4um: Where's the Conspiro-Nuts?

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Where's the Conspiro-Nuts?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 8, 2014
Author: Turtle
Post Date: 2014-06-08 09:31:15 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 545
Comments: 34

Everything's a conspiracy, you know - three shooters on Kennedy, moon landings of a stage, 9-11 remote-controlled airplanes, fake limbs at the Boston bombings.
So why not a word about Elliot Rodger? Heck, he was the perfect sleeper agent - a brain-washed Chink programmed to kill and strike terror! MK-ULTRA forever!!!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#4. To: Turtle (#0)
So why not a word about Elliot Rodger?

He's as interesting as another flounder in the Fulton Fish Market. They are produced regularly by the psychiatrists to advance the gun-control agenda.

Ada posted on 2014-06-08 10:42:09 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#6. To: Ada (#4)
psychiatrists to advance the gun-control agenda.

My first encounter with a shrink, to see if I was fit for military duty.
Verbatim transcript from memory....
Shrink...Can you drive a tractor?
Me...No.
Shrink...Next.
I was in.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 11:01:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#7. To: Cynicom (#6)
You should have told him you loved tractors and you liked to make patterns in the fields at night when everyone was sleeping. You thought they would signal the people from the stars to come and stop the war.

Deasy posted on 2014-06-08 11:12:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#8. To: Deasy (#7)
The tractor had yet to be invented in Cyni's day. Everything was still horse-powered.

Obnoxicated posted on 2014-06-08 11:27:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#12. To: Obnoxicated (#8)
The tractor had yet to be invented in Cyni's day. Everything was still horse-powered.

Those days are not so remote.
Hitler went to war with Stalin with 3000 tanks and 750,000 horses.

randge posted on 2014-06-08 13:28:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#13. To: randge (#12)
Hitler went to war with Stalin with 3000 tanks and 750,000 horses.

Thats true...
History seldom mentions that Stalin had more tanks and more aircraft than Hitler.
How ever Hitler had the far superior soldier, just not enough of them.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 15:19:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#14. To: Cynicom, randge, 4 (#13)
He should have consulted with Napoleon about the best time of year to invade Mother Russia.

Lod posted on 2014-06-08 15:33:55 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#15. To: Lod (#14)
He should have consulted with Napoleon about the best time of year to invade Mother Russia.

For sure...
In fact his generals were against it from the start. Mostly because of the immensity land wise of Russia.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 15:49:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#16. To: Cynicom (#15)
If only Adolph hadn't opened the African front...his vision exceeded his grasp.

Lod posted on 2014-06-08 16:55:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#17. To: Lod (#16)
If only Adolph hadn't opened the African front...his vision exceeded his grasp.

Now you are getting into geo/politics.
That is something strange to most here.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 17:13:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#18. To: Cynicom (#17)
Versailles backed Germany into such a corner that it wasn't so much geo/politics as it was geo/war. imo

Lod posted on 2014-06-08 17:30:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#20. To: Lod (#18)
Versailles backed Germany into such a corner that it wasn't so much geo/politics as it was geo/war. imo

War is political, always.
Hitler had two motives in Africa.
One to save the Italians from defeat, the other to cross the Suez canal and into the Middle East for Oil.
However his appetite exceeded his manpower and available equipment.
There is where demography comes in. Land war absorbs men and Hitler just did not have them.
As to the future, look at demography of China, billions of people, no longer able to feed themselves, will go somewhere. Question is, whether north or south.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 19:34:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#21. To: Cynicom (#20)
One conventional land front at a time is the best bet, and even then, there's no guarantees.

Lod posted on 2014-06-08 21:03:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#22. To: Lod (#21)
One conventional land front at a time is the best bet, and even then, there's no guarantees.

Sir Lod...
Very true...
Hitler did not plan on nor want the United States to come into the war.
Had we declared neutrality, Hitler would have whipped Russia with ease.
His downfall was signing the pact with Japan.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-08 21:34:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#23. To: Cynicom, randge, Lod (#22)
Based on critical materiel-based trade embargoes begun in 1938, FDR was already interested in war with Japan (and therefore on the side of the communists) by 1940 when the Tripartite agreement was signed. FDR was funding the Chinese and the British in Asia. Few know that Chaing Kai-shek, the "nationalist" Chinese general who eventually fought with Mao, was funded by Stalin for a time. The British put their nose into a war for their very empire when they declared war on Germany over Poland. Americans did not have to volunteer to save "an old bitch, gone in the teeth."
Instead Americans saved the Soviet Union and laid the groundwork for a communist China and the Korean and Vietnamese wars.

Deasy posted on 2014-06-09 0:21:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#24. To: Deasy, 4 (#23)
www.lusitania.net/deadlycargo.htm

Let's continue with the conspiracy that "all our wars were lies" post Civil War.
Here is the manifest of the Lusitania. Wilson was warned not to feed the British war machine, but openly disregarded his public neutral position. As we know the sinking was used to launch us into WWI.

Jethro Tull posted on 2014-06-09 8:51:01 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#25. To: All (#24)
freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=114499

Ten false flag events that changed our world.

Jethro Tull posted on 2014-06-09 8:59:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#26. To: Jethro Tull, Lod, thinkers (#25)
Ten false flag events that changed our world.

Having experienced the long run up to WWII, I can attest that everyone was aware as to what was coming. How it would be triggered off was beyond our mental grasp. For years FDR talked about nothing but AVOIDING war, that should have been a hint that the SOB had plans.
Americans are a trusting lot, so they voted him back into office for a third term, A BAD OMEN.
Now we are gearing up for a war in Asia, most likely China, so are the American people paying attention as we did prior WWII?
No they are not, as only kooks speak of WWIII. Thanks to brainwashing and programming the sheep, the government goes merrily on its way.

Cynicom posted on 2014-06-09 9:18:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#27. To: Cynicom, 4 (#26)
No they are not, as only kooks speak of WWIII. Thanks to brainwashing and programming the sheep, the government goes merrily on its way.

For sure.
There are literally so many bombshell events happening to US on a daily basis (a special thank-you to our whore MSM) that the American people have developed an advanced case of ADD. Their attention span resembles that of a 2-year old. If one scans Drudge on a daily basis my point will be made.

Jethro Tull posted on 2014-06-09 9:30:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#29. To: Jethro Tull (#27)

Itistoolate posted on 2014-06-09 9:42:51 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 29.
There are no replies to Comment # 29.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um