Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: The Official Story Of The Sandy Hook School Shooting Is Riddled With Holes
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.sandyhookhoax.com/
Published: Dec 31, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-12-31 11:41:43 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Black Ops - Psyops*     Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Keywords: None
Views: 11745
Comments: 188

"It seems unbelievable, because it is."Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

#2. To: wudidiz, Itistoolate, noone222 (#0)

This story gets stranger by the day.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-31   13:18:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-31   13:26:59 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: FormerLurker (#3)

Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.

Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-02   4:12:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: GreyLmist (#24)

Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.

Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-01-02   15:43:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: GreyLmist, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial (#31)

Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

GreyLmist and Parrot,

I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything.

While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition.

Just saying....

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-02   16:07:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: scrapper2, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial, wudidiz (#32) (Edited)

FormerLurker: Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?

scrapper2: GreyLmist and Parrot,

I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything.

While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition.

Just saying....

scrapper, if you entered this thread at the point of my one sentence reply at Post #24 on what FL had presented and innocuously dubbed as a family-photo of Vicki Soto, I can understand why you mistakenly got the impression, which you apparently did, that I had "drunkenly" introduced the occult angle here and with no basis. What you've described as FL's "tongue-in-cheek observation" (as if a credible rebuttal to my making overmuch, seemingly, about nothing) is actually a backhanded-strawman swipe from FL -- for no apparent reason that I can fathom other than to cause confusion and conflict over what was, until then, simply a conversationally supportive remark (from my video observations) on the occult angle that FL had enlarged upon here after Newtown's Masonic-org medical care complex was noted at Post #1.

Beginning at Post #2, FL presented a 7.5 minute video of Newtown as a major hub of Satanism and then presented the horned hand-gestured Soto family-photo at Post #3, which I made a short comment on 21 posts later. In the meantime, FL had said at Post #6 (as if unaware of the redundant circularity of their opinion) that they were still not convinced the Sandy Hook parents are actors but COULD be Satanists, when their own 7.5 minute video at Post #2 had described Satanists precisely as a network of actors pretending in society that they aren't such. Rather than kick up dust argumentatively by asking FL if they had even watched their own video, I tried to simply show a corroborative example of other investigative research along the very same lines that FL had themself injected into the discussion -- not me or Parrot on Speed Dial Parrot with speed dial either; who had offered their insight-confirmations on the occult issue to me and wudidiz and not to dispute FL or go off-topic of what FL had turned attentions to in this subject multiple times.

And now, here we are in a mixed up mess at the bottom of FL's slippery slope as if they had nothing at all to do with any of that -- just us other "woo-hoos" or whatever -- and you claiming agreement with FL's sarcastic swing. Please try to not be misused so again for their confrontational manuevers, scrapper. Just sayin' and good luck on that.

Edited paragraph 1 + formatting, punctuation and spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-02   20:56:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: GreyLmist (#40)

What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-01-02   21:44:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: FormerLurker (#42)

What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.

It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved -- and for no logical reason, imo, other than to smite in spite. It is you who are grasping at absurdity straws and jumping strangely to transmute accusingly even a benevolent, corroborative comment made conversationally (on a topic you yourself had inserted here) into something warranting enmity and a targeted strike from you. Evidently (and typically again of you), even my short, one sentence comment wasn't really comprehensively read by you but you've misread much into it, as usual. FYI: I'm not the analyst who interpreted the "oto" letters as a possible Satanic signal in the name of a possibly fictitious character or Crisis Actor. I merely relayed, as a gesture of support, an abbreviated summary on their video-assessment of it to you in response to the horned hand-gesture signal-issues that you had presented as a meaningfully relevant observation in this discussion. I'm not clear on why you've arbitrarily drawn the line of meaningful occult observation at your input only but go ahead and stomp and swipe like an agitated ogre over it, if you insist on manifesting so. I'll just laugh at your shows of force.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-02   23:05:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: GreyLmist, scrapper2 (#52) (Edited)

It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved

Just as in your little circle of pals, you are guilty of projecting your own faults onto others, specifically, those who disagree with you and/or call you on your far fetched schemes.

To see something sinister in a common name is beyond rational. I doubt you would make those claims to people in real life as they may well view you as certifiably insane.

Oh boo hoo hoo, I told you that you were off the deep end because you tried to claim Victoria Soto was satanic JUST BECAUSE the three letters of her name ends with "oto".

That I tried to inject a bit of humor rubs you the wrong way, and now I'm all sorts of bad things.

Now I should get ready for your fellow gang of misfits to come tell me I'm an asshole, a jerk, and all sorts of other things because I popped your little balloon.

You folks are all very quick to pounce on others over perceived wrongs, but cry like little drama queens when someone tries to speak to you as if you were actually adults.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-01-03   22:25:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: FormerLurker (#58) (Edited)

That post was made yesterday, almost 24 hours ago, in response to your whirlwind wardances in-process then over a short, conversational sentence about somebody else's interpretation of the 3 "oto" letters, as well as a 3 word file-summary comment posted by me, "Noting a resemblance". Since then, I thought we had reached an amicable understanding and had hoped, if I replied to your post here on the issues of the boy, Bear, and his family that you would have the presence of mind to remember that prior conflict was over with -- or so I thought but, apparently, I was wrong about you having that much rationality and composure. Oh, well. I think that's your problem, not mine.

Edited sentence 1 + for grammar and punctuation.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-03   23:14:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: GreyLmist (#60)

I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-01-04   1:46:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: FormerLurker (#61) (Edited)

I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.

Ok, then. I apologize for the curt reply but would like to suggest a quick check of the posting-date stamp logs before dashing off an unnecessarily overheated message. While I'm here again, am using this time to list some video examples for the record that I've noticed of children and adults outside that day in shirts and no coat/jacket/sweater/sweatshirt -- a number of them even in short sleeve, summery shirts. View at the YouTube sites:

At least 27 dead, including 18 children, in Connecticut school shooting - YouTube
At 0:21 children walking in a line with no coat
Girl in no coat and adult female in short sleeve summer shirt at 1:24
Girl in short sleeves at 1:31 and man at 2:06 in white shirt

Connecticut Shooting: Parents React Dec 14th, 2012
At 0:44 girl in white shirt
At 2:20 woman in short sleeve summer shirt

Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube
At 2:08 female in white shirt
At 2:23 and 2:26 children in short sleeve shirts

US school shooting: Children tell of terror
At 0:22 boy in green shirt with scarf but no coat; 0:36 girl in white shirt
At 1:10-1:20 several with no coat, including a baby boy in green shirt

Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube
Baby in green shirt with no coat at 1:21; also seen in the previous video and the one below
Man in background wearing short sleeve summer shirt at 1:52

Sandy Hook Massacre Exposed? (With Evidence) 1/2
At 12:17 shirt sleeves, including baby boy in green shirt

Edited for video notations, time-stamp markers and sequence order. Also to add this child in no coat pic example not seen in those videos:

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-04   4:52:17 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: All (#62) (Edited)

More examples of children and adults outside that day in shirts and no coat/jacket/sweater/sweatshirt -- a number of them in short sleeve, summery shirts and even one male in shorts:


Girls with no coats


Boy in a T-shirt, man in a white shirt, boy in an orange shirt


Boy in orange shirt again


Girl in a thin, short sleeve shirt


Boy in a thin shirt; last name: Nikitchyuk, nickname: Bear


Female in a white shirt; Carlee Soto?


Girl with no coat, thin shirt(s)


Child with no coat, thin shirt(s)


Boy with no coat, looks like 2 thin shirts


Boy in a blue shirt but could be a sweatshirt


Female in a black shirt


Man in a black shirt


Man in a purple shirt, woman in a white and blue shirt


Man in a blue T- shirt


Woman in a shirt with alleged Sandy Hook parent, male in shorts and a shirt


Child in a short sleeve shirt bottom right corner, others with no coats


No coats, female in short sleeves


Child with thin shirt(s) and no coat. CNN [Updated at 2:45 p.m. ET]: Various locations are being used as staging areas around Newtown. This is outside the Newtown Methodist Church near the school where a woman is hugging a child.

Sandy Hook Elementary School Nurse Sally Cox EXPOSED Newtown Shooting FRAUD - YouTube

At 1:29-1:32 boy in short sleeve shirt, female in white shirt

At 1:37-1:41 several children with no coats and thin shirts, two in short sleeve shirts

At 6:49 boys with thin shirts and no coats, one in short sleeves

Edited to change paths for pics #3 and #4 that weren't working + added several more pics and made some changes in pic descriptions.

Re-edited to add 3 more pics:


Two children in bottom right corner with no coats


Boy with no coat


Several children with no coats, two in short sleeves

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-06   8:43:17 ET  (21 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: GreyLmist (#67) (Edited)

i guess at least one of those pics is a fake

"...Drill before the event: A highly circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file formation with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet this was the image of a drill event that took place some months prior to the event itself...."

Sandy Hook: US State-Fabricated Terror

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=62991

edit. I was out in the sticks for over a month...far far away from the media...while all this was happening. I take it you already know what I am just finding out. Did a search last night "terror drill at sandy hook elementary". These people have no shame using kids as pawns in their little games. And then expect Americans to give up their guns "for the children".

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2013-01-10   5:11:32 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 77.

#79. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#77)

edit. I was out in the sticks for over a month...far far away from the media...while all this was happening. I take it you already know what I am just finding out. Did a search last night "terror drill at sandy hook elementary". These people have no shame using kids as pawns in their little games. And then expect Americans to give up their guns "for the children".

I was wondering where you've been. Thanks for the link and your thoughts. They are terrorizing the psyches of the children with their BlackOp/PsyWar routines.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-01-10 08:44:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#181. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#77) (Edited)

"...Drill before the event: A highly circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file formation with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet this was the image of a drill event that took place some months prior to the event itself...."

Cross-referencing Post #7 at 4um Title: Joyce Riley Interviews Mike Powers Sandy Hook Investigation (Edited version no commercials)

Re: interview statements by the alleged school nurse, the Paley twins, and student Ella Seaver on being told to close their eyes while walking; similar to Barry Jennings' statement about being instructed repeatedly by a firefighter to not look down while walking through WTC 7.

Edited for spacing.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-02-08 00:34:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest