Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Ranchers vs. Regulators: The Clark County Range War
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/04/ ... -grigg/ranchers-vs-regulators/
Published: Apr 18, 2014
Author: William Norman Grigg
Post Date: 2014-04-18 06:20:29 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 34
Comments: 6

Bunkerville, Nevada –

War came to the Western Range that April, a conflict pitting the forces of order and respectability against a restive band of extremists accused of cheating the government of what it was due. The prohibitively stronger side consisted of regulatory agencies allied with powerful non-governmental organizations determined to control the land and expel small private interests who made productive use of it. The unyielding demands of the political elite were met with the unflinching defiance of rural ranchers, leading to talk of a “range war.”

Eventually the ranchers exhausted the patience of the government, which deployed dozens of heavily armed Regulators to the county under orders to put down the rebellion. This would mean arresting – or shooting – anybody who resisted. Rather than submitting, the rebels – with the support of the county sheriff and the aid of several veterans of the most recent war – mobilized to confront the threat. Citizens coalesced into a militia and rode out on horseback to confront the invaders at their staging area.

To the consternation of the government and the respectable media, the rebels held their ground, forcing the Regulators to retreat.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

More excerpts from the article:

“I have certain rights there – range improvements and so forth,” Cliven Bundy told me during an interview near the site of the April 12 standoff.

Although the grazing areas are considered public lands, he continued, “I did have private property there, and there was damage. What the law would do here – they [the Feds] have four Metro [police] officers out there twenty-four hours a day protecting their `property.’ A few days ago, though, I had almost 400 cattle out there [under BLM control] and they didn’t give a damn about that property.”

At least one bull was shot while securely penned, and an unspecified number of other cattle were killed. In addition, Cliven pointed out, “They tore up water lines and cut water tanks in two.”

“The damage is very extensive,” Cliven’s son Ryan told me, holding a complaint he was filing with the Clark County Sheriff’s Office. “There were 200 BLM people out there, and they all had off-road vehicles, in addition to the contract cowboys [hired by the Feds to confiscate the cattle] and they have just tromped this ground. Roads meant nothing to them. First they widened the roads with heavy equipment, and then they didn’t stay on the roads. They would expect a normal person never to overturn a stone, but these guys have just ravished this land.”

In addition to wrecking the range improvements that the Bundy family was legally entitled to make, the BLM Regulators didn’t spare the abode of the incomparably precious desert tortoise, whose preservation was the stated rationale for driving cattle ranching into near-oblivion in Clark County.

“We found several places where their trucks have caved in tortoise dens,” Ryan Bundy told me, his voice laden with weary disgust. “Talk about hypocrisy.”

“Well, it’s not over,” insisted Nevada Senator Harry Reid, who working in concert with his son Rory (a Clark County Commissioner and quondam gubernatorial candidate) and former Reid land-use adviser Neil Kornze (who was approved as BLM director on April 8) has played a central role in the effort to uproot the Bundy family from their land. “We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it.”

“We believe in a country in which we are subject to laws and you can’t just ignore the laws we don’t like,”sniffed Rory Reid.

“This isn’t about protecting turtles – it’s about controlling the land,” declared Red Bear, an Apache Indian from St. George Utah, who told me that he had come to Bunkerville “to stand in defense of freedom.” He described to me how he had been confronted by a BLM official while walking on the range.

“He told me that I had to leave, because I had `no right to be on the property,’” Red Bear said, emitting a disgusted chuckle over the armed functionary’s severe irony deficiency.

“To a Native, that’s a very old story, and it’s the same one we’re seeing here in Bunkerville today. The people behind this are driven by greed and capable of great violence, and it’s happening everywhere in the country. I came here – all of these people came to Bunkerville – to tell the government and the people working with them that it stops here.”

See also: A Tale of the Tortoise and the Sucker - a Water Rights Issue | Farm Wars

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-04-18   18:19:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#1) (Edited)

“I have certain rights there – range improvements and so forth,” Cliven Bundy told me during an interview near the site of the April 12 standoff.

In addition, Cliven pointed out, “They tore up water lines and cut water tanks in two.”

Excerpts from: A Tale of the Tortoise and the Sucker - a Water Rights Issue | Farm Wars

It becomes apparent with even a cursory glance at the background information, that the real issue in Nevada is not an endangered tortoise. It just so happens that the Bundy family holds several vested water rights. Diane Augustine found the following water rights information: [Pic]

I followed up with the State of Nevada and spoke with Melissa Marr. She told me that her department is currently working to convert all vested water rights into a permitted system in which the people who want water must pay for a permit to use it. If a person holding a vested interest does not use it, or sells it, that vested interest is automatically voided and turned into a permitted interest.

In other words, if Bunkerville Bundy does not use his water, he loses it. If the cattle are not on the land, he is not using the water. No cattle, no water usage, and that vested water right held for 100 years or so goes byby. If the BLM succeeds in removing the cattle, the family’s vested water rights will be up for grabs under the new permitted system.

Follow the money…

So, here is a question that begs answering – Is the entire operation against Bunkerville Bundy, the ‘last cattleman standing,’ just another water grab brought to you by the phony environmental movement using an ‘endangered tortoise’ as an excuse to leverage the water rights out from under us and consolidate them into the hands of the government to do with as it pleases?

In a related instance, Klamath Basin, Oregon has lost the majority of its irrigation and livestock water due to another endangered species. Only the critter that is supposedly being protected is not the desert tortoise, it is the sucker fish. Oh yeah, and we can throw in the salmon just for that extra, value added punch.

The feds waited 14 years to implement their plan using a fish as an excuse for the Klamath Basin water takeover and finally wore down the ranchers fighting it. It was a game of ‘wait and litigate’ until the farmers started going broke, couldn’t afford the constant court fees, then an agreement was placed in front of them allowing severely limited water usage, with the threat of ‘either sign it or we will keep you in litigation for years, cut off your livelihood by cutting off all water to your ranches, then take it all.’ And it all started with an endangered fish…

If the BLM succeeds in banishing Bundy’s cattle from the land, then his vested water rights go with them, and the state takes the water. The tortoise has nothing to do with it, just like the sucker fish has nothing to do with the Klamath Basin water crisis.

The tie that binds both Nevada and Oregon together is that phony environmental issues, propagated by the Soros crowd, are being used to rob us of our most valuable resource – water and the right to use it.

Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink…

In Nevada, water belongs to the public and is regulated by the state. What does that mean? It means that every drop of water is owned or operated by the United States or the State of Nevada. Unless you have a vested water right and maintain it, you must apply for a permit to use it.

In the Klamath Basin, Oregon, every drop of water belongs to the tribes, and is regulated by the state.

Consider this – The tribes are a sovereign nation. This equates to having a foreign nation within a nation, with its own separate rules and regulations apart from the law of the land as we know it, sitting right smack dab in the middle of our backyard. And it has control of all Klamath Basin water. And that foreign nation can decide to withhold water at any time. It is not accountable to you or me or anyone that is not a member of the tribes. And it is acting in tandem with the United Nations and the U.S. Federal Government to control all resources and implement Agenda 21.

But these are not the only instances of water and other resource grabs across the nation. Several other areas are experiencing the same types of things, with the following proposal being the coup de gras:

According to congressional budget testimony last week, Waters of the United States would give the EPA authority over streams on private property even when the water beds have been dry, in some cases for hundreds of years.

Edited the link line.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-04-18   18:35:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

A Tale of the Tortoise and the Sucker - a Water Rights Issue | Farm Wars

The feds waited 14 years to implement their plan using a fish as an excuse for the Klamath Basin water takeover and finally wore down the ranchers fighting it. It was a game of ‘wait and litigate’ until the farmers started going broke, couldn’t afford the constant court fees, then an agreement was placed in front of them allowing severely limited water usage, with the threat of ‘either sign it or we will keep you in litigation for years, cut off your livelihood by cutting off all water to your ranches, then take it all.’ And it all started with an endangered fish…

But these are not the only instances of water and other resource grabs across the nation. Several other areas are experiencing the same types of things,

foxnews.com: Colo. eminent domain case settled with $115,000 sale

Breckenridge, Colo. - A contentious eminent domain case in which a local government sought to take private backcountry land for open space has been settled, with the landowners agreeing to a $115,000 sale.

"To me, what just came out of it is, you can't win, you can't fight the government," landowner Ceil Barrie said Wednesday.

She and her husband, Andy, owned ten acres of land perched at 11,000 feet elevation in Breckenridge. The property, with breathtaking views, was a private patch of land surrounded by White River National Forest.

An old, uninhabited day-use cabin, an outhouse and a shuttered gold mine sit on it.

The Barries’ legal troubles began when they worked to access their personal paradise with a utility vehicle. They traveled on an old mining road dating back to the 1880s and said the county did not even know about the road until they made them aware of it.

The county asked to buy the land, but the Barries did not want to part with their piece of "Colorado heaven."

So Summit County condemned it, filed for eminent domain and petitioned for immediate possession.

Summit County, which refused interviews, said in a statement Wednesday it acquired the property for $115,000 in a voluntary settlement, following court- ordered mediation. Ceil Barrie told Fox News the monetary figure just covered the couple’s legal bills and some of the land's value.

She said they had every intention of taking the case to court, but the fight got to be too expensive. "The cabin was condemned on the grounds of plumbing and electricity when it doesn't even have plumbing or electricity,” she said. “All those things added up in my mind... this is ridiculous, we can never win and our money is not unlimited. I have two kids in college this year." The Barries said the slim odds laid out by a mediation judge also influenced them to settle.

"The judge, who was the mediator, basically told us, 'You're fighting Summit County, in the Summit County Courthouse with a Summit County jury and a Summit County judge that has to be re-elected by Summit County voters in November, you're not going to win'," said Ceil Barrie.

According to the county's statement, the deal "...will halt... repeated motorized travel in this region, which includes biologically sensitive public lands designated as non-motorized... The purchase will also put an end to the various commercial activities..."

The landowners said they never went off road and never had plans to build on the property.

They also have a different view on the "commercial activities" cited by the county. Andy Barrie would rake up fallen pine cones for his Christmas wreath business and cart them back to his home in a subdivision below. At one point, they also had the shuttered mine examined for minerals.

Andy Barrie recently held a property rights seminar for landowners. Asked what lessons they shared, Ceil Barrie said with teary eyes, "Yeah, don't annoy the government."

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-04-18   18:45:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ada, 4um (#0)

Hey Harry Reid, you commie d'bag!!

Here's a real domestic terrorist, not to be confused with some rancher grazing his cattle.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2014-04-18   20:30:14 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#0)

What an amazing story from days gone by - thank you for more of our history.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-04-18   20:48:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: All (#3)

Andy Barrie recently held a property rights seminar for landowners. Asked what lessons they shared, Ceil Barrie said with teary eyes, "Yeah, don't annoy the government

Barbarian Pirates.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-04-18   21:50:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest