Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 18, 2013
Author: Adolf Wolf
Post Date: 2013-10-18 19:16:58 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 150
Comments: 7

Published on Sep 23, 2013

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)

This is great.

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.

Paul Craig Roberts

James Deffenbach  posted on  2013-10-18   20:50:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itistoolate (#0)

Very well done, Mr.Rooke!

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-18   20:57:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Itistoolate (#0)

What's the victory?

Tony Rooke had to pay £200 legal costs and he received a 6 month "conditional discharge."

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see the outcome as a victory for Tony Rooke.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-10-18   21:27:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: scrapper2 (#3)

Most significant in that the court recognized that 9.11 was a staged event, and held the BBC as a complicit actor that day.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-18   21:31:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod, all (#4)

The 'BBC v 9/11 Truth Court Case' - What The Judge Saw...

Itistoolate  posted on  2013-10-18   22:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Itistoolate (#0)

BBC not necessarily complicit. Their stringer may have been a Jew insider who knew the building was to come down and filed a story first to make a few bucks.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2013-10-19   0:25:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Lod (#4) (Edited)

Most significant in that the court recognized that 9.11 was a staged event, and held the BBC as a complicit actor that day.

I didn't get that message from the verdict.

We'd like it to be so. But I don't think the verdict reflected our hopes and wishes.

BBC had no consequences. When one party walks out of a court room unscathed, that usually separates court case winners from losers.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-10-19   1:52:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest