Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Hey here is a "Conspiro-Nut" who won a Court Case Against the BBC
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 19, 2013
Author: Tony Rooke
Post Date: 2014-06-13 12:00:30 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 110

UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one. Spread it far and wide. This is big ifonly symbolic. -Mort

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread