Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Russia's largest anti-government protests aimed at Vladimir Putin and unfair election
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=1784169
Published: Dec 11, 2011
Author: Gobby Wang
Post Date: 2011-12-11 02:04:26 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 86
Comments: 4

Agence France-Presse () Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin speaks at a meeting of the Popular Front in Moscow, Russia, Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011. (Agence France-Presse) According to AP's report, mostly tens of thousands of people held the largest anti-government protests that post-Soviet Russia has ever seen to criticize electoral fraud and demand an end to Vladimir Putin's rule. Police showed surprising restraint and state-controlled TV gave the nationwide demonstrations unexpected airtime, but there is no indication the opposition is strong enough to push for real change from the prime minister or his ruling party.

Still, the prime minister seems to be in a weaker position than he was a week ago, before Russians voted in parliamentary elections. His United Party lost a substantial share of its seats, although it retains a majority.

The independent Russian election-observer group Golos said Saturday that "it achieved the majority mandate by falsification," international observers reported widespread irregularities, and the outpouring of Russians publicly denouncing him throughout the country undermines Putin's carefully nurtured image of a strong and beloved leader.

Putin "has stopped being the national leader — in the eyes of his team, the ruling political class and society," analyst Alexei Malachenko of the Moscow Carnegie Center wrote on his blog.

Putin, who was the president of Russia in 2000-2008 before stepping aside because of term limits, will seek a new term in the Kremlin in the March presidential elections. The protests have tarnished his campaign, but there is not yet any obvious strong challenger.

A statement released late Saturday by Putin's press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, acknowledged the day's protests by people "displeased" with the elections but noted demonstrations in support of the elections in recent days.

"We respect the point of view of the protestors, we are hearing what is being said, and we will continue to listen to them," the statement said. "The citizens of Russia have a right to express their point of view, in protest and in support, and those rights will continue to be secured as long as all sides do so in a lawful and peaceful manner."

The most dramatic of Saturday's protests saw a vast crowd jam an expansive Moscow square and adjacent streets, packed so tight that some demonstrators stood on others' toes. Although police estimated the crowd at 30,000, aerial photographs suggested far more, and protest organizers made claims ranging from 40,000 to 100,000 or more.

Elsewhere in Russia, some 7,000 protesters assembled in St. Petersburg, and demonstrations ranging from a few hundred people to a thousand took place in more than 60 other cities. Police reported only about 100 arrests nationwide, a notably low number for a force that characteristically quick and harsh action against opposition gatherings.

The police restraint was one of several signs that conditions may be easing for the beleaguered opposition, at least in the short term. Although city authorities generally refuse opposition forces permission to rally or limit the gatherings to small attendance, most the protests Saturday were sanctioned. In a surprise move, Moscow gave permission for up to 30,000 people to rally and police took no action when the crowd appeared to far exceed that. Just as striking, police allowed a separate unauthorized protest to take place in Revolution Square.

Yet the concessions may be only a way of buying time in hope the protests will wither away. The opposition says the next large Moscow protest will be on Dec. 24. What it will do in the interim to keep morale high is unclear. In addition, the social media that nourished Saturday's protests may be coming under pressure. A top official of the Russian Facebook analog Vkontakte said this week his company has been pressured by the Federal Security Service to block opposition supporters from posting. On Friday, he was summoned by the service for questioning.

Meanwhile, though United Russia may be shaken by the last week's events, it still can count on a large cadre of supporters. The head of its youth wing, Timur Prokopenko, was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying he had nearly 170,000 activists "who are ready at moment to go to rallies" in support of the government.

"United Russia made a miracle, prompting all of us to unite against it," nationalist leader Konstantin Krylov told the rally.

Thousands of protesters also were allowed to march from a gathering place near the Kremlin across downtown to a square where the main rally was held. Police were out in force, blocking all side lanes to prevent the demonstrators from approaching government buildings.

"Russia will be free!" ''Russia without Putin!" ''United Russia is a Party of Crooks and Thieves!" protesters chanted.

"We will fight to the end, to the cancellation of this shameful, false election," said Grigory Yavlinsky, leader of the liberal Yabloko party that failed to make it to parliament in last Sunday's vote. "We are launching a campaign to drive Putin from power."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Could be a clue as to protests in Russia in this post by HunAvar in Pravda's Main Forum:

engforum.pravda.ru/index....is-behind-it-a-must-read/

The Khazar Tribe/Cabal has mounted a coordinated attack on Russia, that's obvious. I guess, they want the power back they lost, when communism failed. They transferred enormous amount of the Russian/Soviet wealth for themselves (ALL the Russian oligarchs are Jews), but Putin and Co managed to grasp the political power, and jail some of them, and make the biggest and the worst oligarchs to flee Russia. Unfortunately, they took a lot of their stolen Russian loot with them.

See, they miscalculated; during Stalin 50% of the Soviet communist party were Jews. But by he time of Gorbachov their political power waned; partly because a lot of them were gotten rid of via moving to Israel (and the USA). The ones left in Russia had a lot of political power (the high echelon Jews didn't emigrate) and were literally craving for big, massive wealth, which was just not really possible in the SU, to anywhere near to the extent they wanted it. So they figured if they get rid of communism, they can get truly very-very rich, like their brethren in the West.

They were correct in the ability of amassing massive wealth in the absence of communism and the economic breakdown they created; the richest men (oligarchs) in Russia by the end of the Yeltsyn era were all Jews without exception. However, Putin screwed them when he came to power. He was the proverbial trojan horse.The oligarchs were thrown into jail, and the rest of them had to flee to avoid jail. The Russian populace didn't care one bit about them, it was a commonplace knowledge - and openly talked about - in Russia that they were all thieving Jews.

So now it is not only payback time against Putin, but an attempt of the Khazars of getting back to power as well. I predict, they'll fail, Putin is Russian and a patriot, but thankfully without imperial notions; perhaps he learned, that empires are very-very costly, and generally quite unstable in the long run.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2011-12-11   3:05:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

Russia's largest anti-government protests aimed at Vladimir Putin and unfair election - CIA and Mossad vow to get Putin removed, Hitlery laughs

There, fixed it.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-11   3:08:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tatarewicz (#1)

The Khazar Tribe/Cabal Rothschilds has have mounted a coordinated attack on Russia, that's obvious. I guess, they want the power back they lost, when communism failed. They transferred enormous amount of the Russian/Soviet wealth for themselves (ALL the Russian oligarchs are Jews), but Putin and Co managed to grasp the political power, and jail some of them, and make the biggest and the worst oligarchs to flee Russia.

I made the amendments because all of the Jewish Oligarchs who tried to take over all of Russia's major money producing industries are Rothschild toadies. The Rothschilds are pissed at Putin because he conducted surgical strikes removing their rot. They desperately want to regain control of Russia as it has now become the one major counterbalance to their owngoing plot to "take the world private".

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-12-11   3:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Original_Intent (#3)

I made the amendments because all of the Jewish Oligarchs who tried to take over all of Russia's major money producing industries are Rothschild toadies

These toadies initially needed loans from the London banker to buy up lucrative state industries.

BTW, things were so loose during Khordo's early days with the oil company that even lower level staff were "siphoning" money out of the country. I got a request to use my bank account for a $20-million deposit, to be split later with the sender. I suspect this was "legit," not a Nigerian scam. Also, HunAvar's synopsis is the best overview that I've come across.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2011-12-11   7:47:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest