Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ron Paul: The toughest letter I’ve ever had to send
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://12160.info/page/ron-paul-the ... t-letter-i-ve-ever-had-to-send
Published: Apr 12, 2014
Author: staff
Post Date: 2014-04-12 00:58:29 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 162
Comments: 17

This is one of the toughest letters I’ve ever had to send.

For years, people have joked that the three most feared letters in the English language may well be these . . .

I – R – S.

But today, I’m not laughing.

Just days ago, the IRS handed Campaign for Liberty a hefty fine and DEMANDED we turn over sensitive contributor information.

If we don’t comply with the IRS’ outrageous demand for sensitive donor information, I’m afraid we’ll face additional fines that could cripple Campaign for Liberty and perhaps even force us to shut our doors.

But,I’m not naïve. I know where this is headed.

The statists at the IRS know I’ll NEVER EVER turn over confidential information about Campaign for Liberty’s donors without a fight.

Instead, this is likely just the first in a long line of UNCONSTITUTIONAL and likely ILLEGAL “excuses” this rogue government agency will use to try to shut us up and shut us down by FINING us to death.

So I have a decision to make - a critical decision that could affect Campaign for Liberty’s very survival in the months ahead.

Do I fight on? Do I risk everything? Do I tell the statist IRS to go fly a kite?

Or should Campaign for Liberty just pay up, keep our head down, and hope this never happens again?

I need you to tell me what to do today.

In just a second, I’m going to give you a link to a Campaign for Liberty Supporter Ballot.

As you’ll see, there will only be two choices on the form - the only two choices I’m faced with today.

But before you decide, please let me explain everything that’s at stake . . .

As I mentioned, what the IRS wants is contributor information on Campaign for Liberty’s top donors, pointing to a rarely enforced and unconstitutional bureaucratic rule.

You see, as a 501(c)(4) organization under IRS law, all Campaign for Liberty contributor information is supposed to be confidential.

This is a critical protection I wholeheartedly support.

Privacy and liberty go hand-in-hand.

In fact, when Thomas Paine published his pamphlet Common Sense in 1776, he did so anonymously.

Forcing organizations like Campaign for Liberty to publicize donor information would have an incredibly chilling effect on political speech.

Many liberty-loving Americans would silence themselves for fear of becoming targets of political “retribution.”

And after the Obama IRS was caught red-handed targeting pro-limited government groups for harassment and intimidation, these fears could not be more well-founded.

So there’s no way I would ever just hand this kind of information over to these government bureaucrats. That’s not an option.

So when we filed annual reports with the IRS as required by law, we left this information off.

The IRS now claims that’s the reason we’re being fined!

But the truth is, years ago, after the NAACP complied with IRS demands and promptly saw their donor information publicized, the IRS has only occasionally sought to “enforce” their ridiculous rule.

the real reason they’re coming after Campaign for Liberty I’m afraid is something far more sinister.

After all, there’s no denying our Liberty Movement is growing.

Only a few years ago, you and I were barely a “blip” on the political screen.

But there’s no denying things have changed, when you consider:

*** Today, we see a growing crop of new Liberty Movement supporters like Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Ted Cruz (R-TX) in the U.S. Senate;

*** In the U.S. House, there’s Congressmen Justin Amash (R-MI) and Thomas Massie (R-KY).

*** My son, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), is now considered a frontrunner for President in 2016!

*** Audit the Fed is now a top issue in American politics;

*** The bipartisan National Internet Tax Mandate and the National ID database scheme were supposed to sail through Congress, but you and I have so far held them both off;

*** More and more Americans now oppose radical federal government spying programs and - as we saw with Syria - are more skeptical than ever of foreign military adventurism.

Liberty-minded Americans’ efforts are at the heart of all this success.

I’m convinced these are just the beginning stages of a massive nationwide R3VOLUTION that can usher in a new era of liberty and limited government in America.

that’s why we’re being targeted.

That’s why the statists in BOTH parties want so much to shut us up and shut us down.

I’m afraid, without your support today, they could very well get their wish.

I have no doubt if these ridiculous demands made it to court, Campaign for Liberty would win, hands down.

But I’m afraid that’s not what this is about.

Campaign for Liberty is run on a shoestring budget. We don’t have millions lying around in the bank.

This is about draining us.

This is about forcing me to take resources off of other critical programs just to keep our doors open.

That’s why I want so badly to just say “NO!”

But without an IMMEDIATE influx of funds, I’m afraid we’ll be sitting ducks.

I just won’t be able to pay for everything . . .

But the alternative could be worse.

Paying this outrageous extortionist fine - just to exercise our rights as American citizens to petition our government - may even be cheaper in the short run.

But it’ll just embolden an alphabet soup of other federal agencies to come after us.

this is the price you pay for daring to stand up to a federal government that wants to keep taxing, spending, and printing every American into the poorhouse.

So what do I do?

Won’t you please fill out your Campaign for Liberty Supporter Ballot right away?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse (#0)

So what do I do?

Indecisiveness is ugly in a leader.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2014-04-12   1:09:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

Revoke LDS Church 501(c)(3) Status

The church's blatant political support for CA Prop. 8 has opened the door for this campaign.

In the eyes of the govt all tax exempt entities are subject to fickle regulation, and the IRS has long served as a weapon for various enemies lists. ("Wait until we sic the IRS on 'em!"__Richard Nixon)

Ron Paul should correct his first mistake and surrender his tax exempt status. Those who won't donate without receiving a receipt to deduct it from their personal taxes should be written off as tories, not patriots.

Give me a dozen patriots and keep your hundred loyalists, and I'll share with the twelve my ration of matzoh.

If Ron Paul keeps his head down and pays the fine the govt will view that as a confession. And then if Paul doesn't surrender the list he will be set upon with the tyranny of an appointed-for-life-art.-three-judge, who can send Ron Paul to a FCI of the black-robed tyrant's choosing until Paul crumbles or dies from harassment and/or medical neglect. (Yes, this is America. One cannot pay a fine for distilling un-bonded liquor and then continue making whiskey with your carefully concealed still and expect the government's blessing. Paying the fine is just the first step of "getting right with the Master".

If the adverse publicity following the publication of NAACP's heavy donors resulted in the IRS leaving the NGO alone, it didn't constitute a policy change. After Sen. Kennedy and other Northeastern liberals quietly complained in defense of the nig...I mean, America's oldest civil rights organization, the IRS left the big black organ alone. But, who will complain if "wealthy R-W Extremists" such as R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., P.J. O'Rourke, George F. Will, Malcolm Gladwell, Patrick J. Buchanan, etc., are named as "enemies of the world central banks, LLC"?

What well entrenched politician (with a history of "turning the pages", i.e. chicken hawking) or any who are indebted to the imperial bank will stand up for Paul? It's one thing to quietly oppose J. Edgar Hoover (who I'm guessing despised the coordination of black influence) and publicly posture in support of the NAACP. But, what if (shudders) David Duke and Tom Metzger are honored colleagues of the CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY (for European Caucasians)?" Metzger stopped paying taxes in the 1970s, and by 1972 his tax protest over the Vietnam War had destroyed his thriving television business but introduced him to other tax protesters who, he said, were "secular racists, Christian Identity racists, neo-Nazis, all kinds of people."[1]" (wiki)

Now, compare that to the NAACP, "where the leadership was predominantly white and heavily Jewish American. In fact, at its founding, the NAACP had only one African American on its executive board, Du Bois himself. It did not elect a black president until 1975, although executive directors had been African American. The Jewish community contributed greatly to the NAACP's founding and continued financing. Jewish historian Howard Sachar writes in his book A History of Jews in America of how, "In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise."[19] Early Jewish-American co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch and Wise." (wiki)

Any fervent prayers that the same protection of confidentiality enjoyed by the National Association for the Advancement of (Jews first, and perhaps later) Colort Peepul will be extended to Ron Paul (who doesn't turn away donors with diverse political views) will go unanswered by the IRS (the Capuchin Monkey with the tin cup) and the Federal Reserve (the organ grinder and primary beneficiary of the income tax.)

BY THE SUREFIRE'S EERIE LIGHT

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-04-12   2:54:34 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

If the Campaign for Liberty rolls over for the IRS, then Ron Pauls' "legacy" turns into shit.

 photo 001g.gif
“With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group."
-Alex Kurtagic

X-15  posted on  2014-04-12   3:27:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2)

Ron Paul should correct his first mistake and surrender his tax exempt status.

I agree completely. I don't understand why this wouldn't be an option on his mind. I like Ron a lot and almost always agree with his take on stuff, but this is definitely an exception.

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-04-12   4:09:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: X-15, Lod, Phant2000, noone222, Esso, Paulites (#3)

If the Campaign for Liberty rolls over for the IRS, then Ron Pauls' "legacy" turns into shit.

Ron Paul never had a positive legacy to leave.

It is embarrassing to see him as a hanger-on, pan handling for MONEY like a common street hustler.

The Jew media never once panned Paul, during three abortive runs for president. It does not take a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that just perhaps Paul was part and parcel of the effort to elect the first black and communist president of the US.

What major role did Paul play within a four year period??? Paul with the aid of the media took over the role of any conservative American running against Obama...TWICE...

Paul never had any intention of running for president. His job was to get out front, first, corral the conservatives, drop out at the last minute and leave Americans with no voice. At least Perot went all the way once, garnered twenty million votes and scared the hell out of the establishment.

Far too many Americans refuse to admit we were suckered, twice. Jew media never attacked Paul and his son shows up whining at the wailing wall.

Take a look, Paul started out as a term limits conservative, stayed thru eleven terms and the gullible sheep still send him money.

Look at his personal worth statements. First term, a home not much else.

Twenty two years later, his last statement estimated his worth at "in excess of five million". In both runs Paul listed more relatives on his "election campaign" than any other politician, a grand total of over...SIXTY...relatives took our conservative contributions to the bank.

What did we get? Not one to use obscene language, I personally felt I was impregnated without intercourse.

Millions of Paul conservative supporters realized they had been screwed and abandoned ship. Now Paul is walking the streets, pan handling, selling his soul for money.

He just happens to mention that little Rand is running for president, this will evolve in a year with the olde man trying to hustle conservative Americans ONE MORE TIME.

For Gods sake, Americans should view little Rand at the whining wall and see the Jew hand written all over the both of them.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-04-12   4:28:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Pinguinite (#4)

I don't understand why this wouldn't be an option on his mind. I like Ron a lot and almost always agree with his take on stuff, but this is definitely an exception.

He's hanging on long after becoming irrelevant, which reminds me of the great Mae West.

She was an outspoken activist and she taught the English speaking world that women actually enjoyed doing the nasty. They weren't all just performing their wifely duty and "thinking about canning apricots".

But, at age 85 she starred in SEXTETTE (with The WHO's fabulous drummer Keith Moon) and she could only be described as a sad caricature of her younger self.

It was one thing for Congressman Ron Paul to speak out while complying with the rules (written in pencil and subject to change without notice) but now the IRS is testy, treating the former rep the way Clubber Lang treated Apollo Creed, by saying, "You better get that bad look off your face before I knock it off!"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-04-12   5:29:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom (#5)

I personally felt I was impregnated without intercourse.

The last time that happened there was a star in the East.

Hang on while I check.....

Great post by the way.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-04-12   5:38:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#5)

Great Post !

"Resolve to serve no more,” he says, “and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.”

Étienne de La Boétie

noone222  posted on  2014-04-12   6:41:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: noone222, 4 (#8)

from irs.gov -

Donations to Section 501(c)(4) Organizations

Contribu­tions to civic leagues or other section 501(c)(4) organizations generally are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. They may be deductible as trade or business expenses, if ordinary and necessary in the conduct of the taxpayer’s business. How­ever, see Nondeductible Lobbying and Political Expenditures for more information. Also, the organization may be required to disclose that contributions are not deductible when it solicits contributions.

Donations to volunteer fire companies are deductible as charitable contributions on the donor’s federal income tax return, but only if made for exclusively public purposes. Similarly, contributions to certain war veterans organizations are deductible. If the contributions are deductible as charitable contributions, substantiation and disclosure requirements may apply.

++++++++++++++++++++++++

To my knowledge, Paul's organization is not income-tax deductible, but, I could be wrong.

Either way, he should ditch the 501(c)(4) status.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-04-12   10:39:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lod (#9)

Sir Lod...

The interesting question for me, is when will Ron Paul come out as a conservative backing his son for president????

Cynicom  posted on  2014-04-12   11:26:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#10)

We'll have to see if Ron campaigns with Rand, I guess.

Personally, I think that he'd be wise to just sit back and see how it all plays out until someone is finally nominated.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-04-12   11:40:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Cynicom, HOUNDDAWG (#5)

C4L has been one panhandle after another. Notice how proud he is of Ted "Raphael" Cruz.

Deasy  posted on  2014-06-06   9:50:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Deasy, Lod (#12)

C4L has been one panhandle after another. Notice how proud he is of Ted "Raphael" Cruz.

From what I can find, the background of Cruz is Jew ancestry.

Cruz talks the talk only, I wrote him off.

I still maintain, Ron Paul made Obama president.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-06-06   10:06:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Cynicom (#13)

Can't say I prefer McCain over Obama even now, so no downside there.

Deasy  posted on  2014-06-06   11:29:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Deasy (#14)

Can't say I prefer McCain over Obama even now, so no downside there.

I wanted Paul for president, not Obombo or McKook.

Paul talked the talk, twice, then walked out on us, leaving us at the alter.

Result, Obombo or McKooK, we lost either way.

It was like, do you prefer to be shot or hung.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-06-06   11:34:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#15)

It's kind of funny that Ron Paul got redistricted out of a job after keeping it because he didn't want to run for President and lose it.

Deasy  posted on  2014-06-06   11:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Deasy (#16)

Give it some thought.

Had Ron Paul NOT appeared on stage at all, perhaps Obama would not be president. Conservatives stayed home, vote for neither.

I quit with Bush but would have voted one more time for Paul.

He took a hike on us.

At least Perot gave us a choice.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-06-06   12:03:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest