Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: U.S. Presidental IQ Hoax
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 8, 2012
Author: Wikipedia
Post Date: 2012-05-08 12:59:41 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 358
Comments: 28

The U.S. Presidential IQ hoax was a mid-2001 e-mail and internet hoax that purported to provide a list of estimated IQs of the U.S. Presidents from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush.[1]

The hoaxThe hoax email showed Bill Clinton having the highest IQ (182) and George W. Bush the lowest (91). However, the numbers claimed in the email were fabricated, and the sociologists and institutions (e.g., the "Lovenstein Institute") quoted in the article do not exist (a "Lovenstein Institute" website displays the "report", but it was created after the report's release).[2] The techniques purportedly used to measure IQ of the presidents are not recognized means of measuring IQs. The hoax also contains other factual errors.[1] When the hoax was debunked, it appeared to be a personal attack on Bush because of its timing and its listing Bush's IQ as exactly half that of Clinton's.

Reports about the hoaxPerhaps because the perception of George W. Bush having low intelligence is common and had been cited by the media[3] as well as by politicians, including a spokesperson for Tony Blair,[4] the hoax report was widely taken to be true. The British newspaper The Guardian, for example, quoted the report in its diary section of July 19, 2001 and used it to belittle Bush, although the paper published a retraction two days after the Associated Press drew attention to the error.[5][6] Other mainstream media news outlets to fall for the hoax included Bild (Germany), Pravda (Russia), and the Southland Times (New Zealand) as well as a few small U.S. newspapers. The hoax came back to life in March 2007 in Spanish-language media when the Press Agency EFE distributed a piece referring to it. Dozens of media (primarily in their online versions) reproduced EFE's text. Among newspapers publishing the hoax were El País (Spain's leading newspaper),[7] ABC and La Vanguardia.

Origin of the hoaxAbout.com reports that linkydinky.com was the original source of the spoof.[8] Indeed, linkydinky's page on the hoax calls the report "our hoax".[9] A copy of the spoof in full can be found there.

IQ estimations by academicsIn 2001 political psychologist Aubrey Immelman made an IQ estimation of G. W. Bush based on the SAT Reasoning Test results of Bush (1206) and Al Gore, who achieved IQ scores of 133 and 134 in his school years: "It's tempting to employ Al Gore's IQ:SAT ratio of 134:1355 as a formula for estimating Bush's probable intelligence quotient — an exercise in fuzzy statistics that predicts a score of 119."[10]

A 2006 study analyzing presidential IQs by Dean Keith Simonton of U.C. Davis appeared in the journal Political Psychology. Simonton's study analyzed the results of varied and often subjective historical material using the tools of historiometry. It estimated IQs for all US presidents, and validated the headline of the hoax, which stated Bush's was the lowest of any president in the last 50 years, though it estimates his IQ considerably higher (by more than two standard deviations) than the 91 suggested in the hoax report. It rated G.W. Bush second to last since 1900, with an estimated IQ of 125 (the estimates ranged from 111 to 139). Bush's estimated IQ was only higher than those estimated for Grant (120), Monroe (124), and Harding (124). The same study estimated president Bill Clinton's IQ at 149, behind only those of Kennedy (151), Jefferson (154) and J. Quincy Adams (169).[11]

The methodology of Simonton's study was questioned by Thomas C. Reeves who refers to an actual IQ test by Kennedy with a score of 119.[12]


Poster Comment:

This is for those who fall for hoaxes and don't even know it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#2. To: Turtle (#0)

This is for those who fall for hoaxes and don't even know it.

Your point?

An attempt to damn all speculation and inference?

One thing we do know is that Jorge was not the sharpest tool in the shed - he was in fact an idiot - as is Obama. I suspect Jorge was the dumber of the two but neither one should ever be accused of being bright.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-08   14:06:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Original_Intent, turtle (#2)

U.S. Presidental IQ

"As democracy is perfected, the office of President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."---H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2012-05-08   15:08:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Lysander_Spooner (#5)

On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

lol.....Mencken was a man of great insight. : )

abraxas  posted on  2012-05-08   22:51:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: abraxas (#18)

Yup, and "the plain folks of the land" have gotten their men.

Morons who have become El Presidente:

Obummer

Dubnuts

I think stinkn Lincoln was a moron, likely disease ridden with syphilis and affected by Marfan's Syndrome, he was a sick, sick person.

A short list, perhaps you could add too it.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2012-05-09   11:04:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Lysander_Spooner (#20)

A short list, perhaps you could add too it.

Here's my top two~

I think that Lyndon Baines Johnson and his escalation in Nam coupled with his treasonous cover up of the USS Liberty attack was an idiot. He was the beginning of the puppet brigade, IMHO.

I also despise Woodrow Wilson who must have truly been stupid signing the Federal Reserve Act and lamenting his idiocy afterwards.

abraxas  posted on  2012-05-09   21:32:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: abraxas (#21) (Edited)

Did you see Walter Williams column today?

Leftist Race-Baiters

I hope Williams has his facts straight (he does, btw) because I'm hoping we can get socialist baiting on the program for the 2016 olympics.

From the article:

When Lyndon B. Johnson was in the House of Representatives, he said that President Harry Truman's civil rights program was "a farce and a sham – an effort to set up a police state in the guise of liberty." He continued: "I am opposed to that program. I have voted against the so-called poll tax repeal bill. ... I have voted against the so-called anti-lynching bill." When Johnson had become senator, he observed, "These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days, and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness.

Dakmar  posted on  2012-05-09   21:44:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Dakmar (#22)

So much of the shit we are smelling formed in the colon of Johnson.......here's two more turds~

On October 22, 1968, Lyndon Johnson signed the Gun Control Act of 1968, one of the largest and most far reaching federal gun control laws in American history.

Johnson signed the Immigration Act of 1965.

lol....socialist baiting sounds like a stellar Olympic event, I would watch that one. : )

abraxas  posted on  2012-05-09   21:55:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: abraxas (#23)

I tried explaining Johnson's hypocrisy to a socialist a few months ago, time which would have been better spent arguing the pros and cons of fluoridation with the cat.

from wikipedia:Civil Rights Act of 1957

The Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon Baines Johnson from Texas, realized that the bill and its journey through Congress could tear apart his party, whose southern bloc was anti-civil rights and northern members were more pro-civil rights. Southern senators occupied chairs of numerous important committees due to their long seniority. Johnson sent the bill to the judiciary committee, led by Senator James Eastland from Mississippi, who proceeded to change and alter the bill almost beyond recognition. Senator Richard Russell from Georgia had claimed the bill was an example of the Federal government wanting to impose its laws on states. Johnson sought recognition from civil rights advocates for passing the bill, while also receiving recognition from the mostly southern anti-civil rights Democrats for reducing it so much as to kill it.

I hope you have better luck with this knowledge than I have. :)

Dakmar  posted on  2012-05-09   22:07:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Dakmar (#24)

I tried explaining Johnson's hypocrisy to a socialist a few months ago, time which would have been better spent arguing the pros and cons of fluoridation with the cat.

lol....they will never see that two faced bastard for what he was. It is no surprise that Obama's favorite POTUS other than himself is Johnson.

abraxas  posted on  2012-05-09   22:16:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest