Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: THOUGHTS FROM A BEATLE FAN
Source: WWW
URL Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-color-were-the-beatles-eyes
Published: Sep 23, 2014
Author: HOUNDDAWG QUASIMODO SCHWARTZ
Post Date: 2014-09-23 07:35:49 by HOUNDDAWG
Keywords: None
Views: 254
Comments: 32

The Beatles had a special power like no other, as was evidenced by the excitement their energies and harmonies generated.

SHE LOVES YOU was the musical equivalent of a fiery chariot, even though we weren't exactly sure of its origin or that of the occupants.

This makes the Tavistock Experiment theory plausible in my view.

I remember very well the sudden interest in every detail of the boys, including the eye color of each member.

It was noteworthy that Paul and I shared the same brown eye color, verified by teen mags and color photos.

But many years later a strange thing happened. Paul's eye color changed to hazel which clearly show in later snaps. Needless to say no national media or industry outlets question this anomaly, or even acknowledge that there was ever any confusion about the issue. All interviews with "Faul" include the same ridicule of the "PAUL IS DEAD" mystery, and none of the compelling evidence about his teeth, chin, nose, ear or height comparisons are ever mentioned or explained.

I don't know what happened but I do know that at one time Paul McCartney was a different person from the first young man we all admired.

Meet the Beatles Paul

Birthday: June 18th, 1942

Full Name: James Paul McCartney

Parents Names: James and Mary McCartney

Siblings: Micheal (Born 18 months later)

Height: 5'11"

Hair Color: Brown

Eye Color: Brown

Kids Names: Heather, Mary, Stella and James

First Wife: Linda Eastman

Anniversary: March 12th 1969

John

Birthday: October 9th 1940

Full Name: John Winston Lennon

Parents Names: Julia and Alfred Lennon

Siblings: None

Kids Names: Sean and Julian

First Wife: Cynthia Powell

Second Wife: Yoko Ono

Anniversaries: Cynthia-August 23rd, 1962 Yoko-?

Height: 5'11"

Hair Color: Brown

Eye Color: Brown

George

Birthday: February 25th, 1943

Full Name: George Harold Harrison

Parents Names: Louise and Harold Harrison

Siblings: Peter, Louise and Harry

Height: 5'11"

Hair Color: Brown

Eye Color: Brown

Kids Names: None

First Wife: Pattie Boyd

Second Wife: Olivia Trinidad Arias

Anniversaries: Pattie-January 21, 1966 Olivia-September 7th, 1978

Ringo

Birthday: July 7th, 1940

Full Name: Richard B. Starkey

Parents Names: Elsie and Richard Starkey

Siblings: None

Hieght: 5'8"

Hair Color: Brown

Eye Color: Blue

Kids Names: Zak, Jason and Lee

First Wife: Maureen Cox

Second Wife: Barbara Bach

Anniversaries: Maureen-February 11th, 1965 Barbara- April 27th, 1981

What color were the Beatles eyes?

Answers

The Beatles Eye Colors: John Lennon: light brown; Paul McCartney: Hazel; George Harrison: Dark Brown; Ringo Starr: Blue.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

---

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#2. To: HOUNDDAWG (#0) (Edited)

Are you saying you think Paul did die in 1969 and was replaced?

She Loves You was indeed a masterpiece unlike other eg Can't Buy Me Love that have been touted as such for no apparent reason.... I've enjoyed playing early moptop albums in Youtube and hearing some of the songs one always knew of but never heard like A Taste of Honey, Anna, Chains et al.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2014-09-23   10:37:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

---

#3. To: NeoconsNailed, JethroTull, James Deffenbach, christine (#2)

Are you saying you think Paul did die in 1969 and was replaced?

Please examine these pix and decide for yourself.

Paul went from one of the cutest heartthrobs in the biz to AMERICAN DAD, a guy with a goalie's chin that could block the puck with his hands behind his back. Most would agree that it was a ghastly change, possibly one step of the metamorphosis into the guy who couldn't sing on key live with WINGS. (This was years before AUTOTUNE. The real Paul occasionally sang flat while belting out tunes at the top of his range but it had a certain je ne sais quoi that "Faul" with WINGS could never duplicate.)

Also, further down the page there are snaps of of Brian Epstein. Well, one of them anyway.

While the nose continues to grow over the years the ears do not radically change in size or shape.

Ergo, those two people can't both be Epstein.

If the Beatles were much more than a successful musical group and were a rad experiment not unlike the CIA's deadly LSD crimes, tampering with the lives of unsuspecting, non consenting victims, then one need only accept the possibility that experiments in mass people control were/are important to some people, agencies and/or overlords of the underworld.

The video testimony of a woman who claimed she and her fellow schoolmates were bussed to the airport to appear as a "spontaneous welcoming committee" for the Fab Four speaks volumes. Once the footage was seen in the US, American teens were entrained by the belief that it was wheels down on a real witches' brew phenomenon ready to address their itchy needs.

And, what better example of Mr. Clemens' wit, that "A lie can make it halfway around the world before the truth can get its boot on"?

And, the savage criticism from the pulpits, the flat top wearing Wally Georges, the Klan, etc., was the best kind of publicity, and no more harmed the Beatles climb than Brando was damaged by his role as a motorcycle hood or Dean by his portrayal of a Rebel Without A Clue.

The only thing that hangs me up is the assertion that the music was written by operatives in the Tavistock reptile tank. I mean, Don Kirshner sought out what he considered to be the best songs for The Monkees. But the tunes were more bubble gummy and seemingly geared to the training bra demographic, and The band was no competition for the Beatles' vocals.

Is it possible that conspirators with sophisticated backgrounds could turn out timeless hits without a hint of cynicism? And, what if by pure evil chance the collaboration of Lennon and McCartney was an alchemist's dream turning I-IV-V formula rock into new "reptile scales" and chord patterns that were melodic gold!

Suppose Thelonius Monk, Oscar Peterson, Andre Previn, Ray Conniff (and an unknown librettist with a gift for teenage restroom graffiti rhyme) were enlisted into the army of the dead with promises of the ultimate dirty old man's forbidden fruit, so young that it smelled like puppy's breath?

I may be completely wrong but I'd bet that they could compose a lot better songs than Last Train To Clarksville.

And, Paul reportedly died in 1966, by the way. The Beatles stopped touring and Paul's moon face was suddenly triangular, and he was thereafter taller than the others in publicity shots and album covers.

The early transition photos seemingly show that it was a progressive undertaking to make brown eyed Paul into the hazel eyed wise guy who ridiculed the "PAUL IS DEAD" story on every late night TV show, including SNL.

it's simply impossible to reach the ninety percentile with even the most compelling truth in the face of official denial.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2014-09-27   4:33:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

---

#6. To: HOUNDDAWG (#3)

The only thing that hangs me up is the assertion that the music was written by operatives in the Tavistock reptile tank.

Tavistock? Who knows? The British connection is always there in the background.

However, there are very few big name acts that performed the music we grew up with that not populated by characters that have some demonstrable connection to military intelligence.

Jim Morrison, Frank Zappa, "Papa" John Phillips , David Crosby, Stephen Stills, Jackson Browne, Gram Parsons, and even Jimi Hendrix had some significant relationship to military intelligence or the MIC. (That of course is a just a small slice of a much larger cast of actors from this period.)

Our culture, thought patterns and emotions were shaped by them. Click on the link below to read extensive extracts from Dave McGowan's book.

Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation - Part I May 8, 2008

"There’s something happening here What it is ain’t exactly clear"

Join me now, if you have the time, as we take a stroll down memory lane to a time nearly four-and-a-half decades ago – a time when America last had uniformed ground troops fighting a sustained and bloody battle to impose, uhmm, ‘democracy’ on a sovereign nation.

It is the first week of August, 1964, and U.S. warships under the command of U.S. Navy Admiral George Stephen Morrison have allegedly come under attack while patrolling Vietnam’s Tonkin Gulf. This event, subsequently dubbed the ‘Tonkin Gulf Incident,’ will result in the immediate passing by the U.S. Congress of the obviously pre-drafted Tonkin Gulf Resolution, which will, in turn, quickly lead to America’s deep immersion into the bloody Vietnam quagmire. Before it is over, well over fifty thousand American bodies – along with literally millions of Southeast Asian bodies – will litter the battlefields of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.

For the record, the Tonkin Gulf Incident appears to differ somewhat from other alleged provocations that have driven this country to war. This was not, as we have seen so many times before, a ‘false flag’ operation (which is to say, an operation that involves Uncle Sam attacking himself and then pointing an accusatory finger at someone else). It was also not, as we have also seen on more than one occasion, an attack that was quite deliberately provoked. No, what the Tonkin Gulf incident actually was, as it turns out, is an ‘attack’ that never took place at all. The entire incident, as has been all but officially acknowledged, was spun from whole cloth. (It is quite possible, however, that the intent was to provoke a defensive response, which could then be cast as an unprovoked attack on U.S ships. The ships in question were on an intelligence mission and were operating in a decidedly provocative manner. It is quite possible that when Vietnamese forces failed to respond as anticipated, Uncle Sam decided to just pretend as though they had.)

Nevertheless, by early February 1965, the U.S. will – without a declaration of war and with no valid reason to wage one – begin indiscriminately bombing North Vietnam. By March of that same year, the infamous “Operation Rolling Thunder” will have commenced. Over the course of the next three-and-a-half years, millions of tons of bombs, missiles, rockets, incendiary devices and chemical warfare agents will be dumped on the people of Vietnam in what can only be described as one of the worst crimes against humanity ever perpetrated on this planet.

Also in March of 1965, the first uniformed U.S. soldier will officially set foot on Vietnamese soil (although Special Forces units masquerading as ‘advisers’ and ‘trainers’ had been there for at least four years, and likely much longer). By April 1965, fully 25,000 uniformed American kids, most still teenagers barely out of high school, will be slogging through the rice paddies of Vietnam. By the end of the year, U.S. troop strength will have surged to 200,000.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world in those early months of 1965, a new ‘scene’ is just beginning to take shape in the city of Los Angeles. In a geographically and socially isolated community known as Laurel Canyon – a heavily wooded, rustic, serene, yet vaguely ominous slice of LA nestled in the hills that separate the Los Angeles basin from the San Fernando Valley – musicians, singers and songwriters suddenly begin to gather as though summoned there by some unseen Pied Piper. Within months, the ‘hippie/flower child’ movement will be given birth there, along with the new style of music that will provide the soundtrack for the tumultuous second half of the 1960s.

An uncanny number of rock music superstars will emerge from Laurel Canyon beginning in the mid-1960s and carrying through the decade of the 1970s. The first to drop an album will be The Byrds, whose biggest star will prove to be David Crosby. The band’s debut effort, “Mr. Tambourine Man,” will be released on the Summer Solstice of 1965. It will quickly be followed by releases from the John Phillips-led Mamas and the Papas (“If You Can Believe Your Eyes and Ears,” January 1966), Love with Arthur Lee (“Love,” May 1966), Frank Zappa and The Mothers of Invention (“Freak Out,” June 1966), Buffalo Springfield, featuring Stephen Stills and Neil Young (“Buffalo Springfield,” October 1966), and The Doors (“The Doors,” January 1967).

One of the earliest on the Laurel Canyon/Sunset Strip scene is Jim Morrison, the enigmatic lead singer of The Doors. Jim will quickly become one of the most iconic, controversial, critically acclaimed, and influential figures to take up residence in Laurel Canyon. Curiously enough though, the self- proclaimed “Lizard King” has another claim to fame as well, albeit one that none of his numerous chroniclers will feel is of much relevance to his career and possible untimely death: he is the son, as it turns out, of the aforementioned Admiral George Stephen Morrison.

And so it is that, even while the father is actively conspiring to fabricate an incident that will be used to massively accelerate an illegal war, the son is positioning himself to become an icon of the ‘hippie’/anti-war crowd. Nothing unusual about that, I suppose. It is, you know, a small world and all that. And it is not as if Jim Morrison’s story is in any way unique.

randge  posted on  2014-09-27   13:26:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

---

#7. To: randge (#6)

Thanks much for this one.

Lod  posted on  2014-09-27   14:21:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

---

Replies to Comment # 7.

---

#8. To: Lod (#7)

You're welcome.

A little off topic, but with regard to the historical events that McGowan refers to, I remember back in high school days when the Tonkin Gulf incident was still hot. I recall how controversial it was in many circles at the time. So controversial in fact that the Navy sent representatives to schools around the country to attempt reinforce a consensus that it was vital for Americans to do something about communist aggression in SE Asia.

They sent us a lieutenant in naval uniform to talk to an assembly of students to specifically address the doubts held at that time, speaking to an audience who, I don't need to remind you, was still subject to an active draft.

Lots of my classmates were the sons and daughters of a well-informed officer / academic class who were hooked up with the info pipeline of the day. Our Pentagram representative did his spiel on the Tonkin Gulf "attack" and was met with an unexpected volley of criticism and resistance from kids who had been made aware of the fabrications that were drawing so many of their fellows into the Vietnam quagmire. That young lieutenant was visibly shaken by the heat of the comments that he was receiving, and our school administrators tried unsuccessfully to get the students to moderate their attacks. It surely was not the kind of meeting that the school or the military had planned.

Here we are 45 years later, and what has changed? Many are aware of the games played in Washington that are sucking into ruinous conflict. Many more haven't got a clue, and the juggernaut rolls on.

randge  posted on  2014-09-27 15:57:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

---

End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest