Propagandist Borger ends the interview with an outrageous insinuation and lie: "Some of this stuff was very incendiary, you know... saying that in 1993 the Israelis were responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center".
The newsletters, politically incorrect as they might have been, NEVER made such a claim.
The corporate media will stop at nothing to discredit Ron Paul, but fortunately it's NOT working.
Actually he did. In his April 1993 newsletter he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?). Considering that Ron Paul has been very cautious about accusing the Arabs of any wrongdoing, throwing in an accusation about Israel so casually is significant.
Actually he did. In his April 1993 newsletter he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?). Considering that Ron Paul has been very cautious about accusing the Arabs of any wrongdoing, throwing in an accusation about Israel so casually is significant.
1. Actually no he didn't.
2. Accusing Israel casually has no significant repercussions. What is Israel gonna do in retaliation? Insist upon being sent more money bombs and soldiers?
Or how about the truck bomb sporting a mural of a plane diving into NYC buildings and blowing up, that just happened to be driven to its location by Mossad agents? Or the van driven by Mossad agents that was filled with tons of explosives?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
No wonder shoonra is so confused. I'd be confused too, if I had to read all those upside down lines, up and down, crossways, every which way ... and then convince myself they all meant something.
Shoonra comes to visit us on 4um because we speak our minds and he can't.
Damn, I love how easy it is to identify these moles.
“With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”
he reported this as the theory of "a Jewish friend" (does he really have any?)
Disregarding the rest of the nonsense, Dr. Paul's had a long association with Jews. Rothbard, Mises, Burt Blumert, to name a few. Last I heard, Bruce Fein is one of his senior advisors.
Silly me. They're the wrong kind of Jews, aren't they? Maybe not Fein.
Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner. Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner. My Man Godfrey (1936 2011)
The brain holds on to false facts, even after they have been retracted
By Valerie Ross | July 18, 2011
After people realize the facts have been fudged, they do their best to set the record straight: judges tell juries to forget misleading testimony; newspapers publish errata. But even explicit warnings to ignore misinformation cannot erase the damage done, according to a new study from the University of Western Australia.
[sic] what psychologists call the continued influence of misinformation—that people tend to have a hard time ignoring what they first heard, even if they know it is wrong [sic]
“even if you understand, remember and believe the retractions, this misinformation will still affect your inferences,” says Western Australia psychologist Ullrich Ecker, an author of the study.
Ron Paul is a subject of the Daily Paul website. That it bears his name does not mean he is the owner and author of it or officially affiliated with its content in any way. Some writings there might be considered controversial by whoever and some writings might not be correct. If he gets money contributed to him from the site and his supporters there, that does not mean he personally endorses their every view or everything the site endorses.
Your link, Shoonra, is not evidence of any racism on Ron Paul's part or anything at all authored by him. It is evidence of Anti-Reagan interests, Anti- Arab/Muslim/Palestine interests, Cultural Marxist-interests of the PC Thought Police, and falsified/misleading/libelous/slanderous charges made by Anti-Ron Paul interests. This page of alleged "evidence" there never mentions Ron Paul's name anywhere, even in the heading that simply says, "Survival Report". For all we know, it could have been authored by you, Shoonra:
The links for mrdestructo.com go to a site that says: The official blog of notorious former African dictator Mobutu Sese Seko
And that's what you consider a credible source, Shoonra? This statement suggestively attributed to Ron Paul is evidence of a deliberate attempt by an imposter to set him up for defamation of character and harrassment assaults by the McMedia goonsquads to sabotage his political leadership:
"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day. Listen to a black radio talk show in any major city. The racial hatred makes a KKK rally look tame."
TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL HOLIDAY.
Number: House Vote #624 in 1979 [data from Professor Keith Poole]
Date: Dec 5, 1979
Result: Passed
Related Bill: H.R. 5461 [96th]: A bill to designate the birthday of Martin Luther King, Junior, a legal public...
Vote Overview
Aye: 291 (68%) 220 [Democrats] 71 [Republicans]
Nay: 106 (25%) 33 [Democrats] 73 [Republicans]
Not Voting: 32 (7%) 17 [Democrats] 15 [Republicans]
Texas Aye TX-22 Paul, Ronald [R]
We could discuss all of the Republicans and all of the Democrats in the House and the Senate who didn't vote for any Martin Luther King Day legislation and why they didn't but Ron Paul wasn't one of them. What's the ludicrous reason, though, why Shoonra & Company are apparently far more concerned about Ron Paul's past than Obama's much murkier past, including his terrorist affiliations with and contributions from the Weather Underground?
Admit it, Shoonra. This wrongful campaign to misrepresent Ron Paul as a racist is because your corner fears that he is the most electable GOP candidate and could win the Presidency by a huge margin. What you want to see is any of the least electable GOP candidates nominated so that inegligible Obama continues his usurpation of our Executive Branch -- yes or no?
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Admit it, Shoonra. This wrongful campaign to misrepresent Ron Paul as a racist is because your corner fears that he is the most electable GOP candidate and could win the Presidency by a huge margin.
Excellent commentary and good research work. Shoonra and his ilk/handlers want another buttwheat, if not buttwheat himself, because he and those like him are so easily handled, whereas Paul is still thinking for himself.
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”
The content of that video, particularly given Duhmerikans' ignorance, is angering.
It is concrete, tangible evidence that Israel was involved in the 9/11 attacks, yet we attack Iraq and Afghanistan who both had nothing to do with it, and war drums beat loudly for a war against Iran who ALSO had nothing to do with it.
If our "leaders" weren't bought and paid for, we'd address the correct perp as the matter warrents.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
Thanks, Phant. Found this info on the CNN interviewer at abovetopsecret.com but haven't researched it further yet:
Gloria Borger is married to LANCE MORGAN. Lance is the chief communications and crisis strategist of POWELL TATE.Powell Tate is a D.C. firm that represents every part of the very same MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX that Ron Paul wants to reduce. SURPRISE SURPRISE!
This is a total conflict of interest. Her husband's firm includes overseeing a coalition to support congressional funding to parts of the U.S. Military.
Edited to correct 1st link.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thanks for the additional information. Good that you search for more information to support or deny that which we read/see/hear. It is something I do constantly, as I long ago realized our news sources are worse than that which was the norm in Russia during the cold war.
Admit it, Shoonra. This wrongful campaign to misrepresent Ron Paul as a racist is because your corner fears that he is the most electable GOP candidate and could win the Presidency by a huge margin.
Excellent commentary and good research work. Shoonra and his ilk/handlers want another buttwheat, if not buttwheat himself, because he and those like him are so easily handled, whereas Paul is still thinking for himself.
No wars for Israel, and RP is the *only* candidate to offer that choice. It's wonderful how many Independents and non Bolshevik Ds agree and are on the non interventionist band wagon.
