Title: The American People WAKE UP after the Library of Congress proves Obama NOT to be a US Citizen. Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Feb 2, 2012 Author:. Post Date:2012-02-02 14:09:20 by James Deffenbach Keywords:None Views:6732 Comments:57
Why don't we have answers to any of these questions? If you are going to post a rebuttal - answer the question - WHY?? And don't give me the line that I have no right to see these documents. As a member of this representative republic, I have the right and the responsibility to ask these questions. And SO DO YOU!
The very talented Singer/Songwriter/Author Chris Miller was kind enough to allow us to do this countrified version of his most excellent tribute to all you "BIRTHERS" out there!
Its's simple really...all I want to know is why all the secrecy for such a "TRANSPARENT" President? I had to undergo intense background investigations, polygraphs, etc...to get my job...shouldn't the POTUS have to do the same?
Its's simple really...all I want to know is why all the secrecy for such a "TRANSPARENT" President? I had to undergo intense background investigations, polygraphs, etc...to get my job...shouldn't the POTUS have to do the same?
Great videos. And a good point about how most of us have to show documents to do just about anything. But apparently Kenyans don't have to do all that.
Yeah, and America loses. I am not surprised that the so-called "judge" ruled the way he did. I would have been surprised if he had ruled in accordance with the law and the facts both of which are against your side.
Both the law and the facts are on Obama's side. Taitz went up with no solid evidence and her ditzy legalistic tea leaf reading, which went against the entire history of American legal decisions on this matter.
Wrong lawyer boy! The law (Constitution) is NOT on the side of the Kenyan. Nor would it be on the side of any other foreigner who had usurped the role of president. And the facts are not on his side either, not when you consider all the evidence available, including, but not limited to, his heffalump's admission, his grandmother's admission and several other facts which have been pointed out to you over and over.
The Library of Congress did not report anything against Obama's eligibility, on the contrary, its Congressional Reference Service cites a wealth of legal support for his natural-born citizenship.
More than a dozen courts have rejected birther claims, not one has upheld the birthers.
Yeah, just keep on lying for your Kenyan. You are not fooling anyone on this site, or at least not anyone with more than two adequately functioning brain cells.
Jameson is not much better, but they may just be lost and uninformed. I have not pegged them a complete shill yet.
Thanks for the ping.......not
Most consider it poor etiquette at best, or cowardly and pathetic at worst to not ping another poster when bad-mouthing them......
You can decide whether you made a simple mistake, or if you're just a bitch. I've already made up my mind.
I f you had bothered to ask, I would have happily shared with you my position..... I'm really not much of an Obama supporter..... I'm not a republican and I'm not a democrat.
I'm just a regular American who wants what is best for ALL Americans. Even those whom many others seem to hate.
My position on the ridiculous berfer argument is quite simple......
Obama was elected president of the United States of America and he will remain president until the next president is elected.
There will be no impeachment, no removal from office, and no other actions.... It will not happen. Sorry.
Most of us here in our great country are working hard and doing all we can to improve our lives, and the general standard of living for everyone. Most of us don't hate and don't resent those who disagree with us.
The berfer position is a weak distraction from the business of making America great again.
Most consider it poor etiquette at best, or cowardly and pathetic at worst to not ping another poster when bad-mouthing them......
The protocol at another forum was to ping a person being mentioned as a matter of courtesy if they weren't already posting in the discussion or hadn't for some time. Otherwise, it was presumed that they were keeping up with the conversation.
#49. To: GreyLmist, intotheabyss, James Deffenbach, christine, ALL (#47)
The protocol at another forum was to ping a person being mentioned as a matter of courtesy if they weren't already posting in the discussion or hadn't for some time. Otherwise, it was presumed that they were keeping up with the conversation.
protocol from another forum? F you!
yeah, who gives a shit.
"Otherwise, it was presumed that they were keeping up with the conversation." Give me a f'ing break - what a lame excuse!
If you want to engage me - do so - I'll be glad to interact.
If you want to talk about me behind my back - without including me in the conversation - you're a coward and a bitch.
if you want to bad-mouth a poster then put them on "bozo" so you can avoid their rebuttal - you're a coward and a bitch.
"Otherwise, it was presumed that they were keeping up with the conversation." Give me a f'ing break - what a lame excuse!
If you want to engage me - do so - I'll be glad to interact.
If you want to talk about me behind my back - without including me in the conversation - you're a coward and a bitch.
if you want to bad-mouth a poster then put them on "bozo" so you can avoid their rebuttal - you're a coward and a bitch.
Go back to freeperville
That post was the third time I engaged you in this topic. The first time I pinged you. The other two attempts were posted directly to just you. And that's your idea of interacting gladly? -- lecturing me on the Rules of Engagement across the internet to address and appease you? The importance of this topic isn't about you. Thanks for the demonstration, though, on how easy it is to step on your toes even when not excluding you from the conversation or hurling animus baselessly as you do.
So, speaking of Exclusion Acts, do you wanna play Trivial Pursuit? -- since you apparently don't want to discuss the substantive issues?
Q: Who signed the Chinese Exclusion Act suspending Chinese immigration with a ban intended to last 10 years, which led to the Wong Kim Ark case?
A: Chester A. Arthur, illegitimate resident of the White House.