Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Ayn Rand, Sith Lord
Source: Unclebob's Treehouse
URL Source: http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2012/08/ayn-rand-sith-lord.html
Published: Aug 15, 2012
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2012-08-15 11:05:56 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 297
Comments: 7

So Paul Ryan, who looks like a complete dork/nerd/geek, says he was been very much influenced by Ayn Rand. I shake my head.

Ayn Rand's real name was Alice Rosenbaum,and she wasn't American but an immigrant Russian Jew. She was also anti-American, although her followers can't figure that out.

Let's just say I refer to Atlas Shrugged as "the Talmud Lite." These days, Rand would be a neocon. For one thing, even though a rabid atheist, she somehow still supported Israel and considered the Palestinians subhuman if not nonhuman.

Long ago and far away, she'd be a Sith Lord. Darn if I can remember the exact quotes, but the Sith were described as believing in pure good and pure evil. This was apparently a dig at the inept George Bush, as as the bit in one of the movies about "If you're not for us you're against us" (again, not exact an quote).

Those quotes can also apply to Rand, who believed in pure good and pure evil. This was so bad with her that her friends used to argue if she was evil and insane. They couldn't figure it out!

One Objectivist psychologist diagnosed Rand with Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Paranoid Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder. To which I'll add: yep.

To show how crazy she was, she admired a guy named Edward James Hickman. This guy murdered a little girl and cut her body in pieces. Then he dumped her dismembered body in front of her father.

Rand was outraged he was hanged. But then, there are quite a few women out there who are serial killer groupies. Maybe they think these guys and misunderstood and that love will save them. Or maybe it's just that silly female Drama Queen nonsense.

Rand's fans, when confronted with the truth about her, go into immediate brainlock. They can't handle the truth. Cognitive dissonance hurts and they immediately go into the two main psychological defenses: self-deceptive and projection ("You don't understand Rand, but I do! Did you even read her? If you did you didn't understand her!").

Whatever.

Rand is simple to understand, like Communism ("Me good; you bad"). She's also grandiose, and many people fall for that.

For some reason I've always been immune to her. I read Anthem when I was 12 or 13 and it was the only novel I read at that time that disappointed me. And when I read Atlas Shrugged in my 30s I thought, "How can anyone believe this crap?"

Apparently many people do.

Wilfredo Pareto was the guy who came out with the 20/80 Law: 20% of the people have 80% of the brains. 20% of the people have 80% of the wealth. And so on.

Rand's fans think they aren't the 20%. They think they're the one percent, and everyone else is vermin. Let's just say believing that is not conducive to good mental health.

Fortunately Objectivists will go nowhere. The whole movement is just a circle jerk.

As for libertarians, they have to give her up. Libertarians need to become American patriots and stop supporting anti-American beliefs such as open borders. And stop supporting State-created corporate monstrosities such as Wal-Mart, for that matter.

As for Paul Ryan, I hope he's grown up enough to see through Rand. And if he ever says he now considers her nonsense, watch her fans howl. Most probably from their parent's basements, while they lovingly caress their copies of Atlas Shrugged.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Turtle (#0)

Been doing your homework.

Rosenbaum/Rand was a sick Jew.

Paul Ryan BEFORE selected to be VP, was proud to announce that Rand was required reading in his office. Now he seems to want to forget all of that.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-08-15   11:56:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Rosenbaum/Rand was a sick Jew.

These days she'd be a neocon. A really, really ugly neocon.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-08-15   12:10:12 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Turtle (#0)

great article. anyone who is/was an athiest jew should not be lauded. There are many other athiest jews who have a prominent place in society today. wonder why?

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2012-08-15   12:27:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Turtle (#2)

Rosenbaum said the masses were lice, von Misses and that crew cheered her on for telling the truth, to the LICE.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-08-15   14:15:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom, Artisan, Turtle (#4)

The biggest problem with Ayn Rand is that some of what she said/wrote was true. The problem with that is that some people conclude, falsely, that because some is true all is true, and that is not the case.

Perseverent Gardener
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-08-15   14:32:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Original_Intent, Artisan, Turtle (#5)

If any of you have the time and stomach watch this sick interview of Rosenbaum by a groveling Johnny Carson.

No mention that all others are lice.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/browb...how_interview_video_.html

Cynicom  posted on  2012-08-15   14:43:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom (#5)

The biggest problem with Ayn Rand is that some of what she said/wrote was true. The problem with that is that some people conclude, falsely, that because some is true all is true, and that is not the case.

There are two reasons Rand should be ignored.

One, she's a Jew.

Two, she was a woman, and women destroy everything they get involved in (J.K. Rowling is not Edgar Rice Burroughs, for example). Ultimately it's the fault of men for allowing women to do this.

I doubt her being Russian was a problem. But the first two reasons certainly are.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-08-15   15:16:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest