Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Women As Reproductive Bottlenecks
Source: UncleBob's Treehouse
URL Source: http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2014/08 ... -reproductive-bottlenecks.html
Published: Aug 21, 2014
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2014-08-21 16:03:58 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 248
Comments: 11

My neighbor across the street breeds bulldogs, and the female recently gave birth to six puppies. The father had been dead five years, but his sperm had been frozen. God knows how many puppies he's fathered.

That got me thinking about women as reproductive bottlenecks. A woman can perhaps have 15 babies in her life (my father's mother had nine), but a man can impregnate thousands of women.

I don't consider this bottleneck a good thing. For one thing, r-selected retards can outbreed us K-selected smartyguys.

Society got around this in the past by killing the more criminal r-selected (yay for one less Michael Brown!) and also parents had a say to whom their kids married, to make sure they didn't end up with male or female Michael Browns.

No matter, that bottleneck has caused horrendous problems. Let's put it this way: great men such as Adam Smith and Isaac Newton never reproduced. But as for the retarded (think Idiocracy), the world is being flooded with them.

I used to read a lot of science fiction in my early teens, not because it make me imaginative, but because I was imaginative and thus drawn to it. But I remember reading Brave New World and the babies in test tubes (try the TV series, Space: Above and Beyond for vat-grown babies).

Right now human sperm and eggs are being frozen, and then sometimes implanted in surrogate mothers.

It's a way beyond that bottleneck.

What's next? Artificial wombs? It's coming. You know it is.

What will this do to the value of women? Their value sexually is close to zero, at least for men who can get women. If men can get designer babies grown in artificial wombs, with the eggs of whatever woman they choose (and I'm sure those special eggs would cost a lot of money), then who needs the average woman?

Sex cheap, the bottleneck bypassed, making women's reproductive value cheap...the only thing left that makes women worthwhile is love. And what is to be done with that?

Brave New World, indeed.


Poster Comment:

I've met people who think this is a good thing so we can create designer babies. It'd be a lot easier if all women wanted to have sex with Turtle and then Turtle's descendents could take over the world.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#9. To: Turtle (#0) (Edited)

In view of the horrors frankly chronicled here elsewhere and the remnant of other totally honest sites, I really hope this catches on -- and soon:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement

Of course it doesn't have a chance in hell of doing so, because of the romantic notion that everybody and every society has a divinely-ordained, starry-eyed right to the terrifically vanity-enhancing process of reproduction. The evil effects of technocracy have brought the more advanced nations to the brink of either extinction or (yes) a Brave New World, and I don't know what hope we can look for with those two options.

This is not a joke -- and the VHEM's FAQ are brilliant!

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2014-08-21   17:42:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: NeoconsNailed (#9)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement

Gotta be white folk.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2014-08-21   18:22:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

        There are no replies to Comment # 10.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest