Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Congress Proposes Law Banning Body Armor In The Land Of The Free
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014- ... w-banning-body-armor-land-free
Published: Aug 21, 2014
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2014-08-21 21:32:26 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 64
Comments: 10

By the late 1920s, Joseph Stalin became the unchallenged leader of the Soviet Union after having eliminated his opposition.

He topped it off in 1929 by serving a decisive blow to anyone that would dare to oppose him by outlawing private gun ownership in the country.

From that year on until 1953 when Stalin died, it’s estimated that more than 20 million Soviet citizens that were seen as a threat to the country’s leadership.

People were rounded up and either murdered outright, or sent to infamous gulag labor camps.

Stalin is an extreme case. But history is ripe with examples of governments which disarm their citizens, only to engage in serious oppression afterwards.

Communist China. Nazi Germany. Cambodia. Guatemala. Uganda. The list goes on and on. Pacification of the citizens is almost always a prerequisite to totalitarianism.

There have been a lot of attempts to disarm, or at least partially disarm, people in the US throughout history as well.

Each time there’s a major shooting somewhere, the chant to ban firearms grows louder.

But the latest proposal is especially telling.

H.R. 5344 is a bill currently going through Congress that would ban the purchase of body armor.

Violation would carry CRIMINAL penalties, including up to ten years in prison.

Many bullet-resistant items on the market now, such as bulletproof backpacks for school children, would be banned by this legislation.

This is incredible given that the legislation is all about banning something that is purely defensive.

Whatever your stance on firearms, I hope we can agree that it’s pretty damn difficult to hurt another human being with body armor.

People buy body armor for protection. That’s the point. Duh.

So why in the world would they want to ban it?

The government claims that “criminals and rampaging madmen” can “wreak havoc” while wearing body armor, and it’s important to shield police from these nefarious individuals.

Uh, wait a sec– you mean the same police that go around terrorizing ordinary citizens who aren’t breaking any laws whatsoever?

The same police who beat homeless people to death?

The same police who shoot and kill innocent animals in broad daylight in the middle of the street?

The same police who scream “I will f***ing kill you!” with their weapons trained on crowds of protestors exercising their constitutional rights?

Right. Those guys.

This is such a disgusting, yet unfortunately predictable, turn of events in the Land of the Free.

It’s enraging. It’s infuriating. And it’s so obvious: the country has become a giant police state. And the trend is not getting any better.

It’s time to set aside emotion. It’s time to set aside a lifetime of propaganda and programming telling you that you live in a free country.

It’s time to look at the objective evidence all around you.

They spy. They steal. They wage illegal wars. They authorize military detention of civilians. They assassinate citizens.

They intimidate. They terrorize. They torture. They suspend due process when it suits. They destroy anyone who challenges them.

And now they want to take away a non-violent means of protecting yourself.

This is our reality. And at a minimum, it’s time for rational, thinking people to come up with a Plan B. What’s yours?


Poster Comment:

This proposed by a Mexican American congressman from San Jose California. He does not want homeowners to have guns of body armor when da Gangsta do a home invasion against those racist whites.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse (#0)

www.infidelbodyarmor.com - check it out, get it while you can.

These fuckers want us dead.

Pardon the honesty.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-08-21   21:37:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lod (#1)

This bill won't pass.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2014-08-21   23:26:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Horse (#0)

Body armor sales will sky rocket !

"This place called earth is hell (though it could be heaven).” Those that haven't noticed are without a soul to be redeemed.

noone222

noone222  posted on  2014-08-22   7:31:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod, 4 (#1)

Excellent link Lod, thanks.

"Pants Up, Don’t Loot"

Jethro Tull  posted on  2014-08-22   7:41:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod (#1)

Last One Alive ... fuck the fuckers !

"This place called earth is hell (though it could be heaven).” Those that haven't noticed are without a soul to be redeemed.

noone222

noone222  posted on  2014-08-22   8:05:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Horse, Lod, Jethro Tull (#0)

Used to be Tories were tarred and feathered, sometimes with tar poured down their traitorous gullets.

Deasy  posted on  2014-08-22   8:42:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deasy (#6)

Used to be Tories were tarred and feathered, sometimes with tar poured down their traitorous gullets.

I've read about that...ugh.

The phrase for the day is, "undocumented shoppers."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2014-08-22   8:55:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Horse (#0)

the legislation is all about banning something that is purely defensive.

Whatever your stance on firearms, I hope we can agree that it’s pretty damn difficult to hurt another human being with body armor.

People buy body armor for protection. That’s the point. Duh.

now they want to take away a non-violent means of protecting yourself.

This is our reality. And at a minimum, it’s time for rational, thinking people to come up with a Plan B. What’s yours?

The Romans reportedly made Kevlar-like body armor simply by gluing 7-12 layers of linen together, optionally reinforced with a layer of leather:

Watch Ancient Impossible Full Episodes & Videos Online - HISTORY.com

Warrior Tech - 43 mins.

Ultimate Weapons - 44 mins.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-09-11   2:20:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Horse, Jethro Tull (#0)

This proposed by a Mexican American congressman from San Jose California. He does not want homeowners to have guns of body armor when da Gangsta do a home invasion against those racist whites.

I agree.

I bought Level II from Safariland when I was in CA in 1980. Later I went to the factory in Monrovia and had it upgraded free of charge. (It was a warranty repair of a leak in the moisture cover and the tech stuffed in more Kevlar as a PR gesture.)

But, year round it was so hot that I hated wearing it. In fact, I can't help but wonder if that's why so many cops are trigger itchy hostiles these days.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-09-11   3:25:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lod (#1) (Edited)

These fuckers want us dead.

Pardon the honesty.

Once congress has regulated every external "danger" what will they do then?

I'm reminded of the SOUTH PARK episode where govt agents climb ladders and peek through windows to make certain that folks are wearing their toilet seat belts, and ticket those who aren't.

reverse cowgirl

CARTMAN: "Toilet time is the last bastion of American Freedom!"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-09-11   3:37:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest