4um: Confirmed: Adam Lanza Was On "Mood Stabilizing" Meds

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News
See other National News Articles
Title: Confirmed: Adam Lanza Was On "Mood Stabilizing" Meds
Source: The Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local ... 1993528222d_story.html?hpid=z2
Published: Dec 14, 2012
Author: Greg Jaffe, Paul Duggan and Colum Lynch
Post Date: 2012-12-15 12:35:58 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *Big Pharma* Subscribe to *Big Pharma*
Keywords: None
Views: 2759
Comments: 45

From The Washington Post

Adam Lanza was his name.
Adam P. Lanza, 20, obscure in life, infamous in death.
A really rambunctious kid, as one former neighbor in Newtown, Conn., recalled him, adding that he was on medication. He was a son of an accountant and a schoolteacher. A family member told investigators that he had a form of autism, a law enforcement official said.

From The Daily Mail UK

It was widely understood that he had mental disabilities - either Asperger syndrome or more severe autism.

A former babysitter told the Washington Post he was 'rambunctious' as a teenager and prone to temper tantrums.

He had to be medicated to control his moods.

Poster Comment:
Instead of gun control, we need oversight of the psychiatric profession and heavily restrict the use of "mood stablizing" meds.Subscribe to *Big Pharma*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
#1. To: FormerLurker (#0)
I've dealt with the autistic. This is bullshit. They don't do this stuff. It was overwhelmingly the medication (I call them "murder/suicide drugs").
And I'll repeat that when someone kills that many children, he is sexually attracted to children.

Turtle posted on 2012-12-15 12:40:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: Turtle (#1)
And I'll repeat that when someone kills that many children, he is sexually attracted to children.

Not saying yes or no to your theory just yet.
But I would like to see the evidence which aided you in drawing your conclusion. ... assuming, of course, that it isn't a series of personal experiences.

Buzzard posted on 2012-12-15 16:36:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#4. To: Buzzard (#3)
that it isn't a series of personal experiences.

It's not, but Google Thomas Watt Hamilton.
Why would someone commit a mass murder of children? He has to have something against them. When people murder people it's because they feel humiliated and want revenge. Why would this guy want revenge against children unless he feels they've done something to him? Like torment him sexually? At least in his own disturbed mind.
Time will tell, at least for those who don't automatically chalk it up to him being a Manchurian zombie with a chip in his head.

Turtle posted on 2012-12-15 18:37:01 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#36. To: Turtle (#4)
Most "logical" explanation I've heard was from a caller to C2C who said Lanza's mother was a teacher's aid who was denied continuation of her job at the school. Running out of money the mother killed herself. Finding her dead incensed Adam who then took it out on the school superintendent and the psychologist who may have recommended against her appointment and the children to underscore his message.

Tatarewicz posted on 2012-12-16 4:49:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#39. To: Tatarewicz (#36)
Most "logical" explanation I've heard was from a caller to C2C who said Lanza's mother was a teacher's aid who was denied continuation of her job at the school. Running out of money the mother killed herself. Finding her dead incensed Adam who then took it out on the school superintendent and the psychologist who may have recommended against her appointment and the children to underscore his message.

This scenario has a more logical basis when one considers her body at home and the balance of the carnage at the school.

noone222 posted on 2012-12-16 9:09:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 39.
#42. To: noone222 (#39)
This scenario has a more logical basis when one considers her body at home and the balance of the carnage at the school.

It's plausible when one considers that many govt employees and their dependents have such a sense of entitlement.
The govt refused to layoff liquor agents after Prohibition ended with the passage of the 21st amendment, and after WACO there was serious consideration of shutting down the ATF but no other agency, i.e., FBI, Secret Service, Postal Investigators needed or wanted the disgraced agents. None of the other federal LEOs wanted the negative association, or to be asked by the public or other cops if he or she once wore the propeller beanie of the ATF.
What they don't show in films such as Deja Vu is, when a heroic ATF agent shows up he or she is there because a tax is allegedly upaid. The only reason the stooges can pretend to be cops is because the FEDS lay a tax on things like marijuana then refuse to sell the stamps to the public, or, they ban the future domestic production or importation of machine guns for civilian ownership, having paid the $200 tax and met other regs regarding storage. Their subject matter jurisdiction is often a direct result of unconstitutional lawmaking and rulings by treasonous judges.

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2012-12-18 11:57:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um