4um: The Official Story Of The Sandy Hook School Shooting Is Riddled With Holes

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Resistance
See other Resistance Articles
Title: The Official Story Of The Sandy Hook School Shooting Is Riddled With Holes
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.sandyhookhoax.com/
Published: Dec 31, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-12-31 11:41:43 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Black Ops - Psyops* Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Keywords: None
Views: 11772
Comments: 188

"It seems unbelievable, because it is."Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 63.
#2. To: wudidiz, Itistoolate, noone222 (#0)
This story gets stranger by the day.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-12-31 13:18:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: All (#2)
Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.

FormerLurker posted on 2012-12-31 13:26:59 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#24. To: FormerLurker (#3)
Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.

Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-02 4:12:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#31. To: GreyLmist (#24)
Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.

Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

FormerLurker posted on 2013-01-02 15:43:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#32. To: GreyLmist, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial (#31)
Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

GreyLmist and Parrot,
I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything.
While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition.
Just saying....

scrapper2 posted on 2013-01-02 16:07:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#40. To: scrapper2, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial, wudidiz (#32) (Edited)
FormerLurker: Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

scrapper2: GreyLmist and Parrot,
I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything.
While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition.
Just saying....

scrapper, if you entered this thread at the point of my one sentence reply at Post #24 on what FL had presented and innocuously dubbed as a family-photo of Vicki Soto, I can understand why you mistakenly got the impression, which you apparently did, that I had "drunkenly" introduced the occult angle here and with no basis. What you've described as FL's "tongue-in-cheek observation" (as if a credible rebuttal to my making overmuch, seemingly, about nothing) is actually a backhanded-strawman swipe from FL -- for no apparent reason that I can fathom other than to cause confusion and conflict over what was, until then, simply a conversationally supportive remark (from my video observations) on the occult angle that FL had enlarged upon here after Newtown's Masonic-org medical care complex was noted at Post #1.
Beginning at Post #2, FL presented a 7.5 minute video of Newtown as a major hub of Satanism and then presented the horned hand-gestured Soto family-photo at Post #3, which I made a short comment on 21 posts later. In the meantime, FL had said at Post #6 (as if unaware of the redundant circularity of their opinion) that they were still not convinced the Sandy Hook parents are actors but COULD be Satanists, when their own 7.5 minute video at Post #2 had described Satanists precisely as a network of actors pretending in society that they aren't such. Rather than kick up dust argumentatively by asking FL if they had even watched their own video, I tried to simply show a corroborative example of other investigative research along the very same lines that FL had themself injected into the discussion -- not me or ~~Parrot on Speed Dial~~ Parrot with speed dial either; who had offered their insight-confirmations on the occult issue to me and wudidiz and not to dispute FL or go off-topic of what FL had turned attentions to in this subject multiple times.
And now, here we are in a mixed up mess at the bottom of FL's slippery slope as if they had nothing at all to do with any of that -- just us other "woo-hoos" or whatever -- and you claiming agreement with FL's sarcastic swing. Please try to not be misused so again for their confrontational manuevers, scrapper. Just sayin' and good luck on that.
Edited paragraph 1 + formatting, punctuation and spelling.

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-02 20:56:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#42. To: GreyLmist (#40)
What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.

FormerLurker posted on 2013-01-02 21:44:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#52. To: FormerLurker (#42)
What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.

It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved -- and for no logical reason, imo, other than to smite in spite. It is you who are grasping at absurdity straws and jumping strangely to transmute accusingly even a benevolent, corroborative comment made conversationally (on a topic you yourself had inserted here) into something warranting enmity and a targeted strike from you. Evidently (and typically again of you), even my short, one sentence comment wasn't really comprehensively read by you but you've misread much into it, as usual. FYI: I'm not the analyst who interpreted the "oto" letters as a possible Satanic signal in the name of a possibly fictitious character or Crisis Actor. I merely relayed, as a gesture of support, an abbreviated summary on their video-assessment of it to you in response to the horned hand-gesture signal-issues that you had presented as a meaningfully relevant observation in this discussion. I'm not clear on why you've arbitrarily drawn the line of meaningful occult observation at your input only but go ahead and stomp and swipe like an agitated ogre over it, if you insist on manifesting so. I'll just laugh at your shows of force.

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-02 23:05:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#58. To: GreyLmist, scrapper2 (#52) (Edited)
It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved

Just as in your little circle of pals, you are guilty of projecting your own faults onto others, specifically, those who disagree with you and/or call you on your far fetched schemes.
To see something sinister in a common name is beyond rational. I doubt you would make those claims to people in real life as they may well view you as certifiably insane.
Oh boo hoo hoo, I told you that you were off the deep end because you tried to claim Victoria Soto was satanic JUST BECAUSE the three letters of her name ends with "oto".
That I tried to inject a bit of humor rubs you the wrong way, and now I'm all sorts of bad things.
Now I should get ready for your fellow gang of misfits to come tell me I'm an asshole, a jerk, and all sorts of other things because I popped your little balloon.
You folks are all very quick to pounce on others over perceived wrongs, but cry like little drama queens when someone tries to speak to you as if you were actually adults.

FormerLurker posted on 2013-01-03 22:25:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#60. To: FormerLurker (#58) (Edited)
That post was made yesterday, almost 24 hours ago, in response to your whirlwind wardances in-process then over a short, conversational sentence about somebody else's interpretation of the 3 "oto" letters, as well as a 3 word file-summary comment posted by me, "Noting a resemblance". Since then, I thought we had reached an amicable understanding and had hoped, if I replied to your post here on the issues of the boy, Bear, and his family that you would have the presence of mind to remember that prior conflict was over with -- or so I thought but, apparently, I was wrong about you having that much rationality and composure. Oh, well. I think that's your problem, not mine.
Edited sentence 1 + for grammar and punctuation.

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-03 23:14:20 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#61. To: GreyLmist (#60)
I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.

FormerLurker posted on 2013-01-04 1:46:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#62. To: FormerLurker (#61) (Edited)
I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.

Ok, then. I apologize for the curt reply but would like to suggest a quick check of the posting-date stamp logs before dashing off an unnecessarily overheated message. While I'm here again, am using this time to list some video examples for the record that I've noticed of children and adults outside that day in shirts and no coat/jacket/sweater/sweatshirt -- a number of them even in short sleeve, summery shirts. View at the YouTube sites:
At least 27 dead, including 18 children, in Connecticut school shooting - YouTube
At 0:21 children walking in a line with no coat
Girl in no coat and adult female in short sleeve summer shirt at 1:24
Girl in short sleeves at 1:31 and man at 2:06 in white shirt
Connecticut Shooting: Parents React Dec 14th, 2012
At 0:44 girl in white shirt
At 2:20 woman in short sleeve summer shirt
Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube
At 2:08 female in white shirt
At 2:23 and 2:26 children in short sleeve shirts
US school shooting: Children tell of terror
At 0:22 boy in green shirt with scarf but no coat; 0:36 girl in white shirt
At 1:10-1:20 several with no coat, including a baby boy in green shirt
Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube
Baby in green shirt with no coat at 1:21; also seen in the previous video and the one below
Man in background wearing short sleeve summer shirt at 1:52
Sandy Hook Massacre Exposed? (With Evidence) 1/2
At 12:17 shirt sleeves, including baby boy in green shirt
Edited for video notations, time-stamp markers and sequence order. Also to add this child in no coat pic example not seen in those videos:

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-04 4:52:17 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#63. To: GreyLmist (#62) (Edited)
All the plates are nice and neatly covered... That ford is very dusty.

That has to be the most awkward way to run I have ever seen....
I would have to shun the stupidity and run for my life proper.

Love how that cop is too weak to pick up a small 50 pound girl and RUN!!!.. nope... Not these actors.

titorite posted on 2013-01-04 6:02:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 63.
#64. To: titorite (#63)
Astute observations, titorite. Thanks for your analysis of the pic.

GreyLmist posted on 2013-01-04 06:10:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 63.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um