Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Keiser: The Collapse of the Current Bankster Regime is Upon Us
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/keiser-the- ... nt-bankster-regime-is-upon-us/
Published: Jun 17, 2013
Author: Max Keiser
Post Date: 2013-06-17 13:22:26 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 4196
Comments: 64

We’re in a post-capitalist, post-socialism world. I have just come back from the G8 protests in Belfast and it occurred to me – at this point; we’re post both capitalism and socialism – and this point needs to be made clear, but we also see some vestiges of both systems in a new, emerging economy that has yet to be named.

I agree with the G8 protesters in Belfast that capitalism – as it’s been iterated in the West in the post WWII era has run its course. The main cause for its demise, as I see it, is that during the 1980’s; thanks to deregulation, futures and options speculation and leverage migrated over to the burgeoning field of ‘financial futures’ and the price discovery mechanism associated with supply and demand and the ‘invisible hand’ – over the ensuing few decades – completely broke down. Money itself lost any anchor to value as futures traders speculated with virtually no risk on contracts worth many billions that had been willed into existence by financial engineers not by dint of any underlying economic activity.

And there’s no going back now. You see, financial futures are trading on prices that are based – not on any underlying economic reality – but rather a series of assumptions based on academically-concatenated theories and theorems which in turn generate a new set of prices. The result is that capital flows into destabilizing ‘malinvestments’ all hidden by the outsized returns of intermediaries like hedge funds who make billions mining what has become essentially a broken system of monetizing fraud.

Since the rising unemployment and social unrest these financially engineered malinvestments produce is ignored, because hedge funds have been making lots of money, nobody is willing to step forward and suggest that making money at the expense of a sound market might be a bad thing. The fake prices are never questioned and the fraudulently garnered riches are always celebrated.

Prices for all commodities and securities have permanently lost their connection to a functioning economy. Once a pickle, never a cucumber. Financialized capitalism is now in its death throes.

What about socialism?

As that term is generally understood – it has also burnt out. Central planning, hierarchical governments, and doctrines guaranteeing ‘fairness’ simply don’t work; primarily because all centrally planned systems of markets and governments fail the ‘naturalness’ test. Nothing in nature works for long that is so rigid and unadaptable as man made experiments in central planning except for a few parasites and cancer.

Today we have hybrid models that contain bits from the previous schools that are racing ahead to fill the vacuum left by collapse of both capitalism and socialism.

Crowdfunding is an emergent idea. It owes a debt of gratitude to socialism. It’s part of ‘social networking,’ a phenomenon of leveraging the ‘the whole is greater than the sum of the parts’ idea. Keep in mind that Google’s multi-billion dollar valuation is driven by billions of individuals donating their time and creativity to the collective. So too for ‘open-source’ software and p2p file swapping. But there is also a necessary component of competition associated with free market capitalism in crowd funding. A platform like Kickstarter allows for ideas to compete in a free market – where the funds flow where the market goes; not where a central planner wants funds to go.

Bitcoin is also a post capitalism/socialism hybrid. It’s growth is driven by a hard coded, centrally imagined algorithm while it’s adoption is possible via the free market activities of users who are rejecting centrally planned, bogus fiat currencies like Pounds, Dollars, and Yen and using Bitcoin instead.

The collapse of the current bankster regime is upon us. This means a whole new set of winners and losers. The point is that it’s not all grim. The future is being imagined and implemented as we speak.

Special for Infowars from Max Keiser, host of Russia Today’s Keiser Report, a no holds barred look at the shocking scandals behind the global financial headlines. See his latest report discussing the price holograms in a simulated economy.


Poster Comment:

Max has a limited perspective.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#1. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

The Collapse of the Current Bankster Regime is Upon Us

Max has a limited perspective.

I really cannot wait for the FED to collapse. It has been robbing the people blind for too many years.

What we will get in its place is hard to tell at this point. But, hopefully those traitors in the District of Criminals will get some spines and give us something honest that we can all live with.

I hear Bitcoin has a few advantages over traditional fiat currency.

There is no money since the abrogation of the gold standard. All debts MUST be discharged. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-06-17   16:43:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BTP Holdings (#1)

There is no money since the abrogation of the gold standard. All debts MUST be discharged. ;)

Interesting.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-06-17   19:28:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#2)

There is no money since the abrogation of the gold standard. All debts MUST be discharged. ;)

Interesting.

There is also NO CONSTITUTION for the same reason, at least not in the jurisdictional environment of COMMERCE where debt is monetized but it's not constitutional money.

As long as we had Constitutionally authorized "MONEY" we had a Constitution.

noone222  posted on  2013-06-17   20:11:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: noone222 (#3)

There is also NO CONSTITUTION

I have a book at home titled, "Constitution, Fact or Fiction". Have not read it in a while but it seems to me that you are correct about what you say. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-06-18   16:50:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: BTP Holdings, noone222 (#6)

noone222 at Post #3: There is also NO CONSTITUTION

BTP Holdings at Post #6: I have a book at home titled, "Constitution, Fact or Fiction". Have not read it in a while but it seems to me that you are correct about what you say. ;)

Jumpin' Jimminy Crickets! You are not being helpful to the case you presented yourself at Post #1, BTP: "There is no money since the abrogation of the gold standard. All debts MUST be discharged. ;)"

On what basis of law, praytell, would your call to cancel all debts as unrepayable due to the abrogation of the gold standard be even partially correct without the Constitution's stipulation that the States make nothing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment for their debt purposes?

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-06-18   17:26:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GreyLmist (#8) (Edited)

On what basis of law, praytell, would your call to cancel all debts as unrepayable due to the abrogation of the gold standard be even partially correct without the Constitution's stipulation that the States make nothing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment for their debt purposes?

The founders knew that meaningless "promises to pay" (commercial paper) utilized by banksters and merchants should not be associated in any way with their Constitutional Govt, and to this day it isn't associated with the organic, Constitutional Government. It is the property of the FEDERAL RESERVE, permitted by the UNITED STATES INCORPORATED.

Today, those with bank accounts are considered under their laws as CREDITORS to the bank where they thought they had a deposit and will be treated as such when the banks collapse.

Have you collected the interest on your loan TO THE BANK ?

EDIT: Isn't that usury ?

Of course, most Americans are card carrying members of the FEDERAL SYSTEM (which shouldn't be confused with the National Government) that operates within the UNITED STATES CORP. through socialist security - which the framers would have scoffed into oblivion.

noone222  posted on  2013-06-18   18:08:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: noone222, BTP Holdings (#9) (Edited)

noone222 at Post #5 and Post #9

So, discharging debt is the proper terminology for the issue rather than cancellation of debt. Ok, will use that phrasing instead. As you might recall, noone, I'm not much of a goldbug except on the matter of States being directed by the Constitution to use gold and silver for their debt purposes, fixed in value to a Standard of Weights and Measures set by Congress rather than erratic market fluctuations. I think that some of our problem is that fiat-issued money looks the same as money earned by We the People in exchange for our goods and services. I don't think it's the paper-form itself that is undermining our Republic when that paper represents actual time and effort invested in producing goods and services. Usurious/debt-based/fractional reserve/fiat conjured pretend money should be stamped with a warning label about that and money issued to We the People for our economic and societal contributions should be stamped as sound, production-backed and approved by the government. Neither do I think that businesses can override the Constitution by contracts that violate it and interfere with our right to a Republican form of government rather than a gambling casino-model run by Mafiosos. If they could just do whatever they want contractually, the Supreme Court and others would be less busy, imo.

We might not be able to agree on all of that but I was watching videos on Nixon's speech about taking America off the gold standard and would like to point out that he said it was a temporary measure to defend the dollar from speculators, with conditional exceptions for convertability to gold in the interest of monetary stability. He was wrong that it would keep our money from losing value and Constitutionally wrong on other points in the speech (like taxing imports himself, for instance) but am posting it below because I would like to hear your opinions and others on the temporary and conditional aspects that he mentioned around the 1:00 mark:

Nixon Ends Bretton Woods International Monetary System -- 4 minutes

Edited for formatting.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-06-18   21:50:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GreyLmist (#10) (Edited)

Neither do I think that businesses can override the Constitution by contracts that violate it and interfere with our right to a Republican form of government rather than a gambling casino-model run by Mafiosos. If they could just do whatever they want contractually, the Supreme Court and others would be less busy, imo.

When a contract is lawfully entered into, the parties to it are bound by its terms. This is the law, Commercial Law, that is.

It seems that we are being run more and more by the corporations since the Republic that Ben Franklin spoke of no longer exists because of the aforementioned Act of 1871, which turned the U.S. Government into a corporation. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-06-19   17:05:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: BTP Holdings (#13)

You at #13 of this thread:

It seems that we are being run more and more by the corporations since the Republic that Ben Franklin spoke of no longer exists because of the aforementioned Act of 1871, which turned the U.S. Government into a corporation. ;)

Your Post #19 at 4um Title: They’re closing libraries in London and New York

Sad to tell you but the U.S. Government IS a corporation spelled in all capital letters, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. This law was passed in 1871. So, it seems they have been doing this to us for far too long. It's long past time to get out from under it. I have already done so by filing my Security Agreement. This is a sure thing in a world in which there are far too many variables.;)

Who would be the Board of Directors? We the People of the Constitution, in which case we could simply dissolve the corporation and reseat our legitimate government with Constitutionalists. But we aren't obligated to dissolve what isn't Constitutionally valid, so we could proceed without that delaying formality and go directly to the reseating stage even quicker.

The U.S. Government was not really turned into a corporate dictatorship of our nation by the formation through the years of D.C. as our capital. That meme has been promulgated as a false obstacle course to deplete the morale and numbers of Patriots with defeatism. Please review Post #35 of 4um Title: The CIA controls Evergreen Air Death Dumps

by the Act of 1871, [Washington D.C.'s] territory was limited to the District of Columbia and it was defined as a municipal corporation, which means it was limited to the affairs of city government. Three years later, on June 20, 1874, a new Act was passed by Congress that abolished the original city government and replaced it with a three-man [city] commission, appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. Its scope as a municipality did not change. A third Act of Congress, dated June 11, 1878, clarified the powers of the [city] Commission but retained all the essential features of the previous Act, especially those that defined the nature of the District of Columbia as a municipal administrative unit.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-06-21   13:40:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: GreyLmist (#16) (Edited)

Who would be the Board of Directors?

The Board of Directors of the United States Government is the United States Congress. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-06-22   14:26:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

#22. To: BTP Holdings (#19)

Me: Who would be the Board of Directors?

BTP Holdings: The Board of Directors of the United States Government is the United States Congress. ;)

They don't get to be the acting Board of Directors with any legitimacy when they're in rebellion against the Constitution. That job then goes to the States. If they're in rebellion against the Constitution too, then it gets reassigned to We the People of America's Constitutional Republic who are the actual Board of Directors that they are all supposed to be working for anyway. ;)

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-07-15 05:36:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest