Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: The Most Worthless and Dangerous Degree of All
Source: UncleBob's Treehouse
URL Source: http://uncabob.blogspot.com/
Published: May 9, 2012
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2012-05-09 12:53:45 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 331
Comments: 20

Economics.

Economics is not just a worthless degree. It's downright dangerous.

One of my friends has a Ph.D. in Economics. He considers his colleagues to be clueless, semi-autistic loons. He now knows Ph.D.s are worthless...Master's degrees are worthless...Bachelor's degrees are worthless...even introductory classes are worthless.

Parenthetically, he told me students would come to his office and ask if he was teaching a certain class the next semester. No, he told them. Why?

Because I don't want to take the idiot African who got in on lowered standards, or the woman who makes math mistakes on the blackboard, they told him

I understand, but sorry....I'm not teaching the class next semester.

You can learn all the economics you need to know by reading a few books. One of them is Henry Hazlitt's "Economics in One Lesson," which was written in the 1940s.

Another is Murray Rothbard's "What Has the Government Done to Our Money?"

Those two books will give you 90% of what you need to know.

I proficienced Intro to Macro and Intro to Micro. I'll be damned before I spend a thousand dollars to take two bullshit classes when I could proficiency them.

The dean of the economics department came out and shook my hand. "This is nearly impossible," he told me.

I didn't tell him it wasn't hard. I just the textbooks (Keynesian baloney) and thought about the concepts until I understood them.

The most public economists, such as Paul Krugman, don't know what they are talking about. In other words, they don't understand economics!

Such people are what I refer to as "high-IQ idiots." They think because they have advanced degrees, that somehow confers on them the ability to manage a multi-trillion dollar economy comprising 300 million people. And they really believe they can do it.

Anyone who believes that is a nut.

If these fake economists actually knew what they were talking about, the U.S. wouldn't be in the economic shape it is in. And has been in for the last three years, with no signs of getting better. Or even abating.

Any wages would have stopped going up in 1973. For the matter, the average wage today is lower than it was in 1959.

Economics and political science should be one degree -- Political Economy. Even better, it should include basic law (Natural Law, that is), some ethics, and some religion. Then it should be called Political Philosophy.

One man who understands this is Richard Maybury, who knows that law comes first, followed by economics. The average person is never going to understand economics. But they can understand basic law, such as "Don't steal" and "Keep your word" (which, by the way, is where the religion comes in).

Those two laws created the free market.

On the other hand, the point-and sputter morons from Harvard, Yale and Princeton will continue to scratch whatever passes for their brains and wonder why their Looneytunes theories aren't working.

Because you don't know what you're talking about, that's why.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Turtle (#0)

The Austrian School of Economics is the only credible source if one wishes to study the "dismal science".

If one is motivated, visit mises.org, you can download podcasts, read articles, books, and there are even coursed available on-line, most are free.

The archaic, brick and mortar schools are quickly becoming obsolete, along with their tenured, fembot propagandists, called "Professors".

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2012-05-09   13:08:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lysander_Spooner (#1)

Maybury is an Austrian, as was Hazlitt and, of course, Rothbard.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-09   13:09:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Turtle (#2)

"“Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation.”

David Rockefeller himself was quoted as saying: “Finally, in his most surprising statement, he revealed he considers himself a follower of the Austrian school of economics. Friedrich Hayek had been his tutor at the London School of Economics in the 1930s".

The original Rockefeller was a snake oil salesman. Those that followed bought and paid for idiots such as Mises because they were useful.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-09   13:37:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Turtle (#2)

Yep, here is a great debate between an Austrian, Ron paul, and a Joke, who calls himself an economist. <

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2012-05-09   13:38:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lysander_Spooner (#4)

Which one looks like a clueless autistic nerd/geek?

It aint' Ron Paul!

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-09   13:44:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Turtle (#0)

Is not.

It's "Education".

An old lonely slave comes back from the grave
Searching... searching... searching
For his master who's long gone on

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2012-05-09   13:48:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom (#3)

Those that followed bought and paid for idiots such as Mises because they were useful.

I order you to slap some sense into yourself!

So there.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-09   13:49:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#6)

Is not.

It's "Education"

Is.

So there to you too.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-09   13:52:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Turtle, Prefrontal Vortex (#8)

Both are worthless today.

Advice for men, don't ever date a teacher.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2012-05-09   13:59:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lysander_Spooner (#9)

don't ever date a teacher.

I graduated from the largest producers of teachers in Illinois.

I never met a smart one.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-09   14:03:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#3)

idiots such as Mises

Yet Another Charismatic Rabbi/Guru

Now Rothbard didn't shy away from race, but as ever, the unsaid angle was it was safe for the Juden if whitey notices race -- and die Juden on top -- provided whitey falls for the libertarian/ancap normative con job.

An old lonely slave comes back from the grave
Searching... searching... searching
For his master who's long gone on

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2012-05-09   14:03:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Cynicom (#3)

Those that followed bought and paid for idiots such as Mises because they were useful.

The irony of a loser who spent his entire adult life as a bureaucrat for the federal government calling someone else an idiot is rich.

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

Jesus said, "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do. Evangelical Fundinuts say, "kill them all who will not bow down to the Zionist Jew." - F.A. Hayek Fan

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2012-05-09   14:59:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Turtle (#7)

I order you to slap some sense into yourself!

Rockefeller pawns.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-09   15:04:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Turtle (#0)

I'm not very articulate or much of a writer, BUT JEEBUS TURTLE!!! Please proof read BEFORE you push the post button.

So there!!!!

" Arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics................................ Even if you win, you're still retarded ":

Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities also has the power to make you commit atrocities. –Voltaire

Hmmmmm  posted on  2012-05-09   15:25:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Turtle (#7)

"Miller and Luhnow pulled out all the stops in bringing Milton Friedman and Hayek to Rockefeller-controlled University of Chicago. As pointed out by scholars Philip Mirowski and Robert Van Horn, “Luhnow and the Volker officers were not mere accessories to the rise of the Chicago school: they were hands-on players, determined and persistent in making every dollar count.”

Importantly, the involvement of the Rockefeller dynasty in promoting Austrian economics predates the Volker Fund. Indeed, Rockefeller, who was taught by Hayek in London, “had been intermittently subsidizing Hayek since his Vienna days at Mises’ business cycle institute” according to Mirowski and Van Horn.

Already in 1926, Ludwig von Mises’s first tour in the United States was paid by the Rockefeller Foundation. The National Bureau of Economic Research, which supported Mises in the 1940s, was also heavily sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation. Mises’s salary in New York was paid by Lawrence Fertig, Kohlberg’s colleague at the AJLAC, and by the Volker Fund".

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-09   15:28:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#3)

"“Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation.”

David Rockefeller himself was quoted as saying: “Finally, in his most surprising statement, he revealed he considers himself a follower of the Austrian school of economics. Friedrich Hayek had been his tutor at the London School of Economics in the 1930s".

The original Rockefeller was a snake oil salesman. Those that followed bought and paid for idiots such as Mises because they were useful.

Thanks, maybe we should ponder this info so that when a "gold standard" is promoted we might challenge the notion realizing that he who owns the gold makes the rules.

Future currencies should be based upon a tri-metal standard at a minimum so as to create some modicum of equilibrium between the very rich and the masses.

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-10   5:38:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Hmmmmm (#14)

I'm not very articulate or much of a writer, BUT JEEBUS TURTLE!!! Please proof read BEFORE you push the post button.

Shut up or I'll order you to beat yourself up.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-11   12:53:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Turtle (#17)

Shoe lover. hehehehehehe

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-11   12:57:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#18)

Shoe lover. hehehehehehe

You've just about crossed the line there, buster.

You're lucky Turtle is so good-natured.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-05-11   13:06:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Turtle (#19)

Many people take life too seriously.

If one learns to laff at themselves, life is much better. Self deprecating humor is the best of all.

I never took life serious, much less myself.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-11   13:11:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest