Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Pat Buchanan: 'Rogue President' Says 'To Hell With Constitution'
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/B ... 11202014&s=al&dkt_nbr=k4mj8wxq
Published: Nov 20, 2014
Author: Sandy Fitzgerald
Post Date: 2014-11-20 18:06:21 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 334
Comments: 33

Pat Buchanan: 'Rogue President' Says 'To Hell With Constitution'

Thursday, 20 Nov 2014 10:52 AM

By Sandy Fitzgerald

The United States has a "rogue president" who has decided he is going to do what he wants to do and "to hell with the Constitution," columnist Pat Buchanan, former adviser to Presidents Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, told Newsmax TV Thursday.

"We have a rogue president who tonight is going to announce that he is going to do something he said not so long ago, one year ago, he does not have the legal or constitutional authority to do," Buchanan told "America's Forum" host J.D. Hayworth.

Story continues below video.

"This is being done for his political base in the Hispanic community. He looked at the election returns and said, with Republicans strengthened like this, there's nothing I can get done with Congress so I'm going to do what I can do and what I want to do and to hell with the Constitution."

Buchanan also said he does not dispute the numbers from the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC poll, which shows that most Americans don't agree with Obama taking executive action on immigration.

"The country realizes that the president here is acting in a usurpacious manner, that he is seizing power that he does not have," the conservative columnist told Hayworth. "Why is he doing it now? Why didn't he do it two years ago? If he had this authority why didn't he do it four years ago?"

Obama has always realized that he did not have the authority under the Constitution to enact an executive order granting amnesty to undocumented immigrants, said Buchanan.

And while there have been some who have warned about the potential for violence, once Obama announces his executive action, which was delayed earlier this year until after the midterm elections, Buchanan said he wouldn't predict violence, but he also would not be surprised by it.

"If you get wild celebrations in the community of illegal aliens around the country cheering and laughing at the rest of the country, you completely demoralize the Border Patrol and the sheriffs along that border who have been fighting this good fight for a long, long time and who have tried to do their job," Buchanan told Hayworth. "They're now being told everything you've done to protect the border and to maintain us as one nation, one people, is by the boards.

"We're in another country now and I can't express how much I feel this diminishes us as one nation, one people, and one country when you've said, in effect, folks who can walk into your house and sit down at the table are entitled to do so and entitled to remain," said Buchanan. "We cannot deport them and deportation is out of the question."

Further, Buchanan called the president's decision on executive action an "ollie-ollie-oxen-free invitation" for people who are not arriving legally, and an insult to the people who have been patient and taken the legal steps to become American citizens.

"Folks who have waited to become American citizens because they love the country and this is where they want to raise their children, they all look like fools now," said Buchanan. "They all look like people who obeyed America's laws and followed policies and our customs and traditions, and the guys who went up and walked across the border or pushed their kids across the border, they triumphed. They succeeded. They've won."

Story continues below video.

Buchanan called the executive action plan a "constitutional crisis," and said Congress will have to "contain and control Obama" until his presidency is over in two years.

"We have a president of the United States who says, I'm not going to enforce the laws that require me to basically deport and remove [illegals] from society and send [them] back where they came from, people who have broken into our country and broken our laws," said Buchanan. "Yeah, you'd have something of a constitutional crisis."

However, he doesn't believe impeachment is the answer. Buchanan said there are not enough votes for that extreme action and "you don't want to put [Vice President] Joe Biden in there."

But he does believe that what Obama is doing is "an impeachable act."

"That doesn't mean that the Congress should immediately move to impeach him, but it's very difficult to see how there's any comity, any union, or any agreement in the next two years," Buchanan told Hayworth.

And even though Obama knows he doesn't really have the authority to enact his amnesty plan, and he won't be able to get the legislation through the incoming Republican-controlled Congress, "he's going ahead and like a dictator he's doing it himself," said Buchanan. "And he says, impeach me and be damned."

Buchanan said that if he were advising Obama like he advised former Presidents Reagan and Nixon, he'd remind him that his legacy will be as a president who broke the law and violated the Constitution.

Buchanan said he'd tell Obama: "You believe it's going to be a good legacy, but I can tell you this, you yourself said you will be breaking the law and violating the Constitution. So that's going to stick, that's going to be a stigma around you, and I'll tell you this, Mr. President, when some problems arise from these folks whom you're giving an executive amnesty to in this country, people are going to turn and say that happened because the president of the United States gave them a blanket pardon."

Buchanan said he'd also tell Obama that while he may feel the executive action "is going to be treated as some kind of Emancipation Proclamation," it isn't.

"By what authority does he decide 4 or 5 million get amnesty and 4 or 5 million don't?" said Buchanan. "Is there something in the law that says that's the right figure? There's nothing in the law. He has no law to back up what he's doing."

Read Latest Breaking News from http://Newsmax.com www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-T.../id/608598/#ixzz3JeXCKKVL


Poster Comment:

Pat hits another home run. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Yawn...

Pubs will huff and puff, roll over and play dead.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-11-20   18:26:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams292.htm

JB Williams writes:

First, I state for the record – REPUBLICANS HAVE ALL THE POWER THEY NEED TO STOP EXECUTIVE ORDER AMNESTY DEAD, RIGHT NOW!

This means that for Obama to get away with what he is about to attempt, Congressional Republicans will have to allow him to get away with it. It means that Congressional Republicans want amnesty too, but want to be able to use Obama’s unilateral move as a political hammer later…

Second, although many Congressional Democrats are too ignorant to know or care that what Obama is about to attempt is both unconstitutional and illegal, Obama himself does know, which is why he has not already done it, before being bullied into doing it now.

So, if Republicans care to represent their constituents by upholding the Rule of Constitutional Law and protecting and defending the sovereignty and security of the United States, they will have to STOP OBAMA AMNESTY dead in its tracks. Or, they become complicit in Obama’s treason…

christine  posted on  2014-11-20   18:50:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: christine (#2)

Exactly correct, and Amen.

Lod  posted on  2014-11-20 19:07:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#2)

Good commentary, spot on.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2014-11-20 19:51:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: christine (#2) (Edited)

www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams292.htm

A good article for the most part but conflates Immigration and Naturalization as if inseparably synonymous and, as many have been accustomed to do, it also blurs any distinction between "customary law" (i.e. Common Law or UN-styled "norms") and Constitutional Law. It would be correct for the author to say that the Executive Branch has no legal authority to establish rules of Immigration and neither does Congress because that is a power retained by the States, not delegated in the Constitution to Federal authority. It would be correct for the author to say that the Executive Branch has no legal authority to deregulate uniform rules of Naturalization because the Citizenship step of the legal Immigration process is a sole power of the US Congress. It would be correct for the author to say that the Executive Branch has no legal authority to refuse enforcement of all Constitutionally valid laws pertaining to both Immigration and Naturalization. What is being asserted by some politicos as permissible, though, is that Presidents can issue mass Executive Reprieves and Pardons/Amnesty for Immigration violators even if there is no valid objection to the applicable law(s) as Constitutionally incorrect and even if the offenders haven't been formally charged as such. Sort of like Nixon being pardoned even though he was never criminally charged.

Regardless, Reprieves/Pardons aren't the equivalent in this case of Immunity from being promptly/immediately thereafter reset by the States and Congress to Immigration lawbreaker status. At that point, re-ordering enforcement stand-downs by members of the Executive and Judicial branches on deportations and unlawful employment issues and so on would amount to impeachably assuming powers to violate law that none of them have. That could mean not just impeachment to remove a rogue Executive from the Oval Office but any participating Cabinet members too and all others who can be impeached for obeying those orders, followed with criminal proceedings against each of them.

Edited for spelling and formatting.

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-11-21 05:04:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine, Lod, noone222, X-15, Jethro Tull (#2)

Or, they become complicit in Obama’s treason…

For one hundred years we have seen what happens to politicians that try to awaken Americans.

All were shot at, poisoned and or destroyed. The list is short but well known.

Lindbergh, McFadden, McCarthy, Nixon.

Obama will skate thru his two remaining years, even tho the voters did send a message, the system will ignore.

Remember there are now over 100 million Americans not voting for whatever reason and that number grows by every election.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-11-21 14:59:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest