4um: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 24, 2012
Author: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/911-inter
Post Date: 2012-09-24 19:34:06 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 2976
Comments: 145

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/911-intercepted/
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 45.
#2. To: tom007 (#0)
Alleged aircraft hit the buildings????
One can see where this is going. Another waste of time.
Another review by "EXPERTS" that cannot..."AUTHENTICATE"... the government provided material, well then the inference is it may all be LIES, all BOGUS, BECAUSE WE CANNOT PROVE ANYTHING, WHY WASTE YOUR TIME.

Cynicom posted on 2012-09-24 20:38:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: Cynicom, tom007 (#2)
Alleged aircraft hit the buildings????

Are you trying to say that it is 100% certain that the aircraft which struck the towers are the ones reported as being hijacked? If you bothered watching the video, you'd more than likely understand why and how that is highly unlikely.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-24 21:16:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#5. To: FormerLurker (#3)
Are you trying to say that it is 100% certain that the aircraft which struck the towers are the ones reported as being hijacked? If you bothered watching the video, you'd more than likely understand why and how that is highly unlikely.

I dont think so.
I'll stand with my flying telephone poles. Am organizing a panel of "pole" experts as we speak, to address the "alleged" 9/11 event that never happened.

Cynicom posted on 2012-09-24 21:59:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#6. To: Cynicom (#5)
Cyni, 9/11 happened alright, just not the way the talking heads and the politicians claim it did.
What do you make of that van on the George Washington Bridge pulled over on 9/11 after the attacks, you know, the one that was filled with tons of explosives and driven by Israelis?

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-24 22:31:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#7. To: FormerLurker (#6)
What do you make of that van on the George Washington Bridge pulled over on 9/11 after the attacks, you know, the one that was filled with tons of explosives and driven by Israelis?

Good starting point.
Ever notice however there are no panels of experts to prove or disprove they ever existed?

Cynicom posted on 2012-09-24 22:46:24 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: Cynicom (#7)
Ever notice however there are no panels of experts to prove or disprove they ever existed?

News reports from that day, along with FBI documents, indicate they did in fact exist.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-24 23:10:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: FormerLurker (#8)
News reports from that day, along with FBI documents, indicate they did in fact exist.

However, there has never been any independent panel of "experts" that can "prove" the government is lying.

Cynicom posted on 2012-09-25 5:21:30 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#12. To: Cynicom (#10)
However, there has never been any independent panel of "experts" that can "prove" the government is lying.

Ever hear of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, or the producers of this video Pilots for 9/11 Truth?
The government story of the WTC collapse is physically impossible. The Israelis who were arrested on 9/11 with tons of explosives were released with charges.
How much more factual evidence is necessary? Would it take Sean Hannity to report that the government lied on 9/11 to make it so?

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-25 9:25:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#14. To: FormerLurker (#12)
How much more factual evidence is necessary? Would it take Sean Hannity to report that the government lied on 9/11 to make it so?

This is what I spoke of...
"What do you make of that van on the George Washington Bridge pulled over on 9/11 after the attacks, you know, the one that was filled with tons of explosives and driven by Israelis?"
I would like to see a panel of experts or anyone to revisit that.

Cynicom posted on 2012-09-25 9:36:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#17. To: Cynicom (#14)
I would like to see a panel of experts or anyone to revisit that.

All matters pertaining to Israeli involvement in 9/11 is classified.
Here's an interesting video you might want to watch.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-25 10:43:25 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#20. To: FormerLurker (#17)
All matters pertaining to Israeli involvement in 9/11 is classified.

The dog that didn't bark.
Tells ya all ya need to know.

tom007 posted on 2012-09-25 10:51:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#21. To: tom007 (#20)
I wonder how many other people would have gotten away with being caught with tons of explosives in a van on the George Washington Bridge on 9/11, or would have gotten away with blowing up a truck on King St. NYC that morning...

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-25 10:54:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#43. To: FormerLurker (#21) (Edited)
I wonder how many other people would have gotten away with being caught with tons of explosives in a van on the George Washington Bridge on 9/11, or would have gotten away with blowing up a truck on King St. NYC that morning...

Three Comments at Why Were U.S. Intelligence Facilities in an 'Information Void' During the 9-11 Attacks:
1. *all* of the van bombers were *Israelis*.... not a single Arab or Muslim there. Hence the silence.
2. Perhaps by getting "caught" up front and then being summarily dismissed it would end any kind of speculation or investigation of whoever this faction is. You know how people say: "if their was a story there the press would do anything to go after it." So if the topic came up people would think: "oh, they looked into that early on and there was nothing there, otherwise why would they just let those people go."
3. FYI about murals on vans: I had a job in the automotive industry for a while. A friend with a fine arts degree from a top university was making good money painting murals on vans but the work dried up. I asked him why and he said that insurance companies won't cover expensive artwork on vans anymore. Just a little factoid: so you would have to be pretty motivated to put any artwork on a van, depending on how detailed it is.
Edited numbering sequence.

GreyLmist posted on 2012-09-25 18:36:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: GreyLmist (#43)
Guessing that the very least of the mossad's worries was the cost of the murals on the van.
(It was probably self-insured anyway.)

Lod posted on 2012-09-25 18:48:01 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#45. To: Lod (#44)
Guessing that the very least of the mossad's worries was the cost of the murals on the van.
(It was probably self-insured anyway.)

It's almost like they wanted to get caught -- in-line with the 2nd comment:

Perhaps by getting "caught" up front and then being summarily dismissed it would end any kind of speculation or investigation of whoever this faction is. You know how people say: "if their was a story there the press would do anything to go after it." So if the topic came up people would think: "oh, they looked into that early on and there was nothing there, otherwise why would they just let those people go."

GreyLmist posted on 2012-09-25 19:04:42 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 45.
There are no replies to Comment # 45.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 45.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um