Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Cynicom was right, Ron Paul is a royal turd
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 14, 2012
Author: Moi
Post Date: 2012-05-14 15:43:49 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2892
Comments: 122

As per Drudge, RP just quit the race. I was taken yet again.

Cyni, this is directed to you. You nailed it from the get go, and I got suckered.

I bow to you and accept my heaping portion of crow served anyway you care to deliver it to me.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-53) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#54. To: Cynicom (#44)

Rons supporters SHOULD NOT ABANDON SHIP JUST YET.

Politics is a two way street.

The remaining question is how strong or how tepid will Rons support be for Romney.

From that we can gauge what Ron has gotten or will get in return.

I'm a realist (with romantic tendencies) and am in this for the long haul. While I appreciate the movement that has surface I also conclude that it is larger, spiritually, than just one man, and that is what really scares the elite. They are materialists and hence pathologically frightened by the spiritual.

I think I'll stick with my earlier guessalysis that any expression of support for Oromney will be at best tepid and perfunctory.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   18:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Lysander_Spooner (#40)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

—Samuel Adams

America: Israel's Handmaiden

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-14   18:59:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, 4 (#49)

Speaking for myself, I'm not looking for a leader. I don't need to be led, especially by a politician. I'm looking for someone who will look out for the interests of me and my family by upholding the Constitution of the United States in such a way that the government leaves me the hell alone and allows me to live my life with the least amount of intrusion possible.

I get that H, but tactically, I see zero sense in today's announcement. He was on all the state ballots, and his strategy of delegate accumulation was creeping along, albeit slowly. Why????? announce it's over before Tampa???? Had he simply kept his yap shut he certainly would have garnered more delegates then he will now. I smell the stench of politics. I wish I felt differently.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-05-14   19:01:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#49)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

—Samuel Adams

America: Israel's Handmaiden

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-14   19:01:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Original_Intent (#54)

I think I'll stick with my earlier guessalysis that any expression of support for Oromney will be at best tepid and perfunctory.

I can go with that.

At the very least he must remain neutral, if he goes positive, the degree will an indicator as to the value of the "understanding".

This call for Romney to don kneepads and slink to Israel is disgusting..

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   19:03:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Eric Stratton (#53)

The problem w/ this is that he's pretty much held the same positions throughout his entire career. Have they been "saving him up" for "this day?" There was never a guarantee that he would even make it this far. If not him, due to poor health, then whom?

You can file me in the camp that says that Paul wouldn't have made it thru one term anyway, the "foe" is enormous and earth encompassing and I sense a terminal case of "food poisoning" or the like anyway.

How many others would have run on real issues? I can't think of one other candidate.

But if he wanted to help son Rand, I don't think that this was the way to do it. He'll never have any credibility now.

The problem with the theory that "he did it for Rand" is that it is totally inconsistent with the record you site.

He was gotten to of that I am pretty well convinced but it is all circumstantial, but he had a real, clear to me, change in focus at the time of the SC debates last election cycle. There was a clear difference in the "before and after" and that is why I think he was threatened by what he regarded as a credible threat. If you assume that then everything else begins to make a murky sense.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   19:05:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Original_Intent (#59)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

—Samuel Adams

America: Israel's Handmaiden

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-14   19:11:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Ron Paul's Biggest Donor A Bilderberger!

Oh the irony of it all. On Wednesday, it was disclosed that well known technology investor Peter Thiel is the biggest
donor to Texas Rep. Ron Paul’s Super PAC. Theil, a wealthy international financier
is also a gay libertarian and, wait for it, a member of the steering committee
of the Bilderberg Group! ... (Here is a tissue so you can get that Ron Paul
supporter brains that just exploded all over you out of your shirt. I should
have warned you first. Sorry.)

Thiel contributed a significant $900,000
to a pro-Paul Super PAC “Endorse Liberty.” On Tuesday, the PAC disclosed that
it has raised $3.9 million to date.

The Bilderberg Group is a perennial favorite of the
conspiratorially minded, new world order, trilateral commission types. Ron
Paul, while not a vocal advocate of such conspiracy theories, certainly does
little to dispel such notions among his supporters.

Indeed, as a regular guest of Alex Jones’ conspiracy-focused radio
program, some of his supporters can be forgiven for thinking he held these views himself. Today’s news should dispel his supporters of such notions.


.

Paul himself said that he has no idea what the Bilderberger Group
gathers annual to discuss but it may include “how
they're going to control the banking systems of the world and natural
resources."

Thiel is a major tech investor with an estimated worth of $1.7
billion and a famous libertarian – he has aided foundations that encourage
students to drop out of college in order to promote entrepreneurial ventures
among young people and “seasteading,”
an organization which promotes learning on the high seas in modified floating
colleges governed only by maritime custom law.

The Bilderberger Group, named for the famous Dutch hotel where the
group meets annually, is a secretive organization of wealthy and influential
business leaders that conspiracy theorists believe exercises major influence over the world's leaders from behind the scenes.

http://ology.com/politics/today-lol-ron-pauls-biggest-donor-bilderberger/02012012

Itistoolate  posted on  2012-05-14   19:11:58 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Jethro Tull (#56)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

—Samuel Adams

America: Israel's Handmaiden

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-14   19:13:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Original_Intent (#54)

I think I'll stick with my earlier guessalysis that any expression of support for Oromney will be at best tepid and perfunctory.

Ron can't offer any support for that socialist son of a bitch without being a major hypocrite.

The American public, or at least those that consider voting and politics important, regardless of party affiliation, should storm the RNC in Tampa and beat the shit out of the thugs from the RNC and the media pundits there.

This primary season was an absolute abomination such as the Soviets could never get away with.

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   19:14:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Lod (#52)

He'll do well in Texas (as long as everyone doesn't believe he's actually quit) "again" !

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   19:17:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Eric Stratton (#60)

There was a clear difference in the "before and after" and that is why I think he was threatened by what he regarded as a credible threat. If you assume that then everything else begins to make a murky sense.

Can you clarify that? (not sure what you mean exactly)

It's hard to pin down since I have no direct evidence, but it was as though before the SC debate he was making steady serious inroads, and then all of sudden his attitude changed - it was a subtle change but it was the difference between "fire in the belly" to "making a good show of it" as though he had been convinced that under no circumstances would he be allowed to win. It was at the SC debate where he repudiated all of his 911 Truth supporters in making a statement which was uncharacteristically harsh and absolutely embracing the Party Lyin on 911 - despite what had been coming out the back door that he thought a real investigation was in order.

And when I say credible threat I mean that it came from a source, regardless of the specifics of the threat, for which there was no doubt whatsoever in his mind that "they" could make good on it. In other words he was certain the threat was real and was certain that the people making the threat could and would carry it out if he did not play ball.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   19:33:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Jethro Tull (#56)

I get that H, but tactically, I see zero sense in today's announcement. He was on all the state ballots, and his strategy of delegate accumulation was creeping along, albeit slowly. Why????? announce it's over before Tampa????

Good question. In the announcement it was stated that he did not have the funds to continue in the primary states. I assume that means he isn't going to spend money on advertising in those states or campaigning throughout those states. If that is the case then surely the media would notice. This may have been nothing more than Ron Paul being upfront and honest instead of being sneaky and hoping no one noticed. Hell, who knows how the media would twist that.

Then again, maybe he's been a plant for the last 40 years. If so, then he should receive an academy award because he's bamboozled tens of millions of people.

Maybe I am a rube like others have said but I trust the man. I've been reading his writings since the early 80's. He's walked the walk of his talk as far as I am concerned. When he does things (like this) that I don't understand, then I give him the benefit of the doubt for the simple reason that I think that he truly is a good, decent human being who has the best interests of this country and its people in mind. I'm not a Christian or religious at all but when I think of what a Christian SHOULD be, I think of Ron Paul, as foolish as that may be.

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

Jesus said, "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do. Evangelical Fundinuts say, "kill them all who will not bow down to the Zionist Jew." - F.A. Hayek Fan

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2012-05-14   19:38:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: noone222 (#63)

This primary season was an absolute abomination such as the Soviets could never get away with.

It did have the salubrious effect though of convincing a lot more people that what we have is "Potemkin" Elections - that the facade of one man one vote has ceased to have any substance in reality. FreepTards excepted of course as in their slack jawed, mouth breathing, drooling world anything Faux Nooze or the Mahajunkie says is holy writ that anyone "thinking" - otherwise is a (((((shudder))))) "conspiracy theorist" - and evidence be damned.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   19:39:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#66)

We been so well bamboozled in our lifetimes that it's impossible to know a public man in whom you can invest your trust with absolute certainty, but I have the same feeling about RP.

I really think he has gone as far as a man can go in the name of liberty without being Wellstoned.

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. - H. L. Mencken

randge  posted on  2012-05-14   19:42:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, Jethro Tull (#66)

Then again, maybe he's been a plant for the last 40 years.

No, but the Banksters/Psychs got to him somehow. They found a way 4 years ago to own him.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   19:42:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: randge, F.A. Hayek Fan (#68)

I really think he has gone as far as a man can go in the name of liberty without being Wellstoned.

Exactly. We're now in the position of having t start turning over a lot of rocks and driving out the Psychotics.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-05-14   19:45:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, Jethro Tull (#66)

Then again, maybe he's been a plant for the last 40 years. If so, then he should receive an academy award because he's bamboozled tens of millions of people.

Very good.

Jethro, two others and myself have been discussing this possibility for quite some time. In fact for years.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   19:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Original_Intent, ambi, jethro tull, formerlurker (#38)

as i posted to christine this morning before paul's trotsky2 speech.. did ya'll see that Paul had breakfast with bernanke last week and declined to say what was discussed?

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2012-05-14   19:54:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Artisan (#72)

did ya'll see that Paul had breakfast with bernanke last week and declined to say what was discussed?

Damn.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   19:58:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Artisan, Jethro Tull (#72)

.. did ya'll see that Paul had breakfast with bernanke last week and declined to say what was discussed?

"Wednesday’s visit to the Fed’s Washington headquarters was not the first for Mr. Paul, who has said previously he dined at the central bank with former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker".

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   20:04:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Original_Intent (#69)

No, but the Banksters/Psychs got to him somehow. They found a way 4 years ago to own him.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-05-14   20:07:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Artisan (#72)

yes, I did know about that. I'm curious as to what was discussed now. some sort of threat? who knows. I will be extremely disgusted if Ron endorses Romney. Any bets? I'm going to still say no.

Three grand essentials to happiness in this life are something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

christine  posted on  2012-05-14   20:09:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: christine (#76)

Any bets?

Yep.

Got 20 bucks says even odds Ron stays neutral or endorses.

If he endorses, we WILL ALL KNOW a deal was made.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   20:12:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: Artisan (#72)

did ya'll see that Paul had breakfast with bernanke last week and declined to say what was discussed?

Frankly, I don't think he should speak with Bernanke except "very" publicly.

I feel badly for those supporting him though I can't say I blame them too much. It's hard for people not to get excited about someone touting freedom that has a record of championing it. The thing is that he never made an ounce of difference as far as the agenda is/was concerned - he simply kept those intelligent enough to seek a legitimate change by legitimate means in the game for one more fake-ass election cycle.

The fact that he and his campaign advisors "chose" to make this completely unnecessary statement about quitting the primaries almost makes me sick to my stomach because it makes me think the worst about him. Right before the Texas primary, where he may well have kicked Romney's ass - he forfeits.

Bullshit !

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:15:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: christine (#76)

I will be extremely disgusted if Ron endorses Romney. Any bets? I'm going to still say no.

I'll take that bet. I have a feeling his son's future dedends on it.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2012-05-14   20:18:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: noone222 (#78)

The fact that he and his campaign advisors "chose" to make this completely unnecessary statement about quitting the primaries almost makes me sick to my stomach because it makes me think the worst about him.

This is what simply doesn't wash no matter how one looks at it.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-05-14   20:18:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#66)

Then again, maybe he's been a plant for the last 40 years.

there is no way I can believe that....

Three grand essentials to happiness in this life are something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

christine  posted on  2012-05-14   20:19:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Esso (#79)

ugh.

Three grand essentials to happiness in this life are something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

christine  posted on  2012-05-14   20:20:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Jethro Tull (#80)

This is what simply doesn't wash no matter how one looks at it.

Thusfar, he's been called a lot of names by a few people --- in the future he'll be called a few names by a lot of people.

If he is in fact a con man - he's a damn good one !

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:21:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Cynicom (#77)

If he endorses, we WILL ALL KNOW a deal was made.

The Show this time has more twisty-turnies in it than an Alfred Hitchcock movie.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2012-05-14   20:22:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: noone222 (#83)

Thusfar, he's been called a lot of names by a few people --- in the future he'll be called a few names by a lot of people.

If he is in fact a con man - he's a damn good one !

Yep, and Barnum was right so many years ago.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2012-05-14   20:24:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: noone222 (#78)

The thing is that he never made an ounce of difference as far as the agenda is/was concerned - he simply kept those intelligent enough to seek a legitimate change by legitimate means in the game for one more fake-ass election cycle.

There ya go...

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2012-05-14   20:25:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: noone222 (#78)

Right before the Texas primary, where he may well have kicked Romney's ass - he forfeits.

that shocks me too..

Three grand essentials to happiness in this life are something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

christine  posted on  2012-05-14   20:26:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: christine, JT, Lod, Esso, Artisan, F.A. Hayek (#87)

that shocks me too..

Truthfully, it turned my stomach and made me feel kinda sick.

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:29:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: christine (#87)

Right before the Texas primary, where he may well have kicked Romney's ass - he forfeits.

that shocks me too..

Lots of delegates in Texas !

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:31:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: christine (#81)

there is no way I can believe that....

Never ignore any "possibility" in politics.

Very remote but many people have been wondering.

Go back 100 years to 1912 and Rep. Charles Lindbergh.

Attempts were made on his life and he was run out of politics by the New York times.

Then 1920s/30s Rep Louis McFadden, shot at, poisoned and poison on second attempt got him.

Then 1930s/40s, Charles Lindbergh, son murdered.

What did they all have in common? Very vocal about the bankers and Federal Reserve.

Then Ron Paul current, re elected twelve times as a republican without any opposition.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-14   20:32:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

Yep, and Barnum was right so many years ago.

There's millions of suckers born every election cycle ! (Or something like that).

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:32:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Original_Intent (#65)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

—Samuel Adams

America: Israel's Handmaiden

Eric Stratton  posted on  2012-05-14   20:36:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Cynicom (#90)

Never ignore any "possibility" in politics.

Very remote but many people have been wondering.

Go back 100 years to 1912 and Rep. Charles Lindbergh.

Attempts were made on his life and he was run out of politics by the New York times.

Then 1920s/30s Rep Louis McFadden, shot at, poisoned and poison on second attempt got him.

Then 1930s/40s, Charles Lindbergh, son murdered.

What did they all have in common? Very vocal about the bankers and Federal Reserve.

Then Ron Paul current, re elected twelve times as a republican without any opposition.

Hard to ignore the facts.

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:40:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Jethro Tull (#85)

His epitaph: "I tried to tell them I was a Republican"

"The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests."

The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

noone222  posted on  2012-05-14   20:42:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (95 - 122) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest