Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: War with Iran Imminent: In Days Not Weeks
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://libertarianreview.us/2012/05 ... an-imminent-in-days-not-weeks/
Published: May 18, 2012
Author: Libertarian Review
Post Date: 2012-05-18 10:24:30 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1656
Comments: 27

This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice against Iran and begins military preparations for it. H.Res.568: Eliminating the Most Viable Alternative to War – The House is expected to vote on H.Res. 568. Read the resolution. Section (6) rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran. Section (7) urges the President to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to Iranian enrichment.

This language represents a significant shift in U.S. policy and would guarantee that talks with Iran, currently scheduled for May 23, would fail. Current U.S. policy is that Iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons. Instead, H. Res. 568 draws the “redline” for military action at Iran achieving a nuclear weapons “capability,” a nebulous and undefined term that could include a civilian nuclear program. Indeed, it is likely that a negotiated deal to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and to prevent war would provide for Iranian enrichment for peaceful purposes under the framework of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty with strict safeguards and inspections.

This language makes such a negotiated solution impossible. At the same time, the language lowers the threshold for attacking Iran. Countries with nuclear weapons “capability” could include many other countries like Japan or Brazil. It is an unrealistic threshold.

The Former Chief of Staff of Secretary of State Colin Powell has stated that this resolution “reads like the same sheet of music that got us into the Iraq war.” H.R. 4310: Authorizing War Against Iran and Preparing the Military for it. While H. Res. 568 undermines our diplomatic efforts and lowers the bar for war, H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 begins military preparations for war. Section 1221 makes military action against Iran a U.S. policy. Section 1222 directs our armed forces to prepare for war.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#2. To: christine (#0)

Done deal. Inching closer every day. By the minute now.

House Bill Shifting Red Line for War on Iran Passes Overwhelmingly
The bill calls for a military strike if Iran obtains nuclear "capability"
by John Glaser, May 17, 2012

Print This | Share This

A bill in the House of Representatives has just been passed which inches the United States dangerously close to war with Iran just days ahead of a second round of diplomatic talks with Iran about its nuclear program.

The vote, passed 401-11, effectively calls for a military attack on Iran when it obtains a “nuclear weapons capability” – an undefined term that, by some interpretations, could already apply to Iran, not to mention Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, and any other country with a civilian nuclear program.

“Current U.S. policy is that Iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons,” said Dennis Kucinch (D-Ohio), one of the few who voted against the bill. “Instead, H.Res. 568 draws the red line for military action at Iran achieving a nuclear weapons capability, a nebulous and undefined term that would include a civilian nuclear program.”

The shifting of the so-called “red-line” is instructive. Hawkish rhetoric for some time now has been that Iran is developing nuclear weapons and this provides a pretext for war unless we can reverse their course. The problem is that this rhetoric is not true: the U.S. military and intelligence community are in consensus that Iran has no nuclear weapons program.

And so the red-line shifted to include something Iran is doing, namely enriching uranium for peaceful purposes. Some argue that the Iranian government simply having the know-how for building nukes is enough to attack it, but that is an absurd justification for war if for no other reason that knowledge doesn’t amount to an imminent threat. The attack would therefore be a war of aggression - one without the justification for self-defense - which international law designates a serious war crime.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff for Secretary of State Colin Powell, warned “This resolution reads like the same sheet of music that got us into the Iraq war, and could be the precursor for a war with Iran….it’s effectively a thinly-disguised effort to bless war.”

news.antiwar.com/2012/05/...red-line-for-war-on-iran- passes-overwhelmingly/

randge  posted on  2012-05-18   10:55:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: randge (#2)

A bill in the House of Representatives has just been passed which inches the United States dangerously close to war with Iran just days ahead of a second round of diplomatic talks with Iran about its nuclear program.

The vote, passed 401-11

randge...

For months I have wanted Ron Paul to relegate the Fed to a minor role in his campaign and take up an anti war stance, with a club that American masses understand.

For instance the Founding Fathers gave us the relief from just such a heinous vote by the HOUSE.

If we really are anti war, in one fell swoop we could remove every last one of them that are war mongers in Nov.

Paul would have to have had fire in his gut but to me he could have just maybe staved off this coming shame on America.

That vote count is shameful but it tells us who has a strangle hold on our government.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-05-18   12:26:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#4)

Paul would have to have had fire in his gut but to me he could have just maybe staved off this coming shame on America.

Lindbergh tried that and you see what it got him for his troubles...

Rube Goldberg  posted on  2012-05-18   22:58:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

        There are no replies to Comment # 15.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest