Digger shared a link with me that contains a sequence of events from a video that focuses on the double amputee that supposedly had his legs blown off. I want to share those with you here and ask you, especially if you have any trauma medical background (in the Armed Forces or ER or whatever), what is wrong with these pictures? (pictures and narrative by Fist-Of-Freedom)

Something about this entire thing smells to high heaven. When have you ever heard of someone with a blown off leg not bleeding? Some make the claim that it was cauterized, but obviously, the picture of them wheeling the guy out on the wheelchair shows ‘blood and gore’ (a cauterization is a burn that seals the wound). Something changed between these images and when they wheeled him out in front of the cameras.

And there is more analysis from Fist-Of-Freedom:

This image was taken by a third party photographer seconds after the first explosion. There is clear evidence of false flag staging here. The man in the red coat and baseball hat on the right is kneeling down giving directions to the guy in the white T-shirt. Also looking to this pair for direction are the woman sitting to the right and the man in a hood and sunglasses who set up the double amputee prosthetics.
Notice the relaxed posture and face of the hooded man. Notice also the calm prepared posture of the woman sitting down on the bottom right. See how her shirt sleeve is severely torn, yet her skin underneath is clean and clear of injury and blood. From where she’s sitting look right to the bottom right corner and you can see an unmarked bottle of fake blood.
Look to the left and see the cowboy hat man standing there doing nothing. This is the same man who will pretend to hold the tourniquet of the fake amputee actor later on. Look to center of the photo and you will see the african woman moving herself away from the amputee actor since her shielding him from camera’s job is over. Next to her is a woman with red hair leaning on her elbow.

Compare this now with another photo taken seconds later. Putting them side by side is very helpful.
The man with the hood and sunglasses, who was just sitting up looking fine and healthy after fixing up the amputee actor’s prosthetics, is now on his back being evaluated by two people. Notice the rips in his jeans have no sign of blood or injury on the skin. The woman with red hair however is in the exact same pose as a minute ago. Meanwhile the double amputee actor is completely ignored by everyone when he is clearly in the most dire need of attention. There is a small amount of fake blood around him where the african lady shielding him used to be, she has dissappeared. What happened to her? Compare this photo with the first in my post.

The african woman who was sitting up, shielding the hooded man and amputee actor’s prosthetic rigging, giving hand signals, looking left and right, having no visible blood or injuries, is now covered in blood and strapped into a spine board stretcher.
In a real medical scenario the amuptee would receive immediate treatment or die from bleed out. The fact this actor woman is removed from the scene via stretcher while the double amputee is left on the ground is ludacris. He would be dead from blood lose before they could even begin spinal assessment procedures involved in moving a patient to a stretched. Not to mention his blood lose would be over five liters, enough to cover the entire scene around these people in a thick puddle.

From firsthand experience with trauma in the field of EMS work, this is not real. These are actors. This is all staged.

I know that many just want to believe. But I can’t help but think. So much doesn’t add up.

So, are you just a Believer or Do You Think? (Thanks, Digger)

UPDATED 4/21/13

KPatrickRyan shared an updated picture of the Bauman guy in the hospital (visited by Bradley Cooper). Compare him to the wheelchair man (Vogt???) and tell me who’s who.

ht_bradley_cooper_boston_nt_130419_wblog

516d8f3bb81eb.image

original

#10. To: wudidiz, christine, BTP Holdings, ada, Jethro Tull, *9-11*, *WAR CRIMES*, *9-11* (#0)

Okay, I'm bewildered. I agree that something is 'way off' in these pictures. The pictures might well be another "smoking gun;" but I advise caution until their 'solid' context can be established. My eyes and mind are wide open.

When & where did these photos actually originate? Can anyone authenticate these as actually coming from the factual 4-15 bombings? My current impression is that these are from an emergency response training video, however 'consistent' that they may be. Coincidence? If so, that's still not good news.

Remembering the phony 'security' video of the fiery 9-11 B-757 Pentagon impact, no possibilities should be overlooked.

I'd suggest that all initially be careful with these pictures. It's possible to permanently hook one's personal credibility to a falling star; for all otherwise good & noble intentions.

Having dealt with more than my fair share of disinformationists; these could be the stuff of the proverbial 'red herring.'

However, if these are from an emergency response training video, do they add to the 'prior knowledge' issue? For the moment, I'd say so. Again, what is their origin?

I went into the html code of a 'hosting' website & discovered that I knew one of those employing those pictures. I sent him an E-Mail; but haven't heard back. I'm reasonably sure that I will. He & I have compared a lot of notes over the years.

So far, there are at least four approaches to convince most that 4-15 is another inside job - and a terrifying reality. Those pictures could make a major contribution; depending upon their history.

Alex Jones cited the tremendous traffic volume that he was getting, just on the Glenn Beck 'revelation.' I think more people are paying attention, than we'd ordinarily be tempted to believe.

The Beck 'revelation' may be overblown, for the time being; but I think it may ultimately be more powerful than most would expect. For one thing, before 9-11, the Saudis were documented to be the major financiers of a long list of terrorist groups. I don't think that the core issue is the 'guilt' of the Saudis; versus the illustration of the U.S. 'higher-ups' continued sanctioning of the Saudis' power/influence and 'terror' complicity - to the exclusive benefit of corporate profits & campaign funding - and good ol' political "graft," of course.

In the background, the corroborating content of Lieutenant Colonel Potter's latest video is independently having a major impact. Among other assertions, he makes a case for black ops 'rogue' elements being standard (don't ask; don't tell) features in all the major alphabet agencies. If it's any indication, I'm not tempted to debate a single one of his points. (That statement may not make me 'popular,' but .... .)

My hunch goes to the probability that the 'accuracy' of the 'truth' positions isn't the 'official' concern; as opposed to their estimated probable effect on the mindset of the American public - relative to upcoming events, i.e., another "war" or still more powerful "Police State" legislation. If 'America' calls bullshit on the 4-15 events; there won't be sufficient support for whatever is 'secretly' in store - whatever that may be.

I think the biggest 'clue,' now in sight, is the 'classified' briefing on the FBI's presumed 'failure,' leading up to the 4-15 events. Who isn't asking why the 'briefing' is classified; add what the reality is? Ask also, why is Napolitano angrily denying the obvious? What agenda is she so passionately protecting? Saudi oil/money; or ....

"Bienvenido! No es los Estados Unidos; es Norte Mexico! Tengo mucho trabajo por su; pero dinero poquito. Es OK; si? Por favor; vote para mi! Gracias. Oh, donde es los narcoticos?"

("Welcome! It's not the United States; it's North Mexico! I have a lot of work for you; but not much money. That's okay, right? Please; vote for me! Thanks. Oh, where are the drugs?")

Given the 4-15 timing, vs. Obama's recent and highly unusual rage over the failure of the gun legislation, I'm far more concerned about an impending police state. If the legislation had passed, 4-15 would have consequently given him his "Perfect Storm (Troopers)."

At least for the moment, the NRA is (blessedly) having a field day with the "We told ya so ... no guns required!" illustration. I wish Lapierre would send Obama a copy of the failed legislation document, with "guns" crossed out - inserting "IEDs." (Damn! How could one contact Jay Leno's producers?)

I think it's appropriately called "Coercive Persuasion;" the 'stuff' of Jonestown.

the problems started right from the start, as crusader bunnypants' saudi friends disappeared into the night and half-a-dozen of the saudi "hijackers" turned up alive and pissed off.

so the "blame the saudis" idea didnt grow any wings, and the focus shifted to bin laden and afghanistan...

so now, except for the religious and racial fanatics, the focus has turned to loot... and it becomes necessary, once in a while, to stage some outrage that will distract us from looting operations like the gold market manipulation

whatever, these chechen terrorists are allied with the israeli american neocons... so they might be susceptible to staging bombings that are good for israel

doesnt make much sense, really, from the chechen kids' point of view... seeing as how it is about the same thing as a suicide bombing

...but it makes lots of sense from the neocon/israeli perspective if it creates support for israel when israelis are acknowledging that their hasbara has failed.

anyhow, it looks to me like anyone who's been paying attention will already know all this stuff... so the boston bombing is likely to backfire on the neocons and israelis, whether it was a false flag or not.

Do you know of any images of fatalities from the boston marathon other than this one?