4um: We Are Your Enemy

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial
See other Editorial Articles
Title: We Are Your Enemy
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 18, 2014
Author: SMITH
Post Date: 2014-04-18 06:22:42 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 460
Comments: 31

We Are Your Enemy

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
There's only one enemy and that's our acceptance of FRAUD. While all fraud is anathema, the fiat banking system is the world's #1 enemy. The central banks are able to fund unlimited evil against the people of the world because they are capable of creating money out of thin air every time they need another tank or bomber to kill us with and the good part is you are paying the freight.
The central bankers own the legislators and have them create laws that protect them against legal action for frauds they commit. The unlimited funds allow for propaganda fueled so-called elections that they own and can rig to their hearts content. And again, you finance their fraud.
Worse yet, whenever you or I participate in any of their fraud we opt out of our constitutional republic and become (Social Security) Card Carrying Members of a socialist democracy.
When we opt out of the Constitutional Republic we leave the protections provided by it and enter the world of contracts. The facts of Constitutional absence are obvious yet most Americans still believe they are protected by it and ignore the massive evidence to the contrary.
All I can say at this point is that if we're incapable of rejecting frauds we are undoubtedly going to suffer the consequences. Anyone that remains loyal to a system that fully intends to destroy us and our country is either too dim to remain free or too fearful to resist the banker bullies that kill women and children for profit while keeping the remaining 7 billion morons under their fiat thumb.

noone222 posted on 2014-04-18 6:47:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#3. To: noone222 (#1)
whenever you or I participate in any of their fraud we opt out of our constitutional republic and become (Social Security) Card Carrying Members of a socialist democracy.
When we opt out of the Constitutional Republic we leave the protections provided by it and enter the world of contracts.

There's no "Opt Out Clause" in the Constitution that I know of, other than canceling citizenship. Contracts aren't exempt from Constitutional Law. Any outside of it are invalid and lawfully unenforceable.

GreyLmist posted on 2014-04-18 16:06:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#5. To: GreyLmist (#3)

Anyone watching this 6 minute video that STILL BELIEVES there's a Constitution in place is a Kool-Aid drinking moron.

noone222 posted on 2014-04-19 11:37:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: noone222 (#5) (Edited)
US House Majority Speaker John Boehner wants to move forward with filing a lawsuit against the President for unlawful unchecked Presidential powers. See here http://www.politico.com/story/20...esident-obama-108298.html

While watching Fox News this morning, there was a speaking panel discussing Boehners move to sue the President. One of the members of Congress actually said something worth noting here. He said that Boehners move to sue would be pointless as Congress should be using their own muscle to enforce the laws but Congress won't do anything because since over 200 years ago, Congress never resumed their sessions to do their job. When I heard this my ears pricked up, because what this Congressman was saying to the people was that, the Constitution was suspended in 1861 by then Abraham Lincoln, who was the first one to draft up a Presidential E.O. which was to suspend the Constitution during which war was present. Because of this E.O., which Lincoln took under advisement by his close advisors (which I believe intentionally had him killed for the purpose of ridding of the Constitution) and Congress never resuming their sessions to re-instate the Constitution, to this very day, all Congressmembers are aware that this constitution is dead to the letter and that is why those like Obama can just do carte blanch E.O. and P.D.D.s without Congressional approval.
We don't live under a democracy (under a republic). This country has been run by mob dictatorship!

purplerose posted on 2014-06-26 15:01:56 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#10. To: purplerose (#8)
Honestly, I'm weary of trying to determine what the law actually is ??? It doesn't matter - people are being screwed royally by a gang of psychos ... so, if they (psychos) don't care to operate lawfully why should we be concerned with the "so-called" law ?

noone222 posted on 2014-06-26 22:12:11 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#11. To: noone222 (#10)
I agree with you on the law being flouted and no solutions — even stern reminders and protests. Someday I would like us to get back to being a nation of laws and not men, so it's worth knowing what was supposed to be. Trying to protect the law with more laws is also a mistake. The NRA's various efforts come to mind.
We need more cynicism, not less.

Deasy posted on 2014-06-26 22:22:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#12. To: Deasy (#11)
I agree with you on the law being flouted and no solutions —

As a friend of mine repeats constantly via e-mail "people are looking for a political solution when the solution is commercial."
Until we reject the current monetary fraud the courts have to rule according to commercial law and the Constitution gathers dust.

noone222 posted on 2014-06-27 7:02:11 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#15. To: noone222, purplerose (#12)
I agree with you on the law being flouted and no solutions —
As a friend of mine repeats constantly via e-mail "people are looking for a political solution when the solution is commercial."
Until we reject the current monetary fraud the courts have to rule according to commercial law and the Constitution gathers dust.

your friend is probably right, "all crime is commercial", but whether they DO have to rule according to commercial law is still playing out. they didn't think anyone would figure it out. they think they are a law until themselves. at any rate, here is the current arena that i haven't heard about on the evening news...
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=167071&Disp=1#C1 - scroll down to:
"... "In a nutshell, you own a trust [actually you are the Beneficiary of the Cestui Que Vie Trust, src-fla.us/index.php/unde...05-recap-of-fraud-bankers / Traficant knows: http://www.apfn.net/doc-100_bankruptcy.htm ]worth Millions of dollars that the government does not tell you about. In the meantime, the bankers and the legal system have been stealing that money from you. "
"THE GREAT AMERICAN ADVENTURE - SECRETS OF AMERICA...." and then continue to #3.

"The Coming Battle" that was written about many years ago is here.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt posted on 2014-06-27 16:53:25 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#16. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#15) (Edited)

your friend is probably right, "all crime is commercial",
"In a nutshell, you own a trust [actually you are the Beneficiary of the Cestui Que Vie Trust,

My friend was a lawyer for years and left the profession because he "finally" got it. The realization made it impossible for him to know the truth and continue to operate within a system of fraud and connivance ... now I want to address a couple of things touched on by you.
(1). While I think there are some truths associated with the "identity" believers religious faith, I am not one of them. I believe the creator has the ultimate authority to make determinations that are outside of my ability. I am a humble-ist
(2). I am of the opinion that one cannot partake in a corrupt system without sharing in the corruption. FRAUD is the evil, to twist that fraud into a benefit is corruption of one's own mind. Whatever the situation might be with respect to certificates of live birth, the creation of trusts, and the negotiable instruments of debt, I am not interested. Those things are fraud from their inception. In my opinion it matters little who benefits from the fraud, them or us. That system is treacherous and makes war on humanity. Fuck it and them.
(3). I am in this world but not of this world. To get embroiled in the redemption fraud is to be blinded by some perceived benefit or to be entangled in their system of courts, agencies, offices and etc.,
Life should be a simple matter that has become so complicated that most people have lost sight of its beauty because they're staring at some form required under the systems fraud.
Having spent 30 years trying to discover the truth as it relates to freedom and life itself I have determined that two words sum up my position with respect to the system and its courts, agencies and offices ... those two words are "fuck you" !

noone222 posted on 2014-06-28 6:11:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#17. To: noone222 (#16)
(2). I am of the opinion that one cannot partake in a corrupt system without sharing in the corruption. FRAUD is the evil, to twist that fraud into a benefit is corruption of one's own mind. Whatever the situation might be with respect to certificates of live birth, the creation of trusts, and the negotiable instruments of debt, I am not interested. Those things are fraud from their inception. In my opinion it matters little who benefits from the fraud, them or us. That system is treacherous and makes war on humanity. Fuck it and them.
(3). I am in this world but not of this world. To get embroiled in the redemption fraud is to be blinded by some perceived benefit or to be entangled in their system of courts, agencies, offices and etc.,

I totally admire your stance. The benefit however is not for us personally, I don't think, except to maybe get us off the treadmill to do what God raised us up to do: preach the gospel and the Kingdom of God [ http://biblehub.com/revelation/5-10.htm ], and to heal a hurting world. [I look on the redemption plan as a type of God's "Moses", calling out, "Let my people, go that they might serve me" : http://biblehub.com/revelation/5-10.htm / Isaiah 24-27, and 1-27: http://biblehub.com/kjv/isaiah/10.htm ] ]. At least that is what I think is meant by God saying to take back their ill-gotten gain and consecrate it to the LORD. God doesn't need our money, and I think one day the world won't either, but in the meantime....
He told the disciples they were given the Kingdom and also that their fruit would remain.
He told the Pharisee ruled Jewish nation that their kingdom was being taken from them and given to another that would bear the fruit thereof, and let no fruit grow on themselves forever.
I believe the nation God was talking about was the only one dedicated with a cross and a charter to spread the gospel, America [ http://www.wnd.com/2007/04/41327/ /Micah 4:1-2, Psalm 2:6]:
The River of Life
1Then he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, 2in the middle of its street. On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. 3There will no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and His bond-servants will serve Him;… http://biblehub.com/revelation/22-2.htm
Until such time as we do away with money completely, the money the elite stole from us can be put into a trust "consecrated to the Lord". [I have read that the CONstitution was a religious trust (and it made perfect sense), and it was not Christian. I believe it was Satan's plan to transfer the Kingdom of God and everything in it to himself (Ezekiel 17:7-10/Matthew 15:13). That's why I think their ill-gotten gain needs to be taken back, LIKE GOD SAID, and transferred back into a trust FOR GOD. I wonder if the First Virginia Charter was a trust. I believe the Monarchy, the Pope, who had a hidden interest, and the "merchants" have forfeited their rights through all their thieving and fraud and oppression, which leaves the Christians who were defrauded of their kingdom to "take back their ill-gotten gain" as God said, and if I am reading it correctly, the Charter itself said! avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/va01.asp ] Money will never heal the hearts of people who lost loved ones to murder by the elite, but it can help to ease physical burdens while they grieve, and open the way for the gospel to be heard.
If we are the second Israel, which I believe we are, we follow a pattern. When the first Israel came out of bondage, they took the gold they escaped with and built a golden calf. The Bible says we will come out of bondage as well, "with much substance, and "consecrate it to the LORD"; those are God's words. Unlike the Israelites, we are not to build golden calves [can be metaphor for whatever we worship; cars, diamonds, "stuff"], but to take back the "stuff" they stole from us and do good with it, and not to leave America out of the healing....
The Year of the Lord's Favor
…3To grant those who mourn in Zion, Giving them a garland instead of ashes, The oil of gladness instead of mourning, The mantle of praise instead of a spirit of fainting. So they will be called oaks of righteousness, The planting of the LORD [ http://www.wnd.com/2007/04/41327/ ; http://biblehub.com/2_samuel/7-10.htm /Ezekiel 34:11-13/Ezekiel 17:1-6, etc], that He may be glorified. 4Then they will rebuild the ancient ruins, They will raise up the former devastations; And they will repair the ruined cities, The desolations of many generations. http://biblehub.com/isaiah/61-4.htm
Years back, I didn't know how this applied to America, but as ghost towns have sprung up over the land, due to the bankster policies to destroy us, it has become increasingly clear. My daughter and I were discussing this the other day. She was watching something called "Detroipia" or something and she was saying how it was not just Detroit, but happening all over the country. It's prophetic. It could also refer to the ruined cities OF THE WORLD. God knows CorpUSA has made enough of them.
Again, I totally admire your stance. You were way ahead of the crowd. But I am trying to understand God's Word, and trying to apply it to the situation at hand. To take this sour lemon and turn it into lemonade the best we can.
I am in this world but not of this world.
I would have to look up "world", but I suspect when used in the Bible like that, it was the same "world" [kosmos, which means constitution, government, order of things] that Jesus used when He said His Kingdom was "not of this world". The reason being He had come to turn their world order upside down and supplant it with HIS NEW World Order. I want to be a part of that, as His servant.

I rather like the method of calling in all the monies associated with the Cestui Que Trust, and then collapsing the trust. That way you take back "their" loot for God, and they can't use it anymore for their nefarious deeds.

===============================
First Charter of Virginia 1606
"....We, greatly commending, and graciously accepting of, their Desires for the Furtherance of so noble a Work, which may, by the Providence of Almighty God, hereafter tend to the Glory of his Divine Majesty, in propagating of Christian Religion to such People, as yet live in Darkness and miserable Ignorance of the true Knowledge and Worship of God, and may in time bring the Infidels and Savages, living in those parts, to human Civility, and to a settled and quiet Government: DO, by these our Letters Patents, graciously accept of, and agree to, their humble and well-intended Desires; ....."

...Provided always, and our Will and Pleasure is, and we do hereby declare to all Christian Kings, Princes, and States, that if any Person or Persons which shall hereafter be of any of the said several Colonies and Plantations, or any other, by his, their, or any of their Licence and Appointment, shall, at any Time or Times hereafter, rob or spoil, by Sea or Land, or do any Act of unjust and unlawful Hostility to any the Subjects of Us, our Heirs, or Successors, or any the Subjects of any King, Prince, Ruler, Governor, or State, being then in League or Amitie with Us, our Heirs, or Successors, and that upon such Injury, or upon just Complaint of such Prince, Ruler, Governor, or State, or their Subjects, We, our Heirs, or Successors, shall make open Proclamation, within any of the Ports of our Realm of England, commodious for that purpose, That the said Person or Persons, having committed any such robbery, or Spoil, shall, within the term to be limited by such Proclamations, make full Restitution or Satisfaction of all such Injuries done, so as the said Princes, or others so complaining, may hold themselves fully satisfied and contented; And, that if the said Person or Persons, having committed such Robery or Spoil, shall not make, or cause to be made Satisfaction accordingly, within such Time so to be limited, That then it shall be lawful to Us, our Heirs, and Successors, to put the said Person or Persons, having committed such Robbery or Spoil, and their Procurers, Abettors, and Comforters, out of our Allegiance and Protection; And that it shall be lawful and free, for all Princes, and others to pursue with hostility the said offenders, and every of them, and their and every of their Procurers, Aiders, abettors, and comforters, in that behalf. ...."
avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/va01.asp

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt posted on 2014-06-28 9:36:53 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#24. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, James Deffenbach, Jethro Tull, purplerose (#17)
Until such time as we do away with money completely, the money the elite stole from us can be put into a trust "consecrated to the Lord".

And, you can't envision the punji stick-lined pits that will await any who attempt to translate "God's Trust account balance" into real world uses for the loot?
And, by what precedent could taxes paid by citizens who are atheists or simply adherents to disagreeable sects of "Judeo-Christianity" be lawfully (constitutionally) dedicated to "proper religious purposes"?
If I decide where the munny is spent and you disagree then you either have veto power (and no consensus will ever be reached) or you don't (which is taxation without representation) as your taxes are spent on religious tasks which you're not allowed to influence or even question.
I suspect that in your ideal nation everyone shares the same beliefs, and that cannot happen without a govt of compulsory political intercourse. And if your people are empowered to disenfranchise those who disagree then that would make them my enemy before the second reading of any such proposal.
My friend James Deffenbach is washed in the blood of the lamb, and perhaps he can explain how such as plan could work.

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2014-06-29 11:51:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#25. To: HOUNDDAWG (#24)
The horns of a dilemma...

Deasy posted on 2014-06-29 11:55:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 25.
There are no replies to Comment # 25.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um