4um: Smoke and Mirrors videos-controversy topic

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Smoke and Mirrors videos-controversy topic
Source: various
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/reada ... gi?ArtNum=149329&Disp=671#C671
Published: Sep 29, 2012
Author: Me and various
Post Date: 2012-09-29 01:19:12 by GreyLmist
Keywords: 9/11, NIST, PBS, CBS
Views: 1645
Comments: 94

Relevant info on this topic is accessible through posts #586 and #671 linked below:
4um Title: How 9-11 Was Done

Post #586 -- videos, links, and details
Post #671 -- WETA/PBS addendum info
Poster Comment:
Tangential discussion starting point [#103] at 4um Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11, if needed for referencing here.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#1. To: GreyLmist (#0)
I applaud your efforts.

titorite posted on 2012-09-29 15:49:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#2. To: titorite, GreyLmist (#1)
I applaud your efforts.

I'm sure you would.
So, do the both of you now admit that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is a fraud?

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-29 16:02:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: FormerLurker (#2) (Edited)
DO you admit to being a lying asshole who willingly uses disinformation tactics in an attempt to suppress views counter to your own......I mean you could probably act in a more retarded manner if you tried... but I have trouble imagining it.

titorite posted on 2012-09-29 16:12:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#6. To: titorite (#3)
What's sort of amusing is that YOU are using not only disinfo tactics to "make your case", you're trying to say that a blatently fraudulent video is bonafide actual footage from 9/11.
It's been proven that it's doctored footage of actual CBS live video, and that the author of the video is misrepresenting it as the real thing which he proceeds to "analyze".
Maybe I should repost that proof in case anyone here missed it.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-09-29 20:05:27 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: FormerLurker (#6)
What's sort of amusing is that YOU are using not only disinfo tactics to "make your case", you're trying to say that a blatently fraudulent video is bonafide actual footage from 9/11.

It is not sort of amusing. You are spamming off peoples words because you are Using disinformation tactics.

Let everyone judge your deceptions
vigilantcitizen.com/lates...-rules-of-disinformation/

You are using those rules verbatim by the text book and you are attempting to suppress views counter to your own, only because you refuse to believe what is pointed out in front of you... I mean the size of your denial is HUGE over shadowed only be your willingness to attempt to deceive others.

I don't have to quote the same post four times to address you former lurker. I don't need to spam your words to the back pages so that no body can read them. Thats bad netiqute.

titorite posted on 2012-09-30 15:25:55 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#17. To: titorite (#8)
I think the bozo list is the best place for you. See ya bozo.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-10-01 12:02:27 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#21. To: FormerLurker (#17)
I think the bozo list is the best place for you. See ya bozo.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/lates...-rules-of-disinformation/
HOW TO DECEIVE WITH DISINFORMATION TACTICS
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

The last tactics.... When too much pressure of truth is applied the deceiver can always take his ball and go home so to speak. Here Former Lurker has choosen to invoke his right of bozoing because he has an agenda to push and he has placed that agenda above the truth.

Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.

"When all other possibilities have removed the result, no matter how unlikely, must be correct" |

titorite posted on 2012-10-04 16:19:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#29. To: titorite (#21)
I read your BS when I read 4um without being signed in.
So let me ask you this ONE MORE TIME.
Do you admit that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is a fraud? OR, do you feel that it is bonafide evidence of the "no planes" theory?
Stop your tap dancing and accusations and answer the question. I'd be surprised if you do, since it seems the chances of YOU being a shillster here on this forum are quite high, as you're able to do "controlled opposition" to a tee, yet attack those presenting plausible and workable ideas and theories in regards to what may have happened on the morning of 9/11/2001.
The "no planes theory" is quite implausibile, and if you could discuss it rationally, and if you had any intelligence at all, you'd come to the same realization.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-10-04 20:46:32 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#30. To: FormerLurker (#29)
So much for filters. Maybe you should focus more on keeping your own word with yourself before you begin to interact with others.

BTW the atrocious amount of repetitive replies is seriously unnecessary. You can use your edit button just as most others do... rather than replying over and over and over to the same posts effectively achieving your goal of spamming off the words you don't want shared.
You volunteer for the cointel services way too easily .

titorite posted on 2012-10-04 21:19:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 30.
#32. To: titorite (#30)
Again, instead of spewing nonsense, why don't you answer the two simple questions below;
A) Do you admit that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is a fraud?

B) Do you believe that it is bonafide evidence of the "no planes" theory?

FormerLurker posted on 2012-10-04 21:35:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um