See other World News Articles
Title: War Is Coming
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201 ... war-coming-paul-craig-roberts/
Published: Jul 29, 2014
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2014-07-29 06:49:20 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1087
Comments: 93
The extraordinary propaganda being conducted against Russia by the US and UK governments and Ministries of Propaganda, a.k.a., the “Western media,” have the purpose of driving the world to war that no one can win. European governments need to rouse themselves from insouciance, because Europe will be the first to be vaporized due to the US missile bases that Europe hosts to guarantee its “security.” As reported by Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge, the Russian response to the extra- legal ruling of a corrupt court in the Netherlands, which had no jurisdiction over the case on which it ruled, awarding $50 billion dollars from the Russian government to shareholders of Yukos, a corrupt entity that was looting Russia and evading taxes, is telling. Asked what Russia would do about the ruling, an advisor to President Putin replied, “There is a war coming in Europe.” Do you really think this ruling matters?” The West has ganged up on Russia, because the West is totally corrupt. The wealth of the elites is based not only on looting weaker countries whose leaders can be purchased (read John Perkins’ Confessions of an Economic Hit Man for instruction on how the looting works), but also on looting their own citizens. The American elites excel at looting their fellow citizens and have wiped out most of the US middle class in the new 21st century. In contrast, Russia has emerged from tyranny and from a government based on lies, while the US and UK submerge into tyranny shielded by lies. Western elites desire to loot Russia, a juicy prize, and there stands Putin in the way. The solution is to get rid of him like they got rid of President Yanukovich in Ukraine. The looting elites and the neoconservative hegemonists have the same goal: make Russia a vassal state. This goal unites the Western financial imperialists with the political imperialists. I have recorded for readers the propaganda that is used in order to demonize Putin and Russia. But even I was stunned by the astounding and vicious lies in the UK publication The Economist on July 26. The cover is Putin’s face in a spider web, and, you guessed it, the cover story is “A Web of Lies.” http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21608645-vladimir-putins-epic-deceits- have-grave-consequences-his-people-and-outside-world-web? spc=scode&spv=xm&ah=9d7f7ab945510a56fa6d37c30b6f1709 You need to read this propaganda both in order to see the gutter level of propaganda in the West and the obvious drive to war with Russia. There is no evidence whatsoever in the story to support The Economist’s wild accusations and demand for the end of Western “appeasement” of Russia and the harshest possible action against Putin. The kind of reckless lies and transparent propaganda that comprises The Economist’s story has no other purpose than to drive the world to war. The Western elites and governments are not merely totally corrupt, they are insane. As I have previously written, don’t expect to live much longer. In this video one of Putin’s advisors and Russian journalists speak openly of US plans for a first strike on Russia: http://financearmageddon.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/official-warning-u-s-to-hit- russia-with.html
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-48) not displayed.
.
.
.
#49. To: Deasy (#48)
I have no problem being among the common men :P
Life is what happens to you when you are making other plans.
Of course yhat was wrong, FDR mde a deal with the devil when he buddied-up with "kindly Uncle Joe" Stalin. What, you want me to dig up FDR and slap his corpse around?? That's all that can be done about that at this point. Nixon/FedGov should NEVER have started the process of "normalization and trade" with the Chi-coms, that can be corrected now.
#50. To: Deasy (#45)
Either we have the courage to admit that we were wrong to side with the communists
-Alex Kurtagic
#51. To: Jethro Tull (#49)
You've got me thinking: perhaps there are actually too many undeserving American Boomers. That could explain the current free fall, which is exponentially accelerating.
#52. To: X-15 (#50)
He buddied up with Churchill before that, who was buddied up with the Jews. Carpet bombing and nuking people who were never our enemies to being with, after making such mistakes, is proof that we were seriously making the kinds of mistakes a country probably won't survive. FDR mde a deal with the devil when he buddied-up with "kindly Uncle Joe" Stalin.
#53. To: Deasy (#52)
You can't pin that solely on Churchill, that British nonsense started with Oliver Cromwell and Charles II. Churchill before that, who was buddied up with the Jews
-Alex Kurtagic
#54. To: X-15 (#53)
Agreed. And it's good to keep walking it back. No problem with that at all. Walk it back and forth until our resolve is like high-carbon steel. Without that, there's little hope.
#55. To: Deasy (#51)
Undeserving of what? ...perhaps there are actually too many undeserving American Boomers.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#56. To: Lod (#55)
Life, liberty and property.
#57. To: Deasy (#56)
How very insane.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#58. To: Lod, Jethro Tull (#57)
Why, because your father came back from the war without having to invade Japan and die? If you're alive because of this you can be grateful that fate gave you a chance. But what about the unborn children who died, boiling in their mothers' wombs because we entered a war we shouldn't have and "had to win as fast as possible?" How very insane.
#59. To: Deasy, 4 (#58)
Hindsight being 20/20, it's a shame we didn't know then what we know now, eh? But what about the unborn children who died, boiling in their mothers' wombs because we entered a war we shouldn't have and "had to win as fast as possible?"
Life is what happens to you when you are making other plans.
#60. To: Jethro Tull, Lod (#59)
Many knew but the commoners, beguiled by superstition and threatened by fates worse than death, in other words die untermensch, just couldn't see it. Were their children worthy of national survival? I think not. If there's an afterlife, the souls of those naive American troops who died on the beaches of Anzio and Normandy must be completely disgusted with Americans today. The founding fathers had contempt for those who could be enslaved. Implicit in the Declaration was a definition of man as one who would die rather than live in chains. So much for us.
#61. To: Deasy (#60)
OK
Life is what happens to you when you are making other plans.
#62. To: Deasy (#22)
Cyni gave you good advice.
A rainbow coalition against Jews doesn't require Whites or Pro-Whites. It can be just as brown or anti-white as you like.
#63. To: Deasy (#41)
I think rather US participation in the world wars was a symptom of US collapse. The world wars themselves were symptoms of broader white collapse. The lands of white folk have been running on fumes and borrowed time ever since. Old-timey radio well before Dec 7 1941 is full of public service announcements warning Americans not to discriminate on the basis of religion and national origin. But the Jew media couldn't swing an admonishment on race -- yet. We can look at the results and see that defeating the Axis brought our own collapse.
A rainbow coalition against Jews doesn't require Whites or Pro-Whites. It can be just as brown or anti-white as you like.
#64. To: Deasy (#41)
Remember to adjust for local and world population size. more civilian casualties than ever before
A rainbow coalition against Jews doesn't require Whites or Pro-Whites. It can be just as brown or anti-white as you like.
#65. To: Prefrontal Vortex, Lod, Jethro Tull, X-15, christine (#63) (Edited)
The two perspectives aren't exclusive. Once we shed victorious blood for the antifascist cause it became like an inner territory that we would continue to defend "forever." Europe would be European today, not half-Islamic. America would have continued to be neutral, and it would have proudly regulated its immigration. Not only that but our forces would have been invincible. There would have been time to develop nuclear weapons and missile guidance systems at our own pace. America's entry into WWII, and the British gamble that we would, was the biggest blow to Europeans in the history of the world. People who can't see this are doomed to continue shedding European American blood when there isn't much left. We don't have time to waste on the lies. I think rather US participation in the world wars was a symptom of US collapse.
The world wars themselves were symptoms of broader white collapse.
Only after the western Allies guaranteed Soviet victory in the east. Without a British declaration of war on Germany after the race to Danzig, the entire western front could have been avoided. This was the pivotal moment in Germany's rise. I have no doubt that Germany would have won in Eastern Europe if America hadn't interfered. With Stalin's first-strike capability and intent, the Non-Aggression Pact would have collapsed eventually.
#66. To: Deasy, 4 (#65)
There was no British gamble that America would enter WWII. With the benefit of hindsight it's clear that there was collusion between FDR and Churchill prior to our entry. America's entry into WWII, and the British gamble that we would, was the biggest blow to Europeans in the history of the world.
Life is what happens to you when you are making other plans.
#67. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#62)
I'm not here to make friends. Cyni gave you good advice.
#68. To: Jethro Tull (#66)
There is evidence that British intelligence told Churchill about the upcoming Jap attack on Pearl Harbor. Seems like that whole deal was only a "surprise attack" to the American people, everybody else knew about it.....
-Alex Kurtagic
#69. To: X-15 (#68)
X- From dim memory. If you look you will find some of Brits were playing footsie with Japs same as Russia was doing with Germany in the 1930s. In particular was a Navy Commander, cannot recall his name, that was passing information to the Japs. He was advising them how to properly set the depth of their aircraft launched torpedos and such. Japs were new at aircraft carrier business, he was their man in London. There is evidence that British intelligence told Churchill about the upcoming Jap attack on Pearl Harbor.
#70. To: Deasy (#67)
Yes, perhaps not. I'd assume that you're here to persuade or make an argument, which is great because that's largely what this is all about. "You" (along with its related pronouns) is a dangerous word in argument as it may be provocative, is often insinuating, and sometimes unintentionally predicates things which are untrue about the reader. I've found that it's best to stay away from the second person when crossing swords. It helps maintain the focus on the argument and off the personalities. I'm not here to make friends.
"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan
#71. To: Jethro Tull, *antifa* (#59) (Edited)
At the very least we should all agree that the Nuremberg trials were a hypocritical sham after widespread British and American deployment of saturation bombing with napalm-loaded incendiaries over densely populated areas, and then the first ever use of nuclear weapons against non-combatants. Also the Nuremberg trials assert that initiating warfare against one's enemies in a preemptive strike is a crime against humanity. It's OK to provoke a declaration of war with economic and low-intensity violence but it's not OK to attack enemies who have first strike plans against you preemptively. Bush and everyone in congress who voted for the attack on Iraq in 2003 would therefore be war criminals. Hindsight being 20/20, it's a shame we didn't know then what we know now, eh?
#72. To: X-15 (#68)
X... This the Brit that sold everything to the Japanese up to Pearl Harbor... av8rblog.wordpress.com/20...-pioneer-spied-for-japan/ Brit intelligence knew about him and what he was doing.
#73. To: randge, christine (#70) (Edited)
If any of my challenges are unwarranted, please let me know. Find any that are factually wrong as per all that we know as a forum, or otherwise rhetorically invalid and I will apologize or if I didn't intend the error, I will post a correction. There is a time and a place to use a rhetorical whip. After a war starts with the justification of warmongers quipping vague and unsubstantiated attacks and unprovable recollections of history, it's usually too late to hit them hard where it counts. A time of peace is the best time to work against war — before it's too late. Meantime, i will show no mercy to the enemies of peace. I'd assume that you're here to persuade or make an argument, which is great because that's largely what this is all about.
#74. To: Cynicom (#69)
I have another book on a completely different topic that details that the U.S. Navy deciphered encrypted Japanese naval communications back around 1925 and kept up with it from that point forward through the duration of the war. That ongoing intelligence enabled the USAAF to shoot down Admiral Yamamoto when he was visiting a forward combat area in the Pacific. There was never a gap in time when the U.S. Navy was not able to decipher the Japanese naval messages.
-Alex Kurtagic
#75. To: X-15 (#74)
Reinhard Gehlen the master of all. He and his people used brain power and common sense. Gehlen was the CIA in Germany for a long time. He and his people were NOT spies nor operatives. Power of deduction fueled by bits and pieces of free information.
#76. To: Deasy (#73)
It is. At least it was when we were in a time of peace. We've been on the road to war for the last dozen years or so, and the crimes that put us on this path are too actionable and too grave for them to be brought to light. The War Party is in no position to retreat, and while I would like to see truth and reconciliation at a minimum, that is unlikely to happen in this country hypnotized as it is with foopball and the electronic circus. The socialists have been given the baton temporarily so that they can attempt to institute their own brand of bumbling dirigism, but their clock is running out. The real shitkickers will be back in the driver's seat in the next election and the game will be on. And no, I don't think your challenges are unwarranted. On the contrary, I think you're entirely asking the right questions. There are a lot of people asking the right questions right now. I just think we've run out of time for that. Peace. A time of peace is the best time to work against war — before it's too late. Meantime, i will show no mercy to the enemies of peace.
"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan
#77. To: randge (#76)
well said. I agree with your assessment completely but particularly this~ The socialists have been given the baton temporarily so that they can attempt to institute their own brand of bumbling dirigism, but their clock is running out. The real shitkickers will be back in the driver's seat in the next election and the game will be on. The dems have their 8 yrs of welfare expansion and then the repubs have their 8 yrs of warfare expansion...and the beat goes on..and on...and on.
To question is to value the ideal of truth more highly than the loyalties to nation, religion, race, or ideology.
#78. To: Jethro Tull (#39)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson
#79. To: ghostdogtxn (#78)
Bullshit, you've got more than "Heh" to say!!!! :)
-Alex Kurtagic
#80. To: ghostdogtxn (#78)
He lives! :P
#81. To: Jethro Tull (#80)
Prolly getting ready to move north.
#82. To: Cynicom (#81)
Or he has learned conversational Spanish.
#83. To: Jethro Tull (#82)
We barely avoided 10,000 of them here. Among scum elected politicians in Washington, not one will stand up, denounce the government, resign and walk the hell away. None of them have any principles. Their lust for power and position is so great, they are willing to allow our country to be overwhelmed with human debris.
#84. To: X-15 (#79)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson
#85. To: Cynicom (#83)
The political fucks are calling it a "crisis." It's a scam bring run on them by a street agitator and they are either falling for it, or more likely part of the scam. For sure not one of these country clubbers know the ghetto and the street shams that are part of the scenery. The publik remains stuck in a world of double digit IQ entertainment. Among scum elected politicians in Washington, not one will stand up, denounce the government, resign and walk the hell away.
#86. To: Jethro Tull (#85)
There is a vital need for at least one fire eating, rabble rousing, person to be "erected" in Congress. Instead all we get is yellow bellied, sap sucking feather merchants.
#87. To: Cynicom (#86)
Trey Gowdy does a decent job kicking over the traces.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#88. To: Lod (#87)
True... I wonder if he is a whining wall, beanie grubber? Trey Gowdy does a decent job kicking over the traces.
#89. To: Cynicom (#88)
I need to research more on that front; praying that he's not one of "them."
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
.
.
.
Comments (90 - 93) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest