Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Don’t watch RT!
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://rt.com/op-edge/201307-rt-uk-launch-media-criticism/
Published: Nov 2, 2014
Author: Neil Clark
Post Date: 2014-11-02 06:11:38 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 304
Comments: 13

RT

As RT UK launches, attacks on the channel in the British media have stepped up…

The latest is a piece by Mr. Cyril Waugh-Monger, a very important newspaper columnist for the NeoCon Daily, a patron of the Senator Joe McCarthy Appreciation Society and author of 'Why the Iraq War was a Brilliant Idea' and 'The Humanitarian Case for Bombing Syria.'

Dear socially inferior person reading this article. My name is Cyril Waugh-Monger (I'm called 'Mr Terribly Pompous Neo-Con' by my friends) and I’m here to tell you why on no account should you watch RT and why you should be making complaints to Ofcom about this dreadful channel so that in the interests of 'free speech' and 'democracy' we can get it off air. 1. RT doesn’t peddle Russophobia

Outrageously, RT doesn’t compare Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler. It doesn‘t join in with the demonization of Russia and its leader. How can we have a channel which is watched by people in Britain, which doesn’t do that? We neocons say that demonization of Russia and its leader is compulsory. How dare RT not do as we say! 2. RT is sometimes rude to bankers

There’s a man on RT called Max Keiser and he is often very rude to bankers. Why, he has even called for them to face the death penalty. Such disrespect to our financial elites is shocking and should not be allowed in a free society.

Still from RT video 3. Its coverage of the MH17 crash

Shockingly, RT commentators didn’t rush to blame Vladimir Putin for the air disaster within seconds of the news breaking. Some even said that we should wait for the forensic evidence before any statements apportioning guilt were made. Others said that we couldn’t rule out that the plane was downed by an another aircraft. This failure to come and say loud and clear “Putin personally shot down the plane with a missile he made and fired with his own hands” within minutes of the crash is clear evidence of RT’s bias and why it must be taken off the air. 4. RT’s ‘pundits’ include people who aren’t neocons and ‘liberal interventionists’

This is truly scandalous: RT gives airtime to people who don’t support the West’s policy of endless war and who opposed airstrikes on Syria last year. Why, it’s even broadcast interviews with the convener of the Stop the War coalition – and has a regular weekly show fronted by George Galloway! This is unconscionable. Only people who support Western foreign policy should be allowed to express their views on international affairs on television, not 'cranks' and 'fanatics' who oppose attacking a sovereign state in the Middle East on deceitful grounds every couple of years. Why, if RT had been around in 2003, it would no doubt have given airtime to anti-war ‘conspiracy theorists’ who would have told viewers that Iraq had no WMDs – and claimed, fantastically – that Bush and Blair were making it all up.

Still from RT video 5. RT provides airtime to genuine socialists and genuine conservatives

This is really terrible: RT interviews people who oppose neo-liberalism and globalization, from both the left and the right. It’s given the microphone to socialists, communists, greens, and 'extremists' on the right, like Ron Paul. These people should not be allowed to express their views on television; they are 'cranks' and should be totally marginalized. Only those who support the hegemonic consensus should be allowed on TV. It's very important that in order to protect free speech and democracy, alternative opinions are not heard.

Former Republican presidential candidate, Representative Ron Paul. (Reuters/Jason Reed) 6. RT pundits have ‘extremist’ links

I monitor the people who appear on RT very, very closely and I can tell you that there was once a case of an RT interviewee who had a link on his website to another website which had a link to another website which had a link to another website – which denied the Holocaust and said that little green men from Mars were ruling the US.

After considerable research I also found that another RT pundit once attended a conference where a fellow invitee had once sat at a restaurant table, a few days after another person who had actually praised Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, and Josef Stalin in a magazine article published in North Korea in 1962. 7. RT is anti-semitic

Ok, I’ve got no evidence of this, but I’ll bung it in anyway as it sounds good. 8. RT has broadcast documentaries on the wars in Yugoslavia which don’t blame the Serbs for everything

This is totally unacceptable.

An elderly woman carries her belongings November 22 in Sarajevo's war shattered airport settlement. (Reuters) 9. RT has had ‘experts’ on its programs who have made some very strong criticisms of Israel

This too is totally unacceptable. 10. RT pundits have often ridiculed leading American policy makers

For instance, when the US Secretary of State John Kerry said that “you just don't in the 21st century” invade another country on “completely trumped up pretext,” some people on RT had the audacity to say “What about Iraq?” This lack of respect towards a leading American politician is appalling, and in a free society ought not be allowed. The correct procedure whenever a leading US political figure speaks is to tug one’s forelock. 11. RT’s coverage of the conflict in Syria

In 2011-13, we had so-called ‘experts’ on Syria telling us on RT that some of the freedom-fighting pro-democracy rebels were actually fanatical terrorists who were guilty of committing atrocities. This was obviously a clear lie. Islamist terrorists like ISIS have only been active in Syria since 2014 and of course it’s all the fault of President Assad and Russia.

Civilians walk past damaged buildings in the Damascus suburb of Jobar October 28, 2014. (Reuters/Badra Mamet) 12. RT interviews lots of people whose views I do not share

It ought not to be allowed! Aren’t we supposed to live in a democracy? 13. The most important reason: RT is a threat

More and more people are watching it – which is why me and my little group of neocons and ‘liberal interventionists’ are so worried and stepping up our attacks on the station and denigrating those people who appear on it.

The next big war is going to be much harder for us to ‘sell’ to the plebs, because we are no longer in control of the narrative as we were in 2003, before the Iraq war. Oh, what happy days those were!

Don’t watch RT because we really don’t want you to 'question more.' We want you to question less. It's much easier for us that way.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Neil Clark is a journalist, writer and broadcaster. His award winning blog can be found at www.neilclark66.blogspot.com. Follow him on Twitter

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

And Friday night, RT had a documentary regarding the USS Liberty being bombed by Israel. It was somewhat whitewashed but better than CNN by far.....

It's on cable in the USA. So is Aljazeera.

ratcat  posted on  2014-11-02   9:11:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

RT bump

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-11-02   9:19:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: ratcat (#1)

USS Liberty being bombed by Israel

I know a lot about this incident with the USS Liberty.

She was a lightly armed intelligence vessel off the coast of the Sinai during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. She picked up intelligence that the Israelis massacred 3,000 Egyptian prisoners in the Sinai. The Israelis tried to sink her, but they couldn't do it.

This is on Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U SS_Liberty_incident

The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats, on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War.[3] The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two Marines, and one civilian), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship.[4] At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nmi (29.3 mi; 47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish.[1][5]

Israel apologized for the attack, saying that the USS Liberty had been attacked in error after being mistaken for an Egyptian ship.[6] Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[7]

In May 1968, the Israeli government paid US$3,323,500 (US$22.5 million in 2014) as full payment to the families of the 34 men killed in the attack. In March 1969, Israel paid a further $3,566,457 in compensation to the men who had been wounded. On 18 December 1980, it agreed to pay $6 million as settlement for the final U.S. bill of $17,132,709 for material damage to the Liberty herself plus 13 years' interest.[8]

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-11-02   9:19:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: BTP Holdings (#3)

Israel apologized for the attack, saying that the USS Liberty had been attacked in error after being mistaken for an Egyptian ship.[6] Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[7]

In the documentary, they played the recording of the Israeli pilots calling in to their control tower asking the identity of the ship (which had a huge US flag flying over it) and the control tower said it was American. But yet they had orders to fire upon it.

The documentary concluded that the Israelis did not want the US intelligence ship to listen in on what they were going to do next - take more Palestinian land.

ratcat  posted on  2014-11-02   10:11:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

I've actually arrived at a state of eager anticipation for the shit to actually hit the fan !

"I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.". Étienne de La Boétie

noone222  posted on  2014-11-02   10:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: noone222 (#5) (Edited)

I've actually arrived at a state of eager anticipation for the shit to actually hit the fan !

It's been hitting the fan for quite some time now. Before the U.S. invaded Iraq, the Iraqis were slant drilling under the Kuwaiti border to steal Kuwaiti oil.

After the Iraqis invaded Kuwait (claiming that it was the 19th province of Iraq

September-3-">middleeast.about.com/od/t...ig/August-28-September-3- in- Midea/Iraq-Renames-Kuwait-Kadhima.htm), the U.S. began to plan its invasion of Iraq. It was a long ordeal for the Americans who were sent there.

Scott Ritter, the U.N. Weapons Inspector, said there were NO WMDs in Iraq. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-11-02   11:11:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: noone222 (#5)

I've actually arrived at a state of eager anticipation for the shit to actually hit the fan !

Me as well noone!

The direction that things in this country are headed is catastrophic and morally unsustainable. Life in this country is becoming increasingly not worth living. There's no escape either as our empire like the global vampire squid led by the Synagogue of Satan has begun to suffocate us all.

Time for a "little" shake-up to put some fear into people instead of their idiotic dumbfounded acquiescence to an absurdly ridiculous and transparent (to the cognizant which they are not a part of) paradigm.

Nothing's going to change so let's have at it.

Katniss  posted on  2014-11-02   17:59:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Katniss (#7)

Time for a "little" shake-up to put some fear into people instead of their idiotic dumbfounded acquiescence to an absurdly ridiculous and transparent (to the cognizant which they are not a part of) paradigm.

wow. i have to borrow that. it's awesome. ;)

To question is to value the ideal of truth more highly than the loyalties to nation, religion, race, or ideology.

christine  posted on  2014-11-02   20:50:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

The latest is a piece by Mr. Cyril Waugh-Monger

LOL! You can't make this shit up!

Cyril Woe Monger attacks!! Run! Run for your lives!!

" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11

"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne

abraxas  posted on  2014-11-02   21:16:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: christine, Katniss, 4 (#8)

Yep, it's a mouthful, but it's spot-on correct.

Bring it.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-11-02   21:19:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: BTP Holdings (#6)

Before the U.S. invaded Iraq, the Iraqis were slant drilling under the Kuwaiti border to steal Kuwaiti oil

I heard it was the other way around... In fact I read that it was the reason for the invasion.... Because the Kuwaitis would not stop slant drilling Iraqi oil.

Just saying, thats what I read and heard.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2014-11-03   3:37:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: BTP Holdings (#3) (Edited)

This is on Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U SS_Liberty_incident

Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[7]

In May 1968, the Israeli government paid US$3,323,500 (US$22.5 million in 2014) as full payment to the families of the 34 men killed in the attack. In March 1969, Israel paid a further $3,566,457 in compensation to the men who had been wounded. On 18 December 1980, it agreed to pay $6 million as settlement for the final U.S. bill of $17,132,709 for material damage to the Liberty herself plus 13 years' interest.[8]

Cross-referencing Post #1 [a screen format here of the Aljazeera America video at Dailymotion: THE DAY ISRAEL ATTACKED AMERICA] and also Post #3 of a 4um topic titled: "The Day Israel Attacked America"

Dailymotion video: THE DAY ISRAEL ATTACKED AMERICA

At 47:22 to end: ... American .gov lawyer deemed children under the age of 5, who had lost their fathers from the attack, couldn't sufficiently comprehend their lifelong loss of a parent enough to suffer shock and grief and the US proposed they receive nothing. Israel accepted.

The incalcuable number of American troops lost in Vietnam because the USS Liberty was not available for service there [is] still not even being acknowledged at all.

The Naval Court of Inquiry overstepped its bounds because it was not tasked with determining the extent of Israel's guilt or not due to its claim of mistaken identity. That issue should have been transferred to the jusrisdiction of a Congressional investigation; Congress being the branch Constitutionally that acts on behalf of the American People to provision our Navy and other Military forces.

In a debate years ago on this subject, I was basically told by someone arguing for the Israeli version that the question of whether or not they could adequately see the American flag waving (as they should have easily been able to because the ship was moving at the time, not standing still) was wholly irrelevant -- i.e. a "red herring" because they would have attacked the ship anyway under the assumption that it was flying false colors. In other words, it didn't really matter to them if they were striking an Egyptian ship or an American ship or even if civilians were aboard. One of their other claims was that they were striking the ship because it was moving at warship speed of 20+ knots. However, records for the USS Liberty show that one of its two boilers was off since noon that day (two hours before the attacks) for repairs and remained so for some time after the attacks began. So, it could not have been traveling at anywhere near the speed of a combat vessel because both boilers would have been needed for it to even reach its top speed range of 17 knots. (Reference: Post #3 of a 4um topic titled: "The Day Israel Attacked America")

Edited for punctuation.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-11-09   17:33:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: titorite (#11)

I heard it was the other way around... In fact I read that it was the reason for the invasion.... Because the Kuwaitis would not stop slant drilling Iraqi oil.

You may be right about that. The meningitis has messed with my memory an awful lot. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-11-10   18:00:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest