Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ron Paul: The toughest letter I’ve ever had to send
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://12160.info/page/ron-paul-the ... t-letter-i-ve-ever-had-to-send
Published: Apr 12, 2014
Author: staff
Post Date: 2014-04-12 00:58:29 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 183
Comments: 17

This is one of the toughest letters I’ve ever had to send.

For years, people have joked that the three most feared letters in the English language may well be these . . .

I – R – S.

But today, I’m not laughing.

Just days ago, the IRS handed Campaign for Liberty a hefty fine and DEMANDED we turn over sensitive contributor information.

If we don’t comply with the IRS’ outrageous demand for sensitive donor information, I’m afraid we’ll face additional fines that could cripple Campaign for Liberty and perhaps even force us to shut our doors.

But,I’m not naïve. I know where this is headed.

The statists at the IRS know I’ll NEVER EVER turn over confidential information about Campaign for Liberty’s donors without a fight.

Instead, this is likely just the first in a long line of UNCONSTITUTIONAL and likely ILLEGAL “excuses” this rogue government agency will use to try to shut us up and shut us down by FINING us to death.

So I have a decision to make - a critical decision that could affect Campaign for Liberty’s very survival in the months ahead.

Do I fight on? Do I risk everything? Do I tell the statist IRS to go fly a kite?

Or should Campaign for Liberty just pay up, keep our head down, and hope this never happens again?

I need you to tell me what to do today.

In just a second, I’m going to give you a link to a Campaign for Liberty Supporter Ballot.

As you’ll see, there will only be two choices on the form - the only two choices I’m faced with today.

But before you decide, please let me explain everything that’s at stake . . .

As I mentioned, what the IRS wants is contributor information on Campaign for Liberty’s top donors, pointing to a rarely enforced and unconstitutional bureaucratic rule.

You see, as a 501(c)(4) organization under IRS law, all Campaign for Liberty contributor information is supposed to be confidential.

This is a critical protection I wholeheartedly support.

Privacy and liberty go hand-in-hand.

In fact, when Thomas Paine published his pamphlet Common Sense in 1776, he did so anonymously.

Forcing organizations like Campaign for Liberty to publicize donor information would have an incredibly chilling effect on political speech.

Many liberty-loving Americans would silence themselves for fear of becoming targets of political “retribution.”

And after the Obama IRS was caught red-handed targeting pro-limited government groups for harassment and intimidation, these fears could not be more well-founded.

So there’s no way I would ever just hand this kind of information over to these government bureaucrats. That’s not an option.

So when we filed annual reports with the IRS as required by law, we left this information off.

The IRS now claims that’s the reason we’re being fined!

But the truth is, years ago, after the NAACP complied with IRS demands and promptly saw their donor information publicized, the IRS has only occasionally sought to “enforce” their ridiculous rule.

the real reason they’re coming after Campaign for Liberty I’m afraid is something far more sinister.

After all, there’s no denying our Liberty Movement is growing.

Only a few years ago, you and I were barely a “blip” on the political screen.

But there’s no denying things have changed, when you consider:

*** Today, we see a growing crop of new Liberty Movement supporters like Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Ted Cruz (R-TX) in the U.S. Senate;

*** In the U.S. House, there’s Congressmen Justin Amash (R-MI) and Thomas Massie (R-KY).

*** My son, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), is now considered a frontrunner for President in 2016!

*** Audit the Fed is now a top issue in American politics;

*** The bipartisan National Internet Tax Mandate and the National ID database scheme were supposed to sail through Congress, but you and I have so far held them both off;

*** More and more Americans now oppose radical federal government spying programs and - as we saw with Syria - are more skeptical than ever of foreign military adventurism.

Liberty-minded Americans’ efforts are at the heart of all this success.

I’m convinced these are just the beginning stages of a massive nationwide R3VOLUTION that can usher in a new era of liberty and limited government in America.

that’s why we’re being targeted.

That’s why the statists in BOTH parties want so much to shut us up and shut us down.

I’m afraid, without your support today, they could very well get their wish.

I have no doubt if these ridiculous demands made it to court, Campaign for Liberty would win, hands down.

But I’m afraid that’s not what this is about.

Campaign for Liberty is run on a shoestring budget. We don’t have millions lying around in the bank.

This is about draining us.

This is about forcing me to take resources off of other critical programs just to keep our doors open.

That’s why I want so badly to just say “NO!”

But without an IMMEDIATE influx of funds, I’m afraid we’ll be sitting ducks.

I just won’t be able to pay for everything . . .

But the alternative could be worse.

Paying this outrageous extortionist fine - just to exercise our rights as American citizens to petition our government - may even be cheaper in the short run.

But it’ll just embolden an alphabet soup of other federal agencies to come after us.

this is the price you pay for daring to stand up to a federal government that wants to keep taxing, spending, and printing every American into the poorhouse.

So what do I do?

Won’t you please fill out your Campaign for Liberty Supporter Ballot right away?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

Revoke LDS Church 501(c)(3) Status

The church's blatant political support for CA Prop. 8 has opened the door for this campaign.

In the eyes of the govt all tax exempt entities are subject to fickle regulation, and the IRS has long served as a weapon for various enemies lists. ("Wait until we sic the IRS on 'em!"__Richard Nixon)

Ron Paul should correct his first mistake and surrender his tax exempt status. Those who won't donate without receiving a receipt to deduct it from their personal taxes should be written off as tories, not patriots.

Give me a dozen patriots and keep your hundred loyalists, and I'll share with the twelve my ration of matzoh.

If Ron Paul keeps his head down and pays the fine the govt will view that as a confession. And then if Paul doesn't surrender the list he will be set upon with the tyranny of an appointed-for-life-art.-three-judge, who can send Ron Paul to a FCI of the black-robed tyrant's choosing until Paul crumbles or dies from harassment and/or medical neglect. (Yes, this is America. One cannot pay a fine for distilling un-bonded liquor and then continue making whiskey with your carefully concealed still and expect the government's blessing. Paying the fine is just the first step of "getting right with the Master".

If the adverse publicity following the publication of NAACP's heavy donors resulted in the IRS leaving the NGO alone, it didn't constitute a policy change. After Sen. Kennedy and other Northeastern liberals quietly complained in defense of the nig...I mean, America's oldest civil rights organization, the IRS left the big black organ alone. But, who will complain if "wealthy R-W Extremists" such as R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., P.J. O'Rourke, George F. Will, Malcolm Gladwell, Patrick J. Buchanan, etc., are named as "enemies of the world central banks, LLC"?

What well entrenched politician (with a history of "turning the pages", i.e. chicken hawking) or any who are indebted to the imperial bank will stand up for Paul? It's one thing to quietly oppose J. Edgar Hoover (who I'm guessing despised the coordination of black influence) and publicly posture in support of the NAACP. But, what if (shudders) David Duke and Tom Metzger are honored colleagues of the CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY (for European Caucasians)?" Metzger stopped paying taxes in the 1970s, and by 1972 his tax protest over the Vietnam War had destroyed his thriving television business but introduced him to other tax protesters who, he said, were "secular racists, Christian Identity racists, neo-Nazis, all kinds of people."[1]" (wiki)

Now, compare that to the NAACP, "where the leadership was predominantly white and heavily Jewish American. In fact, at its founding, the NAACP had only one African American on its executive board, Du Bois himself. It did not elect a black president until 1975, although executive directors had been African American. The Jewish community contributed greatly to the NAACP's founding and continued financing. Jewish historian Howard Sachar writes in his book A History of Jews in America of how, "In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise."[19] Early Jewish-American co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch and Wise." (wiki)

Any fervent prayers that the same protection of confidentiality enjoyed by the National Association for the Advancement of (Jews first, and perhaps later) Colort Peepul will be extended to Ron Paul (who doesn't turn away donors with diverse political views) will go unanswered by the IRS (the Capuchin Monkey with the tin cup) and the Federal Reserve (the organ grinder and primary beneficiary of the income tax.)

BY THE SUREFIRE'S EERIE LIGHT

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-04-12   2:54:34 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2)

Ron Paul should correct his first mistake and surrender his tax exempt status.

I agree completely. I don't understand why this wouldn't be an option on his mind. I like Ron a lot and almost always agree with his take on stuff, but this is definitely an exception.

Pinguinite  posted on  2014-04-12   4:09:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Pinguinite (#4)

I don't understand why this wouldn't be an option on his mind. I like Ron a lot and almost always agree with his take on stuff, but this is definitely an exception.

He's hanging on long after becoming irrelevant, which reminds me of the great Mae West.

She was an outspoken activist and she taught the English speaking world that women actually enjoyed doing the nasty. They weren't all just performing their wifely duty and "thinking about canning apricots".

But, at age 85 she starred in SEXTETTE (with The WHO's fabulous drummer Keith Moon) and she could only be described as a sad caricature of her younger self.

It was one thing for Congressman Ron Paul to speak out while complying with the rules (written in pencil and subject to change without notice) but now the IRS is testy, treating the former rep the way Clubber Lang treated Apollo Creed, by saying, "You better get that bad look off your face before I knock it off!"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-04-12   5:29:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest