Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Pious PervertsSee other Pious Perverts ArticlesTitle: A $47 Hooker Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: Apr 17, 2012 Author: Internet Post Date: 2012-04-17 16:36:31 by Turtle Keywords: NoneViews: 817 Comments: 26 I found out only one SS agent rented a hooker, and wouldn't pay her $47. The agent, of course....was not white. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22. #17. To: Turtle, all (#0) (Edited) This is a photo of her. Would you do her for $47? LINK Armadillo posted on 2012-04-19 20:50:22 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #21. To: Armadillo (#17) If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. $800? Never. $47 is more like it in her case. Turtle posted on 2012-04-21 12:48:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #22. To: Turtle, farmfriend (#21) If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. I'm a sucker for women with pigtails. And she can leave her sunglasses on. Her eyes are not the organ I am interested in. ;) Armadillo posted on 2012-04-21 18:26:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 22. There are no replies to Comment # 22. End Trace Mode for Comment # 22. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Pious PervertsSee other Pious Perverts Articles
Title: A $47 Hooker Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: Apr 17, 2012 Author: Internet Post Date: 2012-04-17 16:36:31 by Turtle Keywords: NoneViews: 817 Comments: 26
I found out only one SS agent rented a hooker, and wouldn't pay her $47. The agent, of course....was not white.
The agent, of course....was not white.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
#17. To: Turtle, all (#0) (Edited) This is a photo of her. Would you do her for $47? LINK Armadillo posted on 2012-04-19 20:50:22 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #21. To: Armadillo (#17) If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. $800? Never. $47 is more like it in her case. Turtle posted on 2012-04-21 12:48:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #22. To: Turtle, farmfriend (#21) If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. I'm a sucker for women with pigtails. And she can leave her sunglasses on. Her eyes are not the organ I am interested in. ;) Armadillo posted on 2012-04-21 18:26:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 22. There are no replies to Comment # 22. End Trace Mode for Comment # 22. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
This is a photo of her. Would you do her for $47? LINK
LINK
Armadillo posted on 2012-04-19 20:50:22 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. $800? Never. $47 is more like it in her case.
$800? Never.
$47 is more like it in her case.
Turtle posted on 2012-04-21 12:48:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all. I'm a sucker for women with pigtails. And she can leave her sunglasses on. Her eyes are not the organ I am interested in. ;)
If she was to take her sunglasses off I don't think she'd be very attractive at all.
I'm a sucker for women with pigtails. And she can leave her sunglasses on. Her eyes are not the organ I am interested in. ;)
Armadillo posted on 2012-04-21 18:26:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There are no replies to Comment # 22.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
