayers are paying to be groped by strangers, metaphorically speaking. Maybe we could do with a little less groping. And certainly, we could do with a lot less “protecting” and “rescuing.”
Less is more, as the saying goes.
Thus, the one solution to the euro crisis — and also to the economic malaise here at home — is the one solution that no one seems to be considering: Benign neglect.
Doing nothing at all may be the very best thing to do, as Jim Grant suggests in a recent issue of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer. “Constructive inaction” is the term Grant uses to describe the government’s response — or rather, non-response — to the economic contraction of 1920.
“90 years ago,” Grant explains, “in the teeth of a slump much deeper than our Great Recession, the government did what today would be unimaginable.”
It did nothing.
“The US government — the Wilson administration through March 1921, the Harding administration thereafter — met the emergency mainly by getting out of its way,” Grant relates. “To most of the policymakers of the day, it was, indeed no ‘emergency,’ but essays of the business cycle, unpleasant but inevitable.”
Importantly, the government of 1920-21 did not stand aside because it had no idea what to do; it stood aside because it had some idea what not to do. The administrations of Wilson and Harding stood aside because they trusted market forces to resolve the crisis more effectively that the government could.
“Market forces didn’t fail in 1920-21,” says Grant. “They were virtually the only forces in play... The Federal Reserve in 1919 was celebrating its fifth birthday, while the welfare state of finance — too big to fail, TARP, TALF, etc. — was not only unborn but also unimagined.”
Anticipating the deep recession of 1920-21, the Ben Bernanke of his day, Benjamin Strong, governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, had this to say in 1919:
[“There will be] a considerable degree of unemployment, but not for very long, and... after a year or two of discomfort, embarrassment, some losses, some disorders caused by unemployment, we will emerge with an almost invincible banking position, prices more nearly at competitive levels with other nations, and be able to exercise a wide and important influence in restoring the world to a normal and livable condition.”
Therefore, in anticipation of both an imminent deep recession and also at a rapid, vibrant recovery that would restore the world to a normal and livable condition, Strong proposed neither bailout plans nor “stimulus measures” to alter the economy’s natural course.
He simply watched. And as he watched, he saw his predictions fulfilled. The economy did contract, fiercely so. But shortly thereafter, the economy launched a powerful recovery. The whole thing lasted less than two years.
“The point cannot be overstated that the slump did end,” Grant points out, “and that the post-1921 labor market mounted a powerful recovery and that the incumbent Republicans remained in power until Herbert Hoover decided to meet the Great Depression, not through inaction but through an aggressive intervention.”
But constructive inaction is not even a topic of discussion among the G-20. Today’s discussion is all about destructive action. In the name of “stabilizing the system,” the G-20 wishes to amass hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into a kind of economic funeral pyre.
“The supposed lessons of the Great Depression, as interpreted by the former Princeton economics professor who now directs the nation’s destiny at the helm of the Federal Reserve Board, constitute the guiding light for today’s policymakers,” Grant explains. “Intervene early and often... print money, run up the federal debt, slash interest rates, extend jobless benefits and soften the sting of foreclosure...”
Accordingly, the leaders of the EU and IMF are planning to “save the system” by sending money to governments that overspent foolishly and banks that invested foolishly. Why bother saving that system?
The system that deserves saving is not the one that rewards incompetence and reckless risk-taking. The system that deserves saving is the one that rewards prudence. That’s the very same system that permits bankrupt investments to go bankrupt...that separates fools from their money.
The system that deserves saving is not the one that tries to slap green paint on every piece of dead wood and call it “healthy.” The system worth saving is the one that respects the power of market forces — that allows the dead wood to rot and decompose right where it sits, so that it may fertilize the next generation of productive enterprise.
“The bailout funds [in Europe] — no matter how large they grow — will merely slow the march toward inevitability,” we observed several weeks ago. “The destination is certain; the timetable is variable.”
Greece will default...eventually. Why not let it happen? And if the euro fails, the euro fails. Why not let that happen too?
The leading policymakers of the European Union would like to halt the crisis in its tracks. Not gonna happen. These guys and gals should probably stop practicing their speeches into a mirror. They are forgetting that the images before them are flip-flopped. Left is actually right. Right is actually left. Rescue plans are actually failure plans. Failure is actually the first part of any enduring rescue.
by150w.bay150.mail.live.c...e0-b50c-00237de4a312&fv=1

Tatarewicz posted on 2011-10-30 3:25:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#4. To: Tatarewicz (#3) (Edited)
Just because dumb taxpayers contribute to this kind of nonsense doesn't mean Rockerfeller, etc., should "chip in."

Are you high?
What are you saying, if you earn your first trillion you shouldn't have to pay taxes like us normal peons?
Fuck that.
I ain't saying tax em into the poor house but damnit when these limey scum get tax refunds it is time to rearrange government and yes it is MORE THAN TIME to
-Locate and eliminate tax havens for tax evaders

By the way, if you are a US citizen Tatarewicz, then you are one of those "Dumb Taxpayers" that contribute to the nonsense.
If you're gonna pay for it and I'm gonna pay for it just Why on gods green earth by all that you hold holy, should Mr Rockefeller be exempted?

titorite posted on 2011-10-30 3:33:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: titorite (#4)
You seem to be presupposing we need government to determine how we drive cars, foods we eat, treatments for illness, etc., paid for from taxes going into a general revenue fund. I'm saying motorists, as part of an association should decide the rules of the road, roadways that need to be built and how these are to be financed. Likewise leave it to intelligent consumers to determine what foods they buy and from whom. With the internet consumers can readily inform themselves about various choices, take analytical chemistry courses to inform themselves and others of food contaminants.

Tatarewicz posted on 2011-10-30 10:39:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 10.
#13. To: Tatarewicz (#10)
I'm saying motorists, as part of an association should decide the rules of the road, roadways that need to be built and how these are to be financed. Likewise leave it to intelligent consumers to determine what foods they buy and from whom. With the internet consumers can readily inform themselves about various choices, take analytical chemistry courses to inform themselves and others of food contaminants.

hmmmmm..
Ambitious words. I myself believe in incrmentalism towards such ends. In the meantime I see the list of demands as a step in that direction... will the anonymous get everything they are asking for? proly not. But are they asking for free college , free lunches , and free rides? no... theirs asking for responsible respectable government..
To get to voluntary cooperation you gotta go become respectful and responsible.
It's a process.

titorite posted on 2011-10-30 11:15:54 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um