Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.sott.net/article/254873- ... ial-story-spins-out-of-control
Published: Dec 19, 2012
Author: Niall Bradley
Post Date: 2012-12-19 02:55:53 by farmfriend
Keywords: None
Views: 602
Comments: 44

Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control

Niall Bradley
Sott.net
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:21 CST

The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, four days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar 'lone gunman' narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly 'go postal' and target the most vulnerable members of society.

On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final 'official' analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I'm going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:

"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."

~ 2 Corinthians 4:18

The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really happened, so let's fix our eyes on what remains unseen...

A 20-year-old 'tech geek' named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then drove it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.

That's how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?

All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there's any saving grace to be found in this event, it's that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene "instantaneously" and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47 year old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:

~snip~

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

There is lots of stuff at the link I can't copy here.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: farmfriend, HOUNDDAWG, 4um (#0) (Edited)

Police were reportedly on the scene "instantaneously" and by then the shooting had ended.

I wonder if they're measuring that in people "instantaneously" or dog "instantaneously"?

1 people instantaneous = 7 dog instantaneouses, you know.

Esso  posted on  2012-12-19   7:18:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Esso (#1)

or dog "instantaneously"?

LOL

farmfriend  posted on  2012-12-19   11:24:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: farmfriend (#5)

Gun control isn't the issue here. The US government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it's "just a goddamned piece of paper", remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons.

The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by 'communists', 'terrorists', 'insurgents' or 'militants', with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the 'evil-doers'. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.

that conclusion is very likely, imo.

christine  posted on  2012-12-19   19:46:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: christine (#9)

hat conclusion is very likely, imo.

I would have to agree.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-12-19   20:40:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: farmfriend (#10)

We're going to have to change your name to CyniFriend.

Esso  posted on  2012-12-19   20:42:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Esso, christine (#12)

We're going to have to change your name to CyniFriend.

LOL yep.

farmfriend  posted on  2012-12-19   20:42:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

        There are no replies to Comment # 13.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest