titorite, please lay out the points that you don't agree with. We understand that many of the concepts are difficult to grasp. Most can be explained in layman's terms.
I think the planes were CGI mixed with real explosions. No planes.
Aluminum can not cut steel under any circumstance not ever. The effect can not be reproduced because it is not physically possible.
ALSO commercial planes can't fly at 500 MPH in low altitudes for very long due to the denser atmosphere. Too much friction, too much wind drag. Also the cell phone calls from the planes back then would of been impossible.
Fake holes were blown out to look like the shapes but it is an imprecise art and the perpatrators tried to hard to get it perfect. Collision physics is never perfect. The wings would of sheared off to the columns and not gone through them ... The massive steel columns would of withstood that...
Thats my point of contention...
Nano thermite might of been used to cut out the fake holes. I am not in much contention about that.
And thank you for asking me. This thread deserves more attention for the mainstream of it. C-span.... Do so few of us really care that it is OK for Gage to be on C-span? Has this event become so irrelevant to too many?.... IDK.... But I am glad you acknowledged it too.
I think the planes were CGI mixed with real explosions. No planes.
CGI makes little sense to me because 1) how do you make it look real when it is being viewed from many different angles, elevations (Ie helicopters)? 2) how do you get different sounds to match? 3) how do you get a CGI to make the tower (WTC2) sway, noticeable to cameras? 4) how do you get explosions to blow steel exterior columns INWARD? and set them accurately to match the way the CGI arrived at the actual building. Please think about these issues carefully.
Aluminum can not cut steel under any circumstance not ever. The effect can not be reproduced because it is not physically possible.
Hold on. The majority of the facade was glass. 14" of steel w/aluminum covering, 18" glass, 14" of steel, etc, etc. The plane was shredded and entered through the glass openings. If you study the damage maps you'll see that few columns were sliced, but bent in where the butt connections were located. or the entire panel was broken free by the engines. Just because the facade was discolored doesn't mean the steel columns were severed by aluminum wings.
ALSO commercial planes can't fly at 500 MPH in low altitudes for very long due to the denser atmosphere. Too much friction, too much wind drag.
The radar proved that the "UA175" vehicle was doing over the max operating speed. Pilots for 911 Truth are the experts on this. High speed suggests a modified airframe that could sustain the speeds at sea level. It doesn't mean CGI was the mechanism.
Also the cell phone calls from the planes back then would of been impossible.
Agreed
Fake holes were blown out to look like the shapes but it is an imprecise art and the perpatrators tried to hard to get it perfect. Collision physics is never perfect. The wings would of sheared off to the columns and not gone through them ... The massive steel columns would of withstood that...
see above
Thats my point of contention...
Nano thermite might of been used to cut out the fake holes. I am not in much contention about that.
Too difficult to get charges to match where the plane went in. A slight error 1/2 mile out would throw everything off, if the plane could even hit the building. Check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEQtxTnDusk
It was a real plane and the placed charges, whatever they were, did the controlled demolition. This had to be high tech because of the nature of the found nanothermite. Only a few military labs can produce it.
Consider this. If you were running this op, would you risk human error using a real hijacker? How could you be sure he didn't chicken out at the last moment or screw the trajectory up? For me the op screams remote control. Probably pre-programmed computer control to remove any possibility of not delivering the jet to the intended target.