Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Ferguson: No Justice in the American Police State
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201 ... lice-state-paul-craig-roberts/
Published: Aug 22, 2014
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2014-08-22 07:07:51 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 73
Comments: 9

There are reports that American police kill 500 or more Americans every year. Few of these murdered Americans posed a threat to police.

https://www.dojmedia.com/u-s-police-have-killed-over-5000-civilians-since-911/ Police murder Americans for totally implausible reasons. For example, a few days before Michael Brown was gunned down in Ferguson, John Crawford picked up a toy gun from a WalMart shelf in the toy department and was shot and killed on the spot by police goons. www.msnbc.com/msnbc/family-man-killed-cops-walmart- demands-surveillance-video

It appears that the murder of Michael Brown did not satisfy the blood lust of the goon thug cop murderers. Less than four miles from Ferguson, goon thugs murdered another black man on August 19. The police claims of “threat” are disproved by the video of the murder. www.huffingtonpost.com/20...l- shooting_n_5696546.html You can see the entire scene much better here. This is a clear case of outright murder of a man by our Nazi Gestapo police. thefreethoughtproject.com...es-refutes-st-louis-cops- version-shooting/ The police then handcuff their dead victim.

Clearly, the American police are an enormous danger to the public. It will be interesting to see what excuses the police shills will come up with to justify this murder. It is not American civilians with carry permits who murder 500 people a year. It is the goon thug police. Gun control should be applied to the police who lack sufficient intelligence and judgment to go around armed.

Five hundred is more than one killing by police per day. Yet the reports of the shootings seldom get beyond the local news. Why then has the Ferguson, Missouri, police killing of Michael Brown gone international?

Probably the answer is the large multi-day protests of the black community in Ferguson that led to the state police being sent to Ferguson and now the National Guard. Also, domestic police in full military combat gear with armored personnel carriers and tanks pointing numerous rifles in the faces of unarmed civilians and arresting and threatening journalists make good video copy. The “land of the free” looks like a Gestapo Nazi state. To much of the world, which has grown to hate American bullying, the bullying of Americans by their own police is poetic justice.

For those who have long protested racial profiling and police brutality toward racial minorities, the police murder of Michael Brown in Ferguson is just another in a history of racists murders. www.counterpunch.org/2014...n-and-the-murder-of-mike- brown/print Rob Urie is correct that blacks receive disproportionate punishment from the white criminal justice (sic) system. See, for example: www.lewrockwell.com/2014/...gg/mother-faces-11-years- in-prison/

Myself, former US Representative Dennis Kucinich, and others see Michael Brown’s murder as reflective of the militarization of the police and police training that creates a hostile police attitude toward the public. The police are taught to view the public as threats against whom the use of violence is the safest course for the police officers.

This doesn’t mean that racism is not also involved. Polls show that a majority of white Americans are content with the police justification for the killing. Police apologists are flooding the Internet with arguments against those of the opposite persuasion. Only those who regard the police excuse as unconvincing are accused of jumping to conclusions before the jury’s verdict is in. Those who jump to conclusions favorable to the police are regarded as proper Americans.

What I address in this article is non-evidential considerations that determine a jury’s verdict and the incompetence of Ferguson’s government that caused the riots and looting.

Unless the US Department of Justice makes Michael Brown’s killing a federal case, the black community in Ferguson is powerless to prevent a cover-up.

What usually happens in these cases is that the police concoct a story protective of the police officer(s) and the prosecutor does not bring an indictment. As Obama and his Attorney General, Eric Holder, are partially black (in skin color alone), the black majority community in Ferguson, Missouri, might have hopes from Holder’s visit. However, nothing could be more clear than the fact that Obama and Holder, along with the rest of “black leadership,” have been co-opted by the white power structure. How else would Obama and Holder be in office? Do you think that the white power structure puts in office people who want justice for minorities or for anyone other than the mega-rich?

The 1960s were a time of black leadership, but that leadership was assassinated (Martin Luther King) or co-opted. Black leaders sold out for prestige appointments and corporate board memberships. Today black leadership is marginalized and exists only at local levels if at all.

If the cop who killed Brown is indicted and he is tried in Ferguson, the jury will contain whites who live in Ferguson. Unless there is a huge change in white sentiment about the killing, no white juror can vote to convict the white cop and continue to live in Ferguson. The hostility of the white community toward white jurors who took the side of a “black hoodlum who stole cigars” against the white police officer would make life for the jurors impossible in Ferguson.

The trouble with purely racial explanations of police using excessive force is that cops don’t limit their excesses to racial minorities. White people suffer them also. Remember the recent case of Cecily McMillan, an Occupy protester who was brutalized by a white goon thug with a record of using excessive force. McMillan is a young white woman. Her breasts were seized from behind, and when she swung around her elbow reflexively and instinctively came up and hit the goon thug. She was arrested for assaulting a police officer and sentenced by a jury to a term in jail. The prosecutor and judge made certain that no evidence could be presented in her defense. Medical evidence of the bruises on her breast and the police officer’s record of police brutality were not allowed as evidence in her show trial, the purpose of which was to intimidate Occupy protesters.

In America white jurors are usually sheep who do whatever the prosecutor wants. As Cecily McMillan, a white woman, could not get justice, it is even less likely that the black family of Michael Brown will. Those who are awaiting a jury’s verdict to decide Michael Brown’s case are awaiting a cover-up and the complicity of the US criminal justice (sic) system in murder.

If there is a federal indictment of the police officer, and the trial is held in a distant jurisdiction, there is a better chance that a jury would consider the facts. But even these precautions would not eliminate the racist element in white jurors’ decisions.

The situation in Ferguson was so badly handled it almost seems like the police state, in responding to the shooting, intended to provoke violence so that the American public could become accustomed to military force being applied to unarmed civilian protests.

Ferguson brings to mind the Boston Marathon Bombing. Two brothers of foreign extraction allegedly set off a “pressure cooker bomb” left in a backback that killed and injured race participants or observers. The two brothers were deemed, without any evidence, to be so dangerous that the entirety of Boston and its suburbs were “locked down” while 10,000 heavily armed police and military patrolled the streets in military vehicles conducting door-to-door searches forcing residents from their homes at gun point, while the police ransacked homes where it was totally obvious the brothers were not hiding. Not a single family evicted from their residences at gunpoint said: “Thank God you are here. The bombers are hiding in our home.”

The excessive display of force and warrantless police home intrusions is the reason that aware and thoughtful Americans do not believe one word of the official account of the Boston Marathon Bombing. Thoughtful people wonder why every American does not see the bombing as an orchestrated state act of terror in order to accustom Americans to the lock-down of a city and police intrusion into their homes. Logistically, it is impossible to assemble 10,000 armed troops so quickly. The obvious indication is that the readiness of the troops indicates pre-planning.

In Ferguson all that was needed to prevent mass protests and looting was for the police chief, mayor or governor to immediately announce that there would be a full investigation by a civic committee independent of the police and that the black community should select the members it wished to serve on the investigative committee.

Instead, the name of the cop who killed Michael Brown was withheld for days, a video allegedly of Michael Brown taking cigars from a store was released as a justification for his murder by police. These responses and a variety of other stupid police and government responses convinced the black community, which already knew in its bones, that there would be a coverup.

It is entirely possible that the police chief, mayor, and governor lacked the intelligence and judgment to deal with the occasion. In other words, perhaps they are too stupid to be in public office. The incapacity of the American public to elect qualified representatives is world-renown. But it is also possible that Michael Brown’s killing provided another opportunity to accustom Americans to the need for military violence to be deployed against the civilian population in order to protect us from threats.

Occupy Wall Street was white, and these whites were overwhelmed by police violence. This is why I conclude that more is involved in Ferguson than white racist attitudes toward blacks.

The founding fathers warned against allowing US military forces to be deployed against the American people, and the Posse Comitatus Act prevents the use of military forces against civilians. These restrictions designed to protect liberty have been subverted by the George W. Bush and Obama regimes.

Today Americans have no more protection against state violence than Germans had under National Socialism.

Far from being a “light unto the world,” America is descending into cold hard tyranny.

Who will liberate us?

This from BloombergBusinessweek: www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-08- 21/ferguson-economic-political-conditions-fuel-protest-fury?campaign_id=DN082114

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Not worthy of reading, waste of time.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-08-22   7:42:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada, NeoconsNailed, *antifa* (#0)

Today Americans have no more protection against state violence than Germans had under National Socialism.

State violence most Germans experienced was from embargoes, Allied carpet bombings, Soviet marauders, and post-war retribution on both sides of the iron curtain.

All because Neville Chamberlain was persuaded to give Poland a guarantee.

Deasy  posted on  2014-08-22   8:59:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0)

It was a good article. Thank you for sharing it. Truth is , we are all about to entertain our worst civil war ideas... The police were beating up nuns at another protest the other day.... Things are only getting worse. but someday I have faith that they will get better.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2014-08-22   9:53:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ada (#0)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis...ited_States,_January_2014

Roberts opening sentence, There are reports that American police kill 500 or more Americans every year is wrong.

No need to read past that.

The phrase for the day is, "undocumented shoppers."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2014-08-22   10:21:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

Everyones seen the meme that cops have killed 5k since 9/11, "more than the terrorists." I assume there's accurate?

As far as 500 per year, is wikipedia a trustworthy source to rebutt that 500 number? It seems 1 a day at least killed by a cop seems like it'd be reasonably accurate, tho I could be wrong.

Did you see the chp in ca beating that black woman on the freeway?

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2014-08-22   10:40:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deasy (#2)

All because Neville Chamberlain was persuaded to give Poland a guarantee.

But in defense of Poland, that so-called "guarantee" from Britain didn't turn out so well for that nation either.

We'd like you to meet Uncle Joe, Poland.

Best regards from FDR and Churchill.

Don't call us, we'll call you, Poland.

scrapper2  posted on  2014-08-22   10:46:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Artisan (#5)

Rather than considering the questions, "how many people were shot in a year", or "how many rounds were fired in any one encounter", the important questions are were the shootings justified. Roberts doesn't discuss that in his article and that is why it's tripe.

The phrase for the day is, "undocumented shoppers."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2014-08-22   10:47:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ada (#0)

This is an extremely complicated mess. I would like to say I hope it turns out the perp was in fact bodily menacing/attacking the cop (as was Rodney King, truth be known) because it would be so nice and simple and normal - but all one can say is "I hope truth and justice prevail, whatever they may turn out to be." No matter how many blax are justifiably shot by the fuzz each year, and it could be way under what's needed in terms of extreme criminality, it will do nobody any good to oversimplify things. "Just what the truth is, can't say anymore...."

We're up against two horrible facts, both grossly exacerbated by the Chosen: a criminal black underclass waging active, violent race war against whites, and police that grow up in NWO brainwashing centers (and in front of the jew box) and are instructed the Constitution is not only defunct but evil. AmeriKa is surveying the worst dictatorships of all time and busily implementing their egregious features -- including police states.

Those who read the most brutally honest truth sites know that police commit unthinkable crimes every day. They're reported a couple times a week, and that can't be more than the tip of the iceberg.

Paul Craig Roberts is one of the topmost writers for credibility. Just noticed he wrote it, so I would tend (!) to believe it if I had time to really read it. No doubt, if there are "racist" white police, many of them got that way by being "mugged by reality" on the job.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2014-08-25   4:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

A calm, rational, disconcerting presentation by one of our best people on the police issue:

http://libertycrier.com/ferguson-a-libertarian-look-will-grigg-on-the-tom-woods-show/

AmRen today: "Lynch Mob: DOJ Ferguson Unit Has Tainted Past, Investor's Business Daily 20 Comments It has a record of railroading white police officers."

(How do you do paragraphs with no break in between, as at amren.com?)

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2014-08-25   17:30:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest