#7. To: christine, kawika, titorite, Fred Mertz (#1)(Edited)
This mainly focused on the WTC7 collapse which I thought was well-understood as having been "pulled," as per its owner. Evidently that's still not widely nor officially recognized. Big, big insurance crime looks like to me. And to set that up in advance would have been quite a feat, not something to do on the day of the main towers' incident.
Here he gets to some interesting criticism of the official (NIST?) analysis of the north WTC tower's collapse: they say the pancaking of an upper block of the building brought it down, but video evidence shows that it basically flaked apart and went into free fall.
He moves on to talk about explosions that were heard at the ground level.
I think the planes were CGI mixed with real explosions. No planes. Aluminum can not cut steel under any circumstance not ever.
T: The sides of the building were lightly reinforced aluminum and would have been easy for a plane to enter. Your CGI theory is pretty complicated. A lot of people saw the planes, which didn't have to be flying at 500mph to reach their destinations. Also, we do not know who was piloting the aircraft or their talents. There's been a lot of conjecture that is impossible to prove or disprove. We should all be wary about those things and stick to the known facts, which at this point are many but still murky in important places.
Another interesting item (I'm sure the rest of you know) is that the engineers determined that particles of nanothermite were found at the site (along with?) other substances that they believe were manufactured by advanced defense contractors and only available to the military.
What I liked best about this clip was the analytical nature of the dialog, and the fact that it was on C-SPAN live without apparent censorship.